Bone Safety Profile of Steroidal Aromatase Inhibitor in Comparison to Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitors in Postmenopausal Women with Breast Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-18 DOI:10.1159/000523695
Shanshan Chen, Lan Bo, Dan Lv, Fei Ma
{"title":"Bone Safety Profile of Steroidal Aromatase Inhibitor in Comparison to Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitors in Postmenopausal Women with Breast Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Shanshan Chen,&nbsp;Lan Bo,&nbsp;Dan Lv,&nbsp;Fei Ma","doi":"10.1159/000523695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) provide an alternative to tamoxifen as an adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal patients with breast cancer (BC). Large trials resulted better outcomes with AIs. Adjuvant therapy with AIs reduced the risk of relapse compared with tamoxifen. Systemic therapies for BC can interfere with bone turnover, either by affecting gonadal steroid hormone production or by inhibiting peripheral aromatization into estrogen. We aimed to evaluate the safety profile of bone-related events by comparing 3 AIs with tamoxifen and a placebo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines were used for network meta-analyses (NMAs). Searches were performed using PubMed, Embase/Medline, Cochrane, and Ovid databases. Randomized controlled trials comparing tamoxifen and placebo or other AIs to steroidal or nonsteroidal AIs in patients with BC reporting bone-related safety events were included in NMA. NMA in a Bayesian approach was performed using R software (ver 3.2), Gemtc package.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies reporting 4 different bone-related endpoints were included. Although there was no statistical significance, treatment with exemestane lowered the incidence of bone pain (odds ratio [OR] vs. anastrozole and letrozole: 0.63, 0.54), fracture episodes (OR vs. anastrozole and letrozole: 0.84, 0.80), and osteoporosis (OR vs. anastrozole and letrozole: 0.85, 0.73) compared with letrozole and anastrozole. Reduction in bone mineral density was lesser in exemestane than in anastrozole (mean reduction in hip: 1.05; lumbar spine: 1.25). Treatment ranking with the surface under the cumulative ranking curve showed that exemestane was found to reduce the incidence of bone-related adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A lower incidence of bone-related safety events was observed in patients treated with exemestane.</p>","PeriodicalId":520575,"journal":{"name":"Breast care (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":"391-402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ea/7a/brc-0017-0391.PMC9453661.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast care (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000523695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and objectives: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) provide an alternative to tamoxifen as an adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal patients with breast cancer (BC). Large trials resulted better outcomes with AIs. Adjuvant therapy with AIs reduced the risk of relapse compared with tamoxifen. Systemic therapies for BC can interfere with bone turnover, either by affecting gonadal steroid hormone production or by inhibiting peripheral aromatization into estrogen. We aimed to evaluate the safety profile of bone-related events by comparing 3 AIs with tamoxifen and a placebo.

Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines were used for network meta-analyses (NMAs). Searches were performed using PubMed, Embase/Medline, Cochrane, and Ovid databases. Randomized controlled trials comparing tamoxifen and placebo or other AIs to steroidal or nonsteroidal AIs in patients with BC reporting bone-related safety events were included in NMA. NMA in a Bayesian approach was performed using R software (ver 3.2), Gemtc package.

Results: Seventeen studies reporting 4 different bone-related endpoints were included. Although there was no statistical significance, treatment with exemestane lowered the incidence of bone pain (odds ratio [OR] vs. anastrozole and letrozole: 0.63, 0.54), fracture episodes (OR vs. anastrozole and letrozole: 0.84, 0.80), and osteoporosis (OR vs. anastrozole and letrozole: 0.85, 0.73) compared with letrozole and anastrozole. Reduction in bone mineral density was lesser in exemestane than in anastrozole (mean reduction in hip: 1.05; lumbar spine: 1.25). Treatment ranking with the surface under the cumulative ranking curve showed that exemestane was found to reduce the incidence of bone-related adverse events.

Conclusion: A lower incidence of bone-related safety events was observed in patients treated with exemestane.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

与非甾体芳香化酶抑制剂相比,甾体芳香化酶抑制剂对绝经后乳腺癌患者的骨安全性:网络荟萃分析
背景和目的:芳香酶抑制剂(AIs)为绝经后乳腺癌(BC)患者提供了一种替代他莫昔芬的辅助治疗方法。大型试验结果表明,人工智能治疗效果更好。与他莫昔芬相比,AIs辅助治疗降低了复发风险。BC的全身治疗可以通过影响性腺类固醇激素的产生或抑制外周芳构化成雌激素来干扰骨转换。我们的目的是通过比较3种ai与他莫昔芬和安慰剂来评估骨相关事件的安全性。方法:采用系统评价首选报告项目和元分析指南进行网络元分析(nma)。检索使用PubMed、Embase/Medline、Cochrane和Ovid数据库。在报告骨相关安全事件的BC患者中,比较他莫昔芬、安慰剂或其他ai与甾体或非甾体ai的随机对照试验被纳入NMA。贝叶斯方法的NMA使用R软件(版本3.2),Gemtc软件包进行。结果:17项研究报告了4个不同的骨相关终点。虽然没有统计学意义,但依西美坦治疗与来曲唑和来曲唑相比,降低了骨痛的发生率(比值比[OR]与阿那曲唑和来曲唑比较:0.63,0.54)、骨折发生率(比值比[OR]与阿那曲唑和来曲唑比较:0.84,0.80)和骨质疏松症发生率(比值比:与阿那曲唑和来曲唑比较:0.85,0.73)。依西美坦组骨密度的降低低于阿那曲唑组(髋部平均降低:1.05;腰椎:1.25)。累积排序曲线下的表面排列显示依西美坦可以降低骨相关不良事件的发生率。结论:依西美坦治疗的患者骨相关安全事件发生率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信