{"title":"Assessing Acute Responses to Exercises Performed Within and at the Upper Boundary of Severe Exercise Domain.","authors":"Mahdi Norouzi, Refik Cabuk, Gorkem Aybars Balci, Hakan As, Ozgur Ozkaya","doi":"10.1080/02701367.2022.2117268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>: The highest work-rate that provides maximal oxygen uptake (<math><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover><mrow><msub><mi>O</mi><mrow><mn>2</mn><mi>m</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>x</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math>) may be one of the best exercise stimuli to yield both <math><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover><msub><mrow><msub><mi>O</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></mrow><mrow><mi>m</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>x</mi></mrow></msub></math> and lactate accumulation. The aim of this study was to analyze physiological and metabolic acute responses of an exercise modality performed at the upper boundary of the severe exercise domain, and compare those responses with exercise modalities applied within the severe exercise domain. <b>Method</b>: Ten trained male cyclists participated in this study. The <math><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover><mrow><msub><mi>O</mi><mrow><mn>2</mn><mi>m</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>x</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math>, corresponding power output (PO<sub>VO2max</sub>), and the highest work-rate that provides the <math><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover><mrow><msub><mi>O</mi><mrow><mn>2</mn><mi>m</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>x</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math> (I<sub>HIGH</sub>) were determined by constant work-rate exercises. Cyclists performed three high-intensity interval training (HIIT) strategies as follows; HIIT-1: 4-6 × 3-min at 95% of PO<sub>VO2max</sub> with 1:1 (workout/rest ratio); HIIT-2: 16-18 × 1-min at 105% of PO<sub>VO2max</sub> with 1:1; HIIT-3: 4-7 × 1-2-min at the I<sub>HIGH</sub> with 1:2. Capillary blood samples were analyzed before, immediately after HIIT sessions, and at the first, third, and fifth minutes of recovery periods. Lactate difference between the highest lactate response and resting status was considered as the peak lactate response for each HIIT modality. <b>Results</b>: Time spent at <math><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover><mrow><msub><mi>O</mi><mrow><mn>2</mn><mi>m</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>x</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math> was greater at HIIT-1 and HIIT-3 (272 ± 127 and 208 ± 111 seconds, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.155; effect size = 0.43) when compared to the HIIT-2 (~26 seconds; <i>p</i> < 0.001), while there was a greater lactate accumulation at HIIT-3 (~16 mmol·L<sup>-1</sup>) when compared to HIIT-1 and HIIT-2 (12 and 14 mmol·L<sup>-1</sup>, respectively; <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: In conclusion, HIIT-3 performed at I<sub>HIGH</sub> was successful to provide time spent at <math><mover><mi>V</mi><mo>˙</mo></mover><mrow><msub><mi>O</mi><mrow><mn>2</mn><mi>m</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>x</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math> with a greater lactate accumulation in a single session.</p>","PeriodicalId":54491,"journal":{"name":"Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2022.2117268","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The highest work-rate that provides maximal oxygen uptake () may be one of the best exercise stimuli to yield both and lactate accumulation. The aim of this study was to analyze physiological and metabolic acute responses of an exercise modality performed at the upper boundary of the severe exercise domain, and compare those responses with exercise modalities applied within the severe exercise domain. Method: Ten trained male cyclists participated in this study. The , corresponding power output (POVO2max), and the highest work-rate that provides the (IHIGH) were determined by constant work-rate exercises. Cyclists performed three high-intensity interval training (HIIT) strategies as follows; HIIT-1: 4-6 × 3-min at 95% of POVO2max with 1:1 (workout/rest ratio); HIIT-2: 16-18 × 1-min at 105% of POVO2max with 1:1; HIIT-3: 4-7 × 1-2-min at the IHIGH with 1:2. Capillary blood samples were analyzed before, immediately after HIIT sessions, and at the first, third, and fifth minutes of recovery periods. Lactate difference between the highest lactate response and resting status was considered as the peak lactate response for each HIIT modality. Results: Time spent at was greater at HIIT-1 and HIIT-3 (272 ± 127 and 208 ± 111 seconds, respectively; p = 0.155; effect size = 0.43) when compared to the HIIT-2 (~26 seconds; p < 0.001), while there was a greater lactate accumulation at HIIT-3 (~16 mmol·L-1) when compared to HIIT-1 and HIIT-2 (12 and 14 mmol·L-1, respectively; p < 0.001). Conclusions: In conclusion, HIIT-3 performed at IHIGH was successful to provide time spent at with a greater lactate accumulation in a single session.
期刊介绍:
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport publishes research in the art and science of human movement that contributes significantly to the knowledge base of the field as new information, reviews, substantiation or contradiction of previous findings, development of theory, or as application of new or improved techniques. The goals of RQES are to provide a scholarly outlet for knowledge that: (a) contributes to the study of human movement, particularly its cross-disciplinary and interdisciplinary nature; (b) impacts theory and practice regarding human movement; (c) stimulates research about human movement; and (d) provides theoretical reviews and tutorials related to the study of human movement. The editorial board, associate editors, and external reviewers assist the editor-in-chief. Qualified reviewers in the appropriate subdisciplines review manuscripts deemed suitable. Authors are usually advised of the decision on their papers within 75–90 days.