Communicating Effectively With People Experiencing Homelessness to Prevent Infectious Diseases.

Elizabeth M Allen, Betsy Smither, Lindsey Barranco, Jennifer Reynolds, Kelli Bursey, Kristin Mattson, Emily Mosites
{"title":"Communicating Effectively With People Experiencing Homelessness to Prevent Infectious Diseases.","authors":"Elizabeth M Allen,&nbsp;Betsy Smither,&nbsp;Lindsey Barranco,&nbsp;Jennifer Reynolds,&nbsp;Kelli Bursey,&nbsp;Kristin Mattson,&nbsp;Emily Mosites","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiac336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People experiencing homelessness (PEH) are disproportionately affected by many infectious diseases, including coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, communication efforts during public health emergencies like the COVID-19 pandemic often do not consider the unique needs of PEH. We examined how PEH seek and receive health information and how traditional health communication methods resonate with them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted in-person focus groups with PEH in 4 jurisdictions (Cincinnati, Ohio; Denver, Colorado; Sacramento, California; and the Bronx, New York) during July 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings from 15 focus groups with PEH (n = 53) revealed the need for trusted messengers and consistent messaging across local organizations, as PEH seek to verify information they receive from multiple sources. PEH overwhelmingly preferred to receive health information through face-to-face conversations, especially with healthcare providers with whom they had an established relationship, but they also cited news media, the internet, and social media as their main sources for obtaining health information. PEH reported that effective communication products pair a recommended action with instructions and resources about how to take that action within their community.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings support healthcare providers collaborating with public health agencies to ensure that infectious disease prevention messages for PEH are provided by trusted messengers, multimodal, paired with resources, and consistent.</p>","PeriodicalId":509652,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"S340-S345"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9619659/pdf/jiac336.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiac336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: People experiencing homelessness (PEH) are disproportionately affected by many infectious diseases, including coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, communication efforts during public health emergencies like the COVID-19 pandemic often do not consider the unique needs of PEH. We examined how PEH seek and receive health information and how traditional health communication methods resonate with them.

Methods: We conducted in-person focus groups with PEH in 4 jurisdictions (Cincinnati, Ohio; Denver, Colorado; Sacramento, California; and the Bronx, New York) during July 2021.

Results: Findings from 15 focus groups with PEH (n = 53) revealed the need for trusted messengers and consistent messaging across local organizations, as PEH seek to verify information they receive from multiple sources. PEH overwhelmingly preferred to receive health information through face-to-face conversations, especially with healthcare providers with whom they had an established relationship, but they also cited news media, the internet, and social media as their main sources for obtaining health information. PEH reported that effective communication products pair a recommended action with instructions and resources about how to take that action within their community.

Conclusions: These findings support healthcare providers collaborating with public health agencies to ensure that infectious disease prevention messages for PEH are provided by trusted messengers, multimodal, paired with resources, and consistent.

与无家可归者有效沟通,预防传染病。
背景:无家可归者(PEH)不成比例地受到许多传染病的影响,包括2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)。然而,在COVID-19大流行等突发公共卫生事件期间的沟通工作往往没有考虑到PEH的独特需求。我们研究了PEH如何寻求和接收健康信息,以及传统的健康沟通方法如何与他们产生共鸣。方法:我们在4个司法管辖区(辛辛那提,俄亥俄州;科罗拉多州丹佛市;萨克拉曼多,加州;和纽约布朗克斯),2021年7月。结果:来自15个PEH焦点小组(n = 53)的调查结果显示,由于PEH试图验证他们从多个来源收到的信息,因此需要可信的信使和跨本地组织的一致消息传递。绝大多数PEH更喜欢通过面对面的对话来获取健康信息,特别是与与他们建立了关系的医疗保健提供者,但他们也将新闻媒体、互联网和社交媒体作为获取健康信息的主要来源。PEH报告说,有效的沟通产品将建议的行动与如何在其社区内采取行动的说明和资源相结合。结论:这些发现支持卫生保健提供者与公共卫生机构合作,以确保PEH的传染病预防信息是由可信赖的信使提供的,多模式的,与资源配对的,一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信