[Psychometric properties of the Monitoring of the Path of Rehabilitation (MPR) Form.]

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Alessandra Martinelli, Tecla Pozzan, Elisa Dal Corso, Elena Procura, Camilla D'Astore, Doriana Cristofalo, Mirella Ruggeri, Chiara Bonetto
{"title":"[Psychometric properties of the Monitoring of the Path of Rehabilitation (MPR) Form.]","authors":"Alessandra Martinelli,&nbsp;Tecla Pozzan,&nbsp;Elisa Dal Corso,&nbsp;Elena Procura,&nbsp;Camilla D'Astore,&nbsp;Doriana Cristofalo,&nbsp;Mirella Ruggeri,&nbsp;Chiara Bonetto","doi":"10.1708/3893.38745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The correct placement of people with mental disorders in psychiatric residential facilities (PRF) and the monitoring of their progress in these facilities is a critical issue that has not been fully settled in the Italian system. To overcome this problem, some validated instruments are used, which mostly assess the patient's functioning/disability, while no instruments have been set up to assess functional autonomy in patients with a psychiatric disorder residents in RFs. The Verona Department of Mental Health has created the Monitoring of the Path of Rehabilitation (MPR) Form with the aim of assessing the functional autonomy of patients to admit and monitor them adequately in their residential pathways. The aim of this study is to test the main psychometric properties of the MPR Form.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study of the psychometric properties of the MPR Form consisted of three steps: an evaluation conducted more than 15 days apart by two independent evaluators on 18 clinical cases to investigate the test-retest reliability; a test of the 18 clinical cases by the two evaluators to measure the inter-rater rieliability; a measure of convergent validity using the Personal and Social Functioning Scale. Eight professionals completed a satisfaction questionnaire regarding the acceptability of the MPR Form. Inter-rater and test-retest analyses were conducted using intraclass correlation coefficients. Convergent validity was investigated using Kendall's tau-b rank correlation coefficient and acceptability using a frequency analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inter-rater and test-retest reliability were good, as well for concurrent validity and acceptability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The data presented in this article demonstrate that it is possible to measure the functional autonomy of patients in Italian SRPs using the MPR Form.</p>","PeriodicalId":21506,"journal":{"name":"Rivista di psichiatria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rivista di psichiatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1708/3893.38745","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The correct placement of people with mental disorders in psychiatric residential facilities (PRF) and the monitoring of their progress in these facilities is a critical issue that has not been fully settled in the Italian system. To overcome this problem, some validated instruments are used, which mostly assess the patient's functioning/disability, while no instruments have been set up to assess functional autonomy in patients with a psychiatric disorder residents in RFs. The Verona Department of Mental Health has created the Monitoring of the Path of Rehabilitation (MPR) Form with the aim of assessing the functional autonomy of patients to admit and monitor them adequately in their residential pathways. The aim of this study is to test the main psychometric properties of the MPR Form.

Methods: The study of the psychometric properties of the MPR Form consisted of three steps: an evaluation conducted more than 15 days apart by two independent evaluators on 18 clinical cases to investigate the test-retest reliability; a test of the 18 clinical cases by the two evaluators to measure the inter-rater rieliability; a measure of convergent validity using the Personal and Social Functioning Scale. Eight professionals completed a satisfaction questionnaire regarding the acceptability of the MPR Form. Inter-rater and test-retest analyses were conducted using intraclass correlation coefficients. Convergent validity was investigated using Kendall's tau-b rank correlation coefficient and acceptability using a frequency analysis.

Results: Inter-rater and test-retest reliability were good, as well for concurrent validity and acceptability.

Conclusions: The data presented in this article demonstrate that it is possible to measure the functional autonomy of patients in Italian SRPs using the MPR Form.

康复路径监测(MPR)表的心理测量学特征
目的:将精神障碍患者正确安置在精神病院(PRF)并监测他们在这些设施中的进展是一个关键问题,在意大利的制度中尚未得到充分解决。为了克服这个问题,使用了一些经过验证的仪器,这些仪器大多用于评估患者的功能/残疾,而没有仪器用于评估RFs住院患者的精神障碍患者的功能自主性。维罗纳精神卫生司制定了康复路径监测表,目的是评估病人的功能自主权,以便在住院过程中对他们进行充分监测。本研究的目的是测试MPR表格的主要心理测量特性。方法:MPR表心理测量学性质的研究分三步进行:由两名独立评估者对18例临床病例进行间隔15天以上的评估,考察重测信度;由两名评估者对18例临床病例进行检验,以衡量评估者之间的信度;使用个人和社会功能量表测量收敛效度。八名专业人员完成了一份关于MPR表格可接受性的满意度问卷。采用类内相关系数进行评间和重测分析。采用Kendall的tau-b等级相关系数和频率分析的可接受性来研究收敛效度。结果:量表间信度和重测信度良好,并发效度和可接受度良好。结论:本文提供的数据表明,使用MPR表格可以测量意大利srp患者的功能自主性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rivista di psichiatria
Rivista di psichiatria 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.70%
发文量
31
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gli interessi della rivista riguardano l’approfondimento delle interazioni tra mente e malattia, la validazione e la discussione dei nuovi strumenti e parametri di classificazione diagnostica, la verifica delle prospettive terapeutiche farmacologiche e non.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信