Cerebral blood flow alterations in migraine patients with and without aura: An arterial spin labeling study.

Tong Fu, Lindong Liu, Xiaobin Huang, Di Zhang, Yujia Gao, Xindao Yin, Hai Lin, Yongming Dai, Xinying Wu
{"title":"Cerebral blood flow alterations in migraine patients with and without aura: An arterial spin labeling study.","authors":"Tong Fu,&nbsp;Lindong Liu,&nbsp;Xiaobin Huang,&nbsp;Di Zhang,&nbsp;Yujia Gao,&nbsp;Xindao Yin,&nbsp;Hai Lin,&nbsp;Yongming Dai,&nbsp;Xinying Wu","doi":"10.1186/s10194-022-01501-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Migraine aura is a transient, fully reversible visual, sensory, or other central nervous system symptom that classically precedes migraine headache. This study aimed to investigate cerebral blood flow (CBF) alterations of migraine with aura patients (MwA) and without aura patients (MwoA) during inter-ictal periods, using arterial spin labeling (ASL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated 88 migraine patients (32 MwA) and 44 healthy control subjects (HC) who underwent a three-dimensional pseudo-continuous ASL MRI scanning. Voxel-based comparison of normalized CBF was conducted between MwA and MwoA. The relationship between CBF variation and clinical scale assessment was further analyzed. The mean CBF values in brain regions showed significant differences were calculated and considered as imaging features. Based on these features, different machine learning-based models were established to differentiate MwA and MwoA under five-fold cross validation. The predictive ability of the optimal model was further tested in an independent sample of 30 migraine patients (10 MwA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In comparison to MwoA and HC, MwA exhibited higher CBF levels in the bilateral superior frontal gyrus, bilateral postcentral gyrus and cerebellum, and lower CBF levels in the bilateral middle frontal gyrus, thalamus and medioventral occipital cortex (all p values < 0.05). These variations were also significantly correlated with multiple clinical rating scales about headache severity, quality of life and emotion. On basis of these CBF features, the accuracies and areas under curve of the final model in the training and testing samples were 84.3% and 0.872, 83.3% and 0.860 in discriminating patients with and without aura, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, CBF abnormalities of MwA were identified in multiple brain regions, which might help better understand migraine-stroke connection mechanisms and may guide patient-specific decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":501630,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":" ","pages":"131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9531478/pdf/","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Headache and Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-022-01501-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background: Migraine aura is a transient, fully reversible visual, sensory, or other central nervous system symptom that classically precedes migraine headache. This study aimed to investigate cerebral blood flow (CBF) alterations of migraine with aura patients (MwA) and without aura patients (MwoA) during inter-ictal periods, using arterial spin labeling (ASL).

Methods: We evaluated 88 migraine patients (32 MwA) and 44 healthy control subjects (HC) who underwent a three-dimensional pseudo-continuous ASL MRI scanning. Voxel-based comparison of normalized CBF was conducted between MwA and MwoA. The relationship between CBF variation and clinical scale assessment was further analyzed. The mean CBF values in brain regions showed significant differences were calculated and considered as imaging features. Based on these features, different machine learning-based models were established to differentiate MwA and MwoA under five-fold cross validation. The predictive ability of the optimal model was further tested in an independent sample of 30 migraine patients (10 MwA).

Results: In comparison to MwoA and HC, MwA exhibited higher CBF levels in the bilateral superior frontal gyrus, bilateral postcentral gyrus and cerebellum, and lower CBF levels in the bilateral middle frontal gyrus, thalamus and medioventral occipital cortex (all p values < 0.05). These variations were also significantly correlated with multiple clinical rating scales about headache severity, quality of life and emotion. On basis of these CBF features, the accuracies and areas under curve of the final model in the training and testing samples were 84.3% and 0.872, 83.3% and 0.860 in discriminating patients with and without aura, respectively.

Conclusion: In this study, CBF abnormalities of MwA were identified in multiple brain regions, which might help better understand migraine-stroke connection mechanisms and may guide patient-specific decision-making.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

有或无先兆偏头痛患者的脑血流改变:一项动脉自旋标记研究。
背景:偏头痛先兆是一种短暂的、完全可逆的视觉、感觉或其他中枢神经系统症状,通常发生在偏头痛之前。本研究旨在通过动脉自旋标记(ASL)研究偏头痛有先兆患者(MwA)和无先兆患者(MwoA)在发作间期的脑血流量(CBF)变化。方法:对88例偏头痛患者(32例MwA)和44例健康对照(HC)进行三维伪连续ASL MRI扫描。在MwA和MwoA之间进行了基于体素的归一化CBF比较。进一步分析CBF变异与临床量表评定的关系。计算有显著差异的脑区平均脑血流值作为影像学特征。基于这些特征,在五重交叉验证下,建立了不同的机器学习模型来区分MwA和MwoA。在30例偏头痛患者(10 MwA)的独立样本中进一步测试了最佳模型的预测能力。结果:与MwoA和HC相比,MwA在双侧额上回、双侧中央后回和小脑表现出较高的CBF水平,而在双侧额中回、丘脑和枕中腹侧皮层表现出较低的CBF水平(p值均为p值)。结论:本研究发现MwA的多脑区CBF异常,有助于更好地了解偏头痛与卒中的联系机制,并为患者的具体决策提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信