[Contested globalization: US and EU responses to China's rise as a high-tech powerLa mondialisation contestée : Réactions américaines et européennes face à la montée de la Chine dans le secteur des hautes technologies].

IF 1.3 3区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
Berliner Journal Fur Soziologie Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-19 DOI:10.1007/s11609-022-00481-x
Stefan Schmalz, Helena Gräf, Philipp Köncke, Lea Schneidemesser
{"title":"[Contested globalization: US and EU responses to China's rise as a high-tech powerLa mondialisation contestée : Réactions américaines et européennes face à la montée de la Chine dans le secteur des hautes technologies].","authors":"Stefan Schmalz,&nbsp;Helena Gräf,&nbsp;Philipp Köncke,&nbsp;Lea Schneidemesser","doi":"10.1007/s11609-022-00481-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rise of China has led to a series of conflicts with the leading Western countries. The reasons for these disputes are that Chinese corporations have become serious competitors for US and European companies and that there are diverging approaches of governing the market between Western and Chinese power elites. In China, political and economic power are organized differently than in the US and the EU. The party-state is the (partial) owner of important companies and openly intervenes in the national economy by five-year plans. Furthermore, the Communist Party of China is engaged in companies as a regulatory authority. At the same time, the party-state organizes its rule through output legitimacy and functions in many respects as an indicator-driven, meritocratic system. The expansion of hybrid Chinese party-state capitalism is therefore leading to a new system conflict. Economically, emerging Chinese (state-owned) enterprises are becoming competitors. Politically, the control of sensitive data flows and infrastructure networks is resulting in contention. The article analyzes current conflict dynamics between the US resp. the EU and China in the areas of foreign trade, investment, high technology, and industrial policy. Comparative political economy and world-system analysis guide the analysis. In each case, there are differences in the policy responses: The US has relied on aggressive trade and sanctions policies, while the EU has reacted more defensively. It is shown how these conflicts could change China's state-driven globalization strategy and contribute to the restructuring of the world economy.</p>","PeriodicalId":51909,"journal":{"name":"Berliner Journal Fur Soziologie","volume":" ","pages":"427-454"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9483887/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berliner Journal Fur Soziologie","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11609-022-00481-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The rise of China has led to a series of conflicts with the leading Western countries. The reasons for these disputes are that Chinese corporations have become serious competitors for US and European companies and that there are diverging approaches of governing the market between Western and Chinese power elites. In China, political and economic power are organized differently than in the US and the EU. The party-state is the (partial) owner of important companies and openly intervenes in the national economy by five-year plans. Furthermore, the Communist Party of China is engaged in companies as a regulatory authority. At the same time, the party-state organizes its rule through output legitimacy and functions in many respects as an indicator-driven, meritocratic system. The expansion of hybrid Chinese party-state capitalism is therefore leading to a new system conflict. Economically, emerging Chinese (state-owned) enterprises are becoming competitors. Politically, the control of sensitive data flows and infrastructure networks is resulting in contention. The article analyzes current conflict dynamics between the US resp. the EU and China in the areas of foreign trade, investment, high technology, and industrial policy. Comparative political economy and world-system analysis guide the analysis. In each case, there are differences in the policy responses: The US has relied on aggressive trade and sanctions policies, while the EU has reacted more defensively. It is shown how these conflicts could change China's state-driven globalization strategy and contribute to the restructuring of the world economy.

Abstract Image

[Contested全球化:US与曾回应质疑 powerLa全球化高科技to china’s rise as a:美国和欧洲的反应,面对中国崛起的高科技行业]。
中国的崛起导致了与西方主要国家的一系列冲突。这些争议的原因是中国公司已经成为美国和欧洲公司的严重竞争对手,西方和中国的权力精英在管理市场的方法上存在分歧。在中国,政治和经济权力的组织方式与美国和欧盟不同。党国是重要公司的(部分)所有者,并通过五年计划公开干预国民经济。此外,中国共产党作为监管机构参与公司事务。与此同时,党国通过输出合法性组织其统治,并在许多方面作为指标驱动的精英体系发挥作用。因此,中国混合党国资本主义的扩张导致了一种新的制度冲突。经济上,新兴的中国(国有)企业正在成为竞争对手。政治上,对敏感数据流和基础设施网络的控制引发了争论。本文分析了当前中美两国之间的冲突动态。欧盟和中国在外贸、投资、高科技和产业政策等领域的合作。比较政治经济学和世界体系分析指导了分析。在每一种情况下,政策反应都存在差异:美国依靠激进的贸易和制裁政策,而欧盟的反应则更为保守。它显示了这些冲突如何改变中国国家驱动的全球化战略,并有助于世界经济的重组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
27.30%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Berliner Journal für Soziologie (“Berlin Journal of Sociology”), edited by the Institute of Sociology at the Friedrich Schiller University Jena and the Institute of Social Sciences at the Humboldt University Berlin, publishes double-blind peer-reviewed articles on classical and modern theoretical approaches, essays on current problem areas of sociological discourse, and research notes presenting new empirical findings. Focussed issues and review essays reflect innovative developments within the German and international social sciences and inform about the state of research in central areas of sociology. The journal was founded in 1991 on the initiative of the East German Society of Sociology. It views itself as a general sociological journal that publishes contributions from all research and subject areas of sociology. From the very beginning, the programmatic aim has been to provide a forum for the discussion and further development of sociological problems in the light of contemporary theoretical and social developments. Two major topics have been at the journal''s core and will continue to shape its contents in the future: Transformation and Culture. The journal deals with the socio-ecological upheaval that modern societies are undergoing. Globalisation, changes in working society and lifestyles, digitalisation, social conflicts up to new wars, new challenges for democracy, populism and nationalism as well as gender relations are important topics of a renewed Great Transformation. Cultural sociology and comparative cultural research deal with developments in these fields in a special way. The BJS therefore continues to devote its attention to such perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信