A Comparative Study of Two Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses.

Mi Yeon Song, Kyoung Hae Kang, Hun Lee, Tae-Im Kim, Kyungmin Koh
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Two Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses.","authors":"Mi Yeon Song,&nbsp;Kyoung Hae Kang,&nbsp;Hun Lee,&nbsp;Tae-Im Kim,&nbsp;Kyungmin Koh","doi":"10.1097/ICL.0000000000000931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess and compare the visual performance of two extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses (IOLs), Tecnis Symfony (Symfony; Johnson & Johnson Vision, Santa Ana, CA) and Acrysof IQ Vivity (Vivity; Alcon Inc, Fort Worth, TX).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of patients undergoing cataract surgery with Symfony or Vivity implantation from May 2021 to September 2021 and the data available for the 3-month follow-up were reviewed. The main measures of the findings were uncorrected and corrected distance (4 m) visual acuity (VA), uncorrected intermediate (66 cm) VA (UIVA) and uncorrected near (40 and 33 cm) VA (UNVA), refractive error (RE), defocus profiles analysis, optical quality parameters, and patient-reported quality of vision questionnaire results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 40 patients, 19 patients (31 eyes) were treated with the Symfony IOL and 21 (32 eyes) with the Vivity IOL. The mean age of the patients was 63.4±7.8 (range, 40-76) years in the Symfony group and 61.8±9.7 (range, 40-77) years in the Vivity group. There was no meaningful difference between the two groups in the preoperative parameters, except that the Vivity group had a better CDVA. Among the main measures of results, there was no statistically significant difference, except for the UNVA (33 cm). The Symfony group also showed a smoother defocus curve at 3 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding uncorrected/corrected distance VA, UIVA, UNVA (40 cm), RE, optical quality parameters, and patient-reported quality of vision questionnaire results. The Symfony group demonstrated a significantly superior UNVA (33 cm) and a smoother defocus curve with a broad landing zone.</p>","PeriodicalId":502139,"journal":{"name":"Eye & Contact Lens","volume":" ","pages":"433-438"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye & Contact Lens","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To assess and compare the visual performance of two extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses (IOLs), Tecnis Symfony (Symfony; Johnson & Johnson Vision, Santa Ana, CA) and Acrysof IQ Vivity (Vivity; Alcon Inc, Fort Worth, TX).

Methods: The medical records of patients undergoing cataract surgery with Symfony or Vivity implantation from May 2021 to September 2021 and the data available for the 3-month follow-up were reviewed. The main measures of the findings were uncorrected and corrected distance (4 m) visual acuity (VA), uncorrected intermediate (66 cm) VA (UIVA) and uncorrected near (40 and 33 cm) VA (UNVA), refractive error (RE), defocus profiles analysis, optical quality parameters, and patient-reported quality of vision questionnaire results.

Results: Of the 40 patients, 19 patients (31 eyes) were treated with the Symfony IOL and 21 (32 eyes) with the Vivity IOL. The mean age of the patients was 63.4±7.8 (range, 40-76) years in the Symfony group and 61.8±9.7 (range, 40-77) years in the Vivity group. There was no meaningful difference between the two groups in the preoperative parameters, except that the Vivity group had a better CDVA. Among the main measures of results, there was no statistically significant difference, except for the UNVA (33 cm). The Symfony group also showed a smoother defocus curve at 3 months postoperatively.

Conclusion: There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding uncorrected/corrected distance VA, UIVA, UNVA (40 cm), RE, optical quality parameters, and patient-reported quality of vision questionnaire results. The Symfony group demonstrated a significantly superior UNVA (33 cm) and a smoother defocus curve with a broad landing zone.

两种扩焦深度人工晶体的比较研究。
目的:评价和比较Tecnis Symfony (Symfony;Johnson & Johnson Vision, Santa Ana, CA)和acryysof IQ Vivity (Vivity;爱尔康公司,沃斯堡,德克萨斯州)。方法:回顾我院2021年5月~ 2021年9月行白内障手术并行Symfony或Vivity植入术患者的病历及3个月的随访资料。结果的主要测量指标为未矫正和矫正距离(4 m)视力(VA)、未矫正的中间(66 cm)视力(UIVA)和未矫正的近(40和33 cm)视力(UNVA)、屈光不正(RE)、离焦剖面分析、光学质量参数和患者报告的视力质量问卷结果。结果:40例患者中,Symfony人工晶状体19例(31眼),Vivity人工晶状体21例(32眼)。Symfony组患者平均年龄为63.4±7.8岁(范围40-76岁),Vivity组患者平均年龄为61.8±9.7岁(范围40-77岁)。两组术前各项参数差异无统计学意义,仅Vivity组CDVA较好。在主要的测量结果中,除了UNVA(33厘米)外,没有统计学上的显著差异。Symfony组术后3个月离焦曲线更平滑。结论:两组在未矫正/矫正距离VA、uva、UNVA (40 cm)、RE、光学质量参数及患者报告的视力质量问卷结果方面无显著差异。Symfony组显示出明显优越的UNVA (33 cm)和更平滑的离焦曲线和更宽的着陆区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书