Spike Arm Swing Techniques of Olympics Male and Female Elite Volleyball Players (1984-2021).

IF 2.4
George Giatsis, Markus Tilp
{"title":"Spike Arm Swing Techniques of Olympics Male and Female Elite Volleyball Players (1984-2021).","authors":"George Giatsis,&nbsp;Markus Tilp","doi":"10.52082/jssm.2022.465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the last decades, indoor volleyball has experienced significant rule changes and a high player specialization in both sexes. Different spike attack arm swing techniques have developed which might affect performance and risk of injury. While a variety of arm swing techniques was already shown in world class beach volleyball players, it is unclear if this is also true for world class indoor volleyball. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the spike attack arm swing techniques of Olympic volleyball winners and finalists (1984-2021) and to investigate possible differences between sex, playing position, scoring system, and compared to beach volleyball. Eighty-two male (M) and 85 female (F) players were assessed from video recordings from ten competitions. Five different arm swing techniques in the cocking phase (Straight, Bow-and-arrow high, Bow-and-arrow low, Snap, Circular) were classified by two experts. The most frequent technique for both sexes was the Circular (M = 40.2%; F = 38.8%), followed by Snap (M = 28.0%; F = 23.5%), Bow-and-arrow low (M = 20.7%; F = 21.2%), Bow-and-arrow high (M = 7.3% F = 11.8%), and Straight (M = 3.7%; F = 4.7%). Bow-and-arrow high and Straight techniques were significantly less used than other techniques in both sexes. There were no significant differences (p &gt; 0.05) in arm swing techniques between sexes, playing positions, and scoring system but significant differences (p &lt; 0.001) to beach volleyball. Although most volleyball textbooks only describe the Bow-and-arrow techniques, most of the world class indoor volleyball players used Circular and Snap arm swing techniques. Reasons for that could be the implicit knowledge of players (and coaches) regarding increased performance (ball speed) and injury prevention. Based on these results we suggest to critically revise arm swing technique training especially for young players and players with shoulder problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":520691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of sports science & medicine","volume":" ","pages":"465-472"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9459771/pdf/jssm-21-465.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of sports science & medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2022.465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In the last decades, indoor volleyball has experienced significant rule changes and a high player specialization in both sexes. Different spike attack arm swing techniques have developed which might affect performance and risk of injury. While a variety of arm swing techniques was already shown in world class beach volleyball players, it is unclear if this is also true for world class indoor volleyball. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the spike attack arm swing techniques of Olympic volleyball winners and finalists (1984-2021) and to investigate possible differences between sex, playing position, scoring system, and compared to beach volleyball. Eighty-two male (M) and 85 female (F) players were assessed from video recordings from ten competitions. Five different arm swing techniques in the cocking phase (Straight, Bow-and-arrow high, Bow-and-arrow low, Snap, Circular) were classified by two experts. The most frequent technique for both sexes was the Circular (M = 40.2%; F = 38.8%), followed by Snap (M = 28.0%; F = 23.5%), Bow-and-arrow low (M = 20.7%; F = 21.2%), Bow-and-arrow high (M = 7.3% F = 11.8%), and Straight (M = 3.7%; F = 4.7%). Bow-and-arrow high and Straight techniques were significantly less used than other techniques in both sexes. There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in arm swing techniques between sexes, playing positions, and scoring system but significant differences (p < 0.001) to beach volleyball. Although most volleyball textbooks only describe the Bow-and-arrow techniques, most of the world class indoor volleyball players used Circular and Snap arm swing techniques. Reasons for that could be the implicit knowledge of players (and coaches) regarding increased performance (ball speed) and injury prevention. Based on these results we suggest to critically revise arm swing technique training especially for young players and players with shoulder problems.

1984-2021年奥运会优秀男女排球运动员扣球臂挥拍技术研究。
在过去的几十年里,室内排球经历了重大的规则变化和男女运动员的高度专业化。不同的扣球攻击臂挥拍技术可能会影响表现和受伤的风险。虽然各种各样的手臂摆动技术已经在世界级的沙滩排球运动员中展示出来,但还不清楚这是否也适用于世界级的室内排球。因此,本研究的目的是评估奥运会排球冠军和决赛选手(1984-2021)的扣球攻击臂挥拍技术,并调查性别、比赛位置、计分系统之间可能存在的差异,并与沙滩排球进行比较。从10场比赛的录像中对82名男选手和85名女选手进行了评估。两名专家将上弦阶段的五种不同的手臂挥拍技术(直、高、低、快、圆)进行了分类。男女最常用的方法是环形法(M = 40.2%;F = 38.8%),其次是Snap (M = 28.0%;F = 23.5%),弓箭低(M = 20.7%;F = 21.2%)、弓箭高(M = 7.3% F = 11.8%)、直(M = 3.7%;F = 4.7%)。无论男女,弓箭式的“高”和“直”技术的使用率明显低于其他技术。差异无统计学意义(p >在不同性别、不同体位、不同计分制度之间,手臂挥拍技术差异有统计学意义(p <0.001)比沙滩排球高。虽然大多数排球教科书只描述了弓箭技术,但世界一流的室内排球运动员大多使用环形和快速手臂摆动技术。原因可能是球员(和教练)对提高表现(球速度)和预防受伤的隐性知识。基于这些结果,我们建议批判性地修改手臂挥拍技术训练,特别是对年轻球员和肩部有问题的球员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信