Design for All - Design for Disabled: How important is anthropometry?

Gunther Paul, Isabella Tiziana Steffan, Nana Itoh, Richard Bowman, Bruce Bradtmiller
{"title":"Design for All - Design for Disabled: How important is anthropometry?","authors":"Gunther Paul,&nbsp;Isabella Tiziana Steffan,&nbsp;Nana Itoh,&nbsp;Richard Bowman,&nbsp;Bruce Bradtmiller","doi":"10.3233/WOR-211106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Design for All or Universal Design is a relatively new domain in Ergonomics. With globally ageing populations, it has however recently gained significant interest.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This position paper summarizes the outcomes of a workshop held at the virtual 21st Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association. The paper expands the horizon of traditional Ergonomics into a domain where people are differently abled and establishes a platform for the essential needs of future ergonomic standards which are required to inform inclusive design guidelines, or Design for All, extending the range of users.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The paper includes contributions from Asian, Australian, European and US workshop participants who are accessibility design experts in their respective geographic regions. The paper summarizes issues related to anthropometry in the Design for All, based on recent work in the US (Access board) and actual developments in various national and international accessibility standardization bodies, such as the Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand, the European Standardization Organization (EN 17210:2021; EN 17161:2019) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO 21542:2021 and BS ISO 7176-5:2008).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The paper concludes that despite the identification of a significant gap in knowledge of the anthropometry of people with disabilities as far back as 1990, work towards bridging the gap and enabling ergonomic standardization has not progressed since then globally. The lack of standardization in anthropometric data on people with a physical disability continues to complicate provision of data for mobility and accessibility design and hampers accessibility standardization efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":319034,"journal":{"name":"Work (Reading, Mass.)","volume":" ","pages":"S57-S65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work (Reading, Mass.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-211106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Design for All or Universal Design is a relatively new domain in Ergonomics. With globally ageing populations, it has however recently gained significant interest.

Objective: This position paper summarizes the outcomes of a workshop held at the virtual 21st Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association. The paper expands the horizon of traditional Ergonomics into a domain where people are differently abled and establishes a platform for the essential needs of future ergonomic standards which are required to inform inclusive design guidelines, or Design for All, extending the range of users.

Methods: The paper includes contributions from Asian, Australian, European and US workshop participants who are accessibility design experts in their respective geographic regions. The paper summarizes issues related to anthropometry in the Design for All, based on recent work in the US (Access board) and actual developments in various national and international accessibility standardization bodies, such as the Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand, the European Standardization Organization (EN 17210:2021; EN 17161:2019) and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO 21542:2021 and BS ISO 7176-5:2008).

Conclusions: The paper concludes that despite the identification of a significant gap in knowledge of the anthropometry of people with disabilities as far back as 1990, work towards bridging the gap and enabling ergonomic standardization has not progressed since then globally. The lack of standardization in anthropometric data on people with a physical disability continues to complicate provision of data for mobility and accessibility design and hampers accessibility standardization efforts.

为所有人设计——为残疾人设计:人体测量学有多重要?
背景:面向所有人的设计或通用设计是人体工程学中一个相对较新的领域。然而,随着全球人口老龄化,它最近引起了极大的兴趣。目的:本立场文件总结了在第21届国际人体工程学协会三年一度的虚拟大会上举行的研讨会的成果。本文将传统人机工程学的视野扩展到人们能力不同的领域,并为未来人机工程学标准的基本需求建立了一个平台,这些标准要求为包容性设计指南提供信息,或为所有人设计,扩大用户范围。方法:本文包括来自亚洲、澳大利亚、欧洲和美国的研讨会参与者的贡献,他们是各自地理区域的无障碍设计专家。本文基于美国(Access board)最近的工作以及各种国家和国际无障碍标准化机构的实际发展,总结了与全民设计(Design for All)中人体测量学相关的问题,如澳大利亚标准/新西兰标准、欧洲标准化组织(EN 17210:2021;EN 17161:2019)和国际标准化组织(ISO 21542:2021和BS ISO 7176-5:2008)。结论:该论文的结论是,尽管早在1990年就发现了残疾人人体测量学知识的重大差距,但从那时起,全球范围内缩小差距和实现人体工程学标准化的工作并没有取得进展。身体残疾人士的人体测量数据缺乏标准化,继续使提供移动性和无障碍设计的数据复杂化,并阻碍了无障碍标准化工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信