The need to accurately measure energy intake and expenditure in patients with systemic sclerosis.

IF 1.4 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Michael Hughes, Elizabeth Harrison, Ariane L Herrick, John T McLaughlin, Simon Lal
{"title":"The need to accurately measure energy intake and expenditure in patients with systemic sclerosis.","authors":"Michael Hughes,&nbsp;Elizabeth Harrison,&nbsp;Ariane L Herrick,&nbsp;John T McLaughlin,&nbsp;Simon Lal","doi":"10.1177/23971983221095763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malnutrition is common in systemic sclerosis and patients are frequently underweight. However, the balance between assessed dietary energy intake versus expenditure has been neglected to date. This study aimed to assess energy (dietary) intakes and expenditures and to compare discrepancies in systemic sclerosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-six outpatients with systemic sclerosis completed the study. Demographics and clinical data were recorded. Functional questionnaires were completed. Predicted energy requirements were calculated. Over a consecutive 3-day period, patients completed an estimated food diary and wore a specialist energy expenditure monitor (SenseWear<sup>®</sup> Armband). Assessments of intake and expenditure were compared for individual patients, and the impact according to patient demographics, clinical manifestations and disease severity evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Energy intake did not correlate with predicted (s = 0.117; p = 0.511) or measured (s = -0.039; p = 0.825) expenditures. Predicted and measured energy expenditures correlated, but actual values differed for individuals (intraclass correlation = 0.62; 95% limits of agreement = -459 to 751 kcal). Respiratory involvement was negatively correlated with number of steps (s = -0.350; p = 0.04) and time spent lying (s = 0.333; p = 0.05). There was a significant correlation between body mass index and predicted versus measured energy discrepancy (s = 0.41; p = 0.02), and this discrepancy was greater with higher body mass indices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no correlation between intake and either predicted or measured energy expenditure. Predicted and measured energy expenditures were strongly correlated yet differed for the individual patient. In patients with systemic sclerosis, where energy expenditure must be accurately assessed, it should be directly measured.</p>","PeriodicalId":17036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9537710/pdf/10.1177_23971983221095763.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23971983221095763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Malnutrition is common in systemic sclerosis and patients are frequently underweight. However, the balance between assessed dietary energy intake versus expenditure has been neglected to date. This study aimed to assess energy (dietary) intakes and expenditures and to compare discrepancies in systemic sclerosis.

Methods: Thirty-six outpatients with systemic sclerosis completed the study. Demographics and clinical data were recorded. Functional questionnaires were completed. Predicted energy requirements were calculated. Over a consecutive 3-day period, patients completed an estimated food diary and wore a specialist energy expenditure monitor (SenseWear® Armband). Assessments of intake and expenditure were compared for individual patients, and the impact according to patient demographics, clinical manifestations and disease severity evaluated.

Results: Energy intake did not correlate with predicted (s = 0.117; p = 0.511) or measured (s = -0.039; p = 0.825) expenditures. Predicted and measured energy expenditures correlated, but actual values differed for individuals (intraclass correlation = 0.62; 95% limits of agreement = -459 to 751 kcal). Respiratory involvement was negatively correlated with number of steps (s = -0.350; p = 0.04) and time spent lying (s = 0.333; p = 0.05). There was a significant correlation between body mass index and predicted versus measured energy discrepancy (s = 0.41; p = 0.02), and this discrepancy was greater with higher body mass indices.

Conclusion: There was no correlation between intake and either predicted or measured energy expenditure. Predicted and measured energy expenditures were strongly correlated yet differed for the individual patient. In patients with systemic sclerosis, where energy expenditure must be accurately assessed, it should be directly measured.

需要准确测量系统性硬化症患者的能量摄入和消耗。
背景:营养不良在系统性硬化症中很常见,患者经常体重不足。然而,迄今为止,评估的膳食能量摄入与支出之间的平衡一直被忽视。本研究旨在评估能量(饮食)摄入和支出,并比较系统性硬化症的差异。方法:36例系统性硬化症门诊患者完成本研究。记录人口统计学和临床数据。完成了功能性问卷调查。计算了预测的能源需求。在连续3天的时间里,患者完成了一份估计的食物日记,并佩戴了专业的能量消耗监测仪(SenseWear®臂章)。比较了个别患者的摄入和支出评估,并根据患者人口统计、临床表现和疾病严重程度评估了影响。结果:能量摄入与预测(s = 0.117;p = 0.511)或测量值 = -0.039;p = 0.825)支出。预测和测量的能源支出相关,但个体的实际值不同(组内相关性 = 0.62;95%的协议限制 = -459至751 kcal)。呼吸系统受累与步数呈负相关 = -0.350;p = 0.04)和躺着的时间 = 0.333;p = 0.05)。体重指数与预测与测量的能量差异之间存在显著相关性(s = 0.41;p = 0.02),并且随着体重指数的升高,这种差异更大。结论:摄入与预测或测量的能量消耗之间没有相关性。预测和测量的能量消耗具有很强的相关性,但个体患者的能量消耗不同。在系统性硬化症患者中,能量消耗必须准确评估,应该直接测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信