A Multi-Site Survey Study of Patient Satisfaction with Teledermatology.

Kansas Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2022-09-21 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17161/kjm.vol15.18073
Christy Nwankwo, Jessica E Houpe, Bao Vincent K Ho, Edward W Seger, Dominic J Wu, Anand Rajpara
{"title":"A Multi-Site Survey Study of Patient Satisfaction with Teledermatology.","authors":"Christy Nwankwo,&nbsp;Jessica E Houpe,&nbsp;Bao Vincent K Ho,&nbsp;Edward W Seger,&nbsp;Dominic J Wu,&nbsp;Anand Rajpara","doi":"10.17161/kjm.vol15.18073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Telemedicine has been of heightened focus due to spikes in usage during the COVID-19 pandemic. Disparities in health care may affect patient satisfaction with this resource depending on factors such as patient race, age, or socioeconomic background. The purpose of this study was to analyze patient satisfaction with teledermatology to identify any differences in satisfaction based on race, age, and income during the COVID-19 pandemic period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 21-question, IRB-approved survey was administered to patients at two academic dermatology clinics in Kansas City. Patient satisfaction was measured using a five-point Likert scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 64 completed surveys were analyzed (17.8% response rate). Most of the participants were female (n = 48, 75%), age 45 to 60 (n = 17, 26.6%), and reported White for race (n = 55, 85.9%). Overall, 73.4% (n = 47) of patients reported being satisfied with their visit. However, only 38.7% (n = 24) of participants were likely to choose a video over an in-person visit. Reasons for low patient satisfaction included concerns regarding ability to perform an accurate physical exam with a video visit (n = 9, 14.1%), receiving inadequate care (n = 4, 6.3%), protected privacy (n = 3, 4.7%), and provider understanding the patient (n = 2, 3.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings were similar to prior studies stating no difference in patient satisfaction with regards to age, income, or race and patients reporting high satisfaction with teledermatology appointments despite a preference for in-person dermatology visits. Future studies with a larger diverse cohort of participants are needed to elucidate and address possible disparities associated with teledermatology use.</p>","PeriodicalId":17991,"journal":{"name":"Kansas Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"307-310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8e/32/15-307.PMC9518716.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansas Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol15.18073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Telemedicine has been of heightened focus due to spikes in usage during the COVID-19 pandemic. Disparities in health care may affect patient satisfaction with this resource depending on factors such as patient race, age, or socioeconomic background. The purpose of this study was to analyze patient satisfaction with teledermatology to identify any differences in satisfaction based on race, age, and income during the COVID-19 pandemic period.

Methods: A 21-question, IRB-approved survey was administered to patients at two academic dermatology clinics in Kansas City. Patient satisfaction was measured using a five-point Likert scale.

Results: A total of 64 completed surveys were analyzed (17.8% response rate). Most of the participants were female (n = 48, 75%), age 45 to 60 (n = 17, 26.6%), and reported White for race (n = 55, 85.9%). Overall, 73.4% (n = 47) of patients reported being satisfied with their visit. However, only 38.7% (n = 24) of participants were likely to choose a video over an in-person visit. Reasons for low patient satisfaction included concerns regarding ability to perform an accurate physical exam with a video visit (n = 9, 14.1%), receiving inadequate care (n = 4, 6.3%), protected privacy (n = 3, 4.7%), and provider understanding the patient (n = 2, 3.1%).

Conclusions: Our findings were similar to prior studies stating no difference in patient satisfaction with regards to age, income, or race and patients reporting high satisfaction with teledermatology appointments despite a preference for in-person dermatology visits. Future studies with a larger diverse cohort of participants are needed to elucidate and address possible disparities associated with teledermatology use.

远程皮肤科患者满意度的多地点调查研究。
导语:由于在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间远程医疗的使用激增,远程医疗受到了高度关注。根据患者的种族、年龄或社会经济背景等因素,医疗保健方面的差异可能会影响患者对该资源的满意度。本研究的目的是分析患者对远程皮肤科的满意度,以确定在COVID-19大流行期间,基于种族、年龄和收入的满意度差异。方法:在堪萨斯城的两个学术皮肤科诊所对患者进行21个问题的irb批准调查。患者满意度采用李克特五点量表进行测量。结果:共分析64份问卷,回复率为17.8%。大多数参与者为女性(n = 48, 75%),年龄在45至60岁之间(n = 17, 26.6%),种族为白人(n = 55, 85.9%)。总体而言,73.4% (n = 47)的患者报告对他们的就诊感到满意。然而,只有38.7% (n = 24)的参与者可能会选择视频而不是亲自访问。患者满意度低的原因包括担心通过视频访问进行准确体检的能力(n = 9, 14.1%),接受不充分的护理(n = 4, 6.3%),隐私保护(n = 3, 4.7%)和提供者了解患者(n = 2, 3.1%)。结论:我们的研究结果与之前的研究相似,表明患者的满意度在年龄、收入或种族方面没有差异,尽管患者更喜欢亲自去皮肤科就诊,但他们对远程皮肤科预约的满意度很高。未来的研究需要更大的多样化的参与者队列来阐明和解决与远程皮肤科使用相关的可能差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信