Interprofessional On-floor Education on Oxygen Therapy in COVID-19 Patients, Cardiac Arrest, and Procedural Sedation: Perception of Health-care Workers in Emergency Setting.

IF 1.5 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Open Access Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2022-09-30 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAEM.S349656
Munawar Farooq, Shabbir Ahmad, Faisal K Hanjra, Obaidullah Zafar, Khalid Bashir
{"title":"Interprofessional On-floor Education on Oxygen Therapy in COVID-19 Patients, Cardiac Arrest, and Procedural Sedation: Perception of Health-care Workers in Emergency Setting.","authors":"Munawar Farooq,&nbsp;Shabbir Ahmad,&nbsp;Faisal K Hanjra,&nbsp;Obaidullah Zafar,&nbsp;Khalid Bashir","doi":"10.2147/OAEM.S349656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is paucity of evidence for interprofessional education (IPE) conducted within the working environment of emergency departments (EDs). This study demonstrates favorable perception of on-floor IPE sessions conducted in a busy emergency department.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between January and December 2020, IPE was conducted in EDs using low fidelity manikins and involved nurses, doctors, respiratory therapists, and medical students already present on floor. The three key areas were, taught cardiac arrest, escalating oxygen therapy for COVID-19 patients, and procedural sedation. Each session lasted 30 min, and feedback was obtained immediately after the session in both transcribed and written forms through scannable survey monkey links.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven sessions were conducted covering the three topics for 141 participants. The majority of the participants benefited from on-floor IPE and preferred this approach in the future. Both participant and faculty recommended to have some protected time to maximize the learnings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IPE in the clinical environment is feasible, with careful planning it can enhance collaborative learning in the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":45096,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/19/32/oaem-14-535.PMC9531615.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S349656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: There is paucity of evidence for interprofessional education (IPE) conducted within the working environment of emergency departments (EDs). This study demonstrates favorable perception of on-floor IPE sessions conducted in a busy emergency department.

Materials and methods: Between January and December 2020, IPE was conducted in EDs using low fidelity manikins and involved nurses, doctors, respiratory therapists, and medical students already present on floor. The three key areas were, taught cardiac arrest, escalating oxygen therapy for COVID-19 patients, and procedural sedation. Each session lasted 30 min, and feedback was obtained immediately after the session in both transcribed and written forms through scannable survey monkey links.

Results: Forty-seven sessions were conducted covering the three topics for 141 participants. The majority of the participants benefited from on-floor IPE and preferred this approach in the future. Both participant and faculty recommended to have some protected time to maximize the learnings.

Conclusion: IPE in the clinical environment is feasible, with careful planning it can enhance collaborative learning in the ED.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

COVID-19患者氧疗、心脏骤停和程序性镇静的跨专业现场教育:急诊医护人员的看法
目的:在急诊科(EDs)的工作环境中开展跨专业教育(IPE)的证据不足。本研究表明,在繁忙的急诊科进行现场IPE会议的良好看法。材料和方法:在2020年1月至12月期间,IPE使用低保真假人模型在急诊室进行,涉及护士、医生、呼吸治疗师和已经在场的医学生。三个关键领域是:心脏骤停、COVID-19患者逐步氧疗和程序性镇静。每次会话持续30分钟,并在会话结束后立即通过可扫描的调查猴子链接以转录和书面形式获得反馈。结果:共进行了47次会议,涉及三个主题,141名参与者。大多数参与者受益于现场IPE,并在未来更喜欢这种方法。参与者和教师都建议有一些受保护的时间来最大限度地学习。结论:IPE在临床环境下是可行的,经过精心策划可以促进ED的协同学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Access Emergency Medicine
Open Access Emergency Medicine EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信