A Feeling of Ambiguity: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Managers' Experiences of Evidence-Based Practice in Swedish Primary Care.

IF 3.4 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Healthcare Leadership Pub Date : 2022-09-19 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JHL.S371643
Tobias Abelsson, Ann-Kristin Karlsson, Helena Morténius
{"title":"A Feeling of Ambiguity: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Managers' Experiences of Evidence-Based Practice in Swedish Primary Care.","authors":"Tobias Abelsson,&nbsp;Ann-Kristin Karlsson,&nbsp;Helena Morténius","doi":"10.2147/JHL.S371643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Primary care manager plays a vital role in promoting a research culture in the healthcare center. The position involves both the implementation of organizational directives and patient care. The research culture and use of evidence influence each individual healthcare professional and ultimately the quality of patient care.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe primary healthcare managers' understanding of evidence-based practice in the Swedish primary healthcare context and their ability to influence its implementation.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Qualitative content analysis of data collected in individual interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In general, managers expressed a positive view toward the use of evidence in daily practice. However, they were sometimes hesitant about fully implementing evidence-based results. This was mostly attributed to the struggle of balancing finances and allocating sufficient time for staff to keep up with and engage in evidence-based practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The organizational culture impacts the mind-set of all co-workers including managers. Those managers influenced by traditions and norms may fall into the trap of devaluing the benefit of research and evidence. The inherent feeling of being alone and without guidance in some matters related to evidence-based practice inevitably leads to inconsistency and ambiguity. The use of clinical pathways that constitute one form of evidence has become a substitute for proper, careful, individual investigation, implementation, and evaluation of each patient case. This means that managers experience moral and physical stress when trying to meet organizational, staff, and patient demands.</p><p><strong>Practice implication: </strong>Awareness of managers' influence and experience of working according to evidence-based practice is valuable to gain an insight into how Swedish primary healthcare functions at local level. Illuminating and discussing evidence-based practice is an assurance of quality that contributes to many aspects of the overall safety of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":44346,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Leadership","volume":" ","pages":"143-153"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/49/81/jhl-14-143.PMC9507276.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S371643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Primary care manager plays a vital role in promoting a research culture in the healthcare center. The position involves both the implementation of organizational directives and patient care. The research culture and use of evidence influence each individual healthcare professional and ultimately the quality of patient care.

Purpose: To describe primary healthcare managers' understanding of evidence-based practice in the Swedish primary healthcare context and their ability to influence its implementation.

Methodology: Qualitative content analysis of data collected in individual interviews.

Results: In general, managers expressed a positive view toward the use of evidence in daily practice. However, they were sometimes hesitant about fully implementing evidence-based results. This was mostly attributed to the struggle of balancing finances and allocating sufficient time for staff to keep up with and engage in evidence-based practice.

Conclusion: The organizational culture impacts the mind-set of all co-workers including managers. Those managers influenced by traditions and norms may fall into the trap of devaluing the benefit of research and evidence. The inherent feeling of being alone and without guidance in some matters related to evidence-based practice inevitably leads to inconsistency and ambiguity. The use of clinical pathways that constitute one form of evidence has become a substitute for proper, careful, individual investigation, implementation, and evaluation of each patient case. This means that managers experience moral and physical stress when trying to meet organizational, staff, and patient demands.

Practice implication: Awareness of managers' influence and experience of working according to evidence-based practice is valuable to gain an insight into how Swedish primary healthcare functions at local level. Illuminating and discussing evidence-based practice is an assurance of quality that contributes to many aspects of the overall safety of care.

一种模糊的感觉:瑞典初级保健管理者循证实践经验的定性内容分析。
背景:初级保健经理在促进医疗保健中心的研究文化中起着至关重要的作用。该职位涉及组织指令的实施和病人护理。研究文化和证据的使用影响着每个医疗保健专业人员,并最终影响着患者护理的质量。目的:描述初级卫生保健管理者对瑞典初级卫生保健背景下循证实践的理解及其影响其实施的能力。方法:对个人访谈中收集的数据进行定性内容分析。结果:总体而言,管理者对在日常实践中使用证据持积极态度。然而,他们有时对充分实施循证结果犹豫不决。这主要归因于平衡财务和分配足够的时间让工作人员跟上并参与循证实践的斗争。结论:组织文化影响包括管理者在内的所有同事的思维方式。那些受传统和规范影响的管理者可能会落入低估研究和证据的好处的陷阱。在一些与循证实践有关的问题上,固有的孤独和没有指导的感觉不可避免地导致不一致和模棱两可。使用构成一种证据形式的临床途径已成为对每个患者病例进行适当、仔细、个别调查、实施和评估的替代品。这意味着管理者在努力满足组织、员工和病人的需求时,会经历精神和身体上的压力。实践含义:了解管理人员的影响和根据循证实践工作的经验,对于深入了解瑞典基层卫生保健如何在地方一级发挥作用很有价值。启发和讨论基于证据的实践是质量的保证,有助于护理的整体安全的许多方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Healthcare Leadership
Journal of Healthcare Leadership HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Efficient and successful modern healthcare depends on a growing group of professionals working together as an interdisciplinary team. However, many forces shape the delivery of healthcare; changes are being driven by the markets, transformations in concepts of health and wellbeing, technology and research and discovery. Dynamic leadership will guide these necessary transformations. The Journal of Healthcare Leadership is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on leadership for the healthcare professions. The publication strives to amalgamate current and future healthcare professionals and managers by providing key insights into leadership progress and challenges to improve patient care. The journal aspires to inform key decision makers and those professionals with ambitions of leadership and management; it seeks to connect professionals who are engaged in similar endeavours and to provide wisdom from those working in other industries. Senior and trainee doctors, nurses and allied healthcare professionals, medical students, healthcare managers and allied leaders are invited to contribute to this publication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信