The effectiveness of a pain management programme on pain control and quality of life in patients with metastatic cancer.

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING
Apinya Prisutkul, Arunee Dechaphunkul, Tippawan Arundorn, Maliwan Songserm, Anongnart Ruangdam, Chirawadee Sathitruangsak
{"title":"The effectiveness of a pain management programme on pain control and quality of life in patients with metastatic cancer.","authors":"Apinya Prisutkul,&nbsp;Arunee Dechaphunkul,&nbsp;Tippawan Arundorn,&nbsp;Maliwan Songserm,&nbsp;Anongnart Ruangdam,&nbsp;Chirawadee Sathitruangsak","doi":"10.12968/ijpn.2022.28.9.436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pain is one of the most frequent symptoms in cancer patients and has a negative impact on their physical, emotional and functional status, as well as their quality of life (QOL). This study evaluated the effectiveness of a pain management programme on pain control and QOL among patients with metastatic cancer receiving systemic chemotherapy. The authors investigated whether a pain management programme contributes to a better pain control and improvement in QOL in the outpatient setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a randomised, single-blinded, controlled, single-centre study of metastatic cancer patients experiencing cancer pain and requiring opioid therapy. Patients were enrolled from the Medical Oncology Outpatient Clinic, Songklanagarind Hospital, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand. Participants were randomly assigned to two strategies: pain assessment and management based on the programme developed by the researchers ('pain management programme' arm), and pain management by individual medical oncologists per the routine procedure ('standard of care' arm). Demographics questionnaires, a pain intensity assessment using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G, version 4) were used to assess the QOL and cancer pain severity at baseline and at two follow-up visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between November 2016 and July 2017, 64 consecutive patients were randomly assigned to the two treatment groups. Most were male (79.7%), with a mean age of 55.1 (±13.8) years. The majority of patients (23; 35.9%) had squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, with other prevalent types being lung cancer (9.4%), esophageal cancer (9.4%) and colorectal cancer (9.4%). The most frequent metastatic sites were the lungs (28.1%), liver (26.6%), and bone (20.3%).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Compared with standard care, pain intensity was significantly lower among the patients receiving the pain management programme: 4.0 ±2.2 versus 5.1 ±1.8 (P = 0.033) and 3.3 ±1.7 versus 4.7 ±2.1 (P = 0.025) at visit 1 and 2, respectively. Likewise, QOL measures scored higher in the pain management programme group: 71.2 ±15.4 versus 58.6 ±14.5 (P = 0.002) and 71.8 ±15.5 versus 55.4 ±16.3 (P = 0.002) at visit 1 and 2, respectively. Furthermore, there was a statistically significant positive correlation between pain control and QOL improvement (P = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The investigated pain management programme significantly improved both pain control and QOL in metastatic cancer patients receiving systemic chemotherapy in the outpatient setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":47415,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Palliative Nursing","volume":"28 9","pages":"436-444"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Palliative Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2022.28.9.436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pain is one of the most frequent symptoms in cancer patients and has a negative impact on their physical, emotional and functional status, as well as their quality of life (QOL). This study evaluated the effectiveness of a pain management programme on pain control and QOL among patients with metastatic cancer receiving systemic chemotherapy. The authors investigated whether a pain management programme contributes to a better pain control and improvement in QOL in the outpatient setting.

Methods: The authors conducted a randomised, single-blinded, controlled, single-centre study of metastatic cancer patients experiencing cancer pain and requiring opioid therapy. Patients were enrolled from the Medical Oncology Outpatient Clinic, Songklanagarind Hospital, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand. Participants were randomly assigned to two strategies: pain assessment and management based on the programme developed by the researchers ('pain management programme' arm), and pain management by individual medical oncologists per the routine procedure ('standard of care' arm). Demographics questionnaires, a pain intensity assessment using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G, version 4) were used to assess the QOL and cancer pain severity at baseline and at two follow-up visits.

Results: Between November 2016 and July 2017, 64 consecutive patients were randomly assigned to the two treatment groups. Most were male (79.7%), with a mean age of 55.1 (±13.8) years. The majority of patients (23; 35.9%) had squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, with other prevalent types being lung cancer (9.4%), esophageal cancer (9.4%) and colorectal cancer (9.4%). The most frequent metastatic sites were the lungs (28.1%), liver (26.6%), and bone (20.3%).

Findings: Compared with standard care, pain intensity was significantly lower among the patients receiving the pain management programme: 4.0 ±2.2 versus 5.1 ±1.8 (P = 0.033) and 3.3 ±1.7 versus 4.7 ±2.1 (P = 0.025) at visit 1 and 2, respectively. Likewise, QOL measures scored higher in the pain management programme group: 71.2 ±15.4 versus 58.6 ±14.5 (P = 0.002) and 71.8 ±15.5 versus 55.4 ±16.3 (P = 0.002) at visit 1 and 2, respectively. Furthermore, there was a statistically significant positive correlation between pain control and QOL improvement (P = 0.011).

Conclusion: The investigated pain management programme significantly improved both pain control and QOL in metastatic cancer patients receiving systemic chemotherapy in the outpatient setting.

疼痛管理方案对转移性癌症患者疼痛控制和生活质量的有效性。
背景:疼痛是癌症患者最常见的症状之一,对患者的身体、情绪和功能状态以及生活质量都有负面影响。本研究评估疼痛管理方案对接受全身化疗的转移性癌症患者的疼痛控制和生活质量的有效性。作者调查了疼痛管理方案是否有助于门诊患者更好地控制疼痛和改善生活质量。方法:作者对经历癌性疼痛并需要阿片类药物治疗的转移性癌症患者进行了一项随机、单盲、对照、单中心研究。患者来自泰国宋卡王子大学宋卡王子医院肿瘤内科门诊。参与者被随机分配到两种策略:根据研究人员制定的方案进行疼痛评估和管理(“疼痛管理方案”组),以及根据常规程序由个别肿瘤医学专家进行疼痛管理(“标准护理”组)。在基线和两次随访时,使用人口统计问卷、使用数字评定量表(NRS)进行疼痛强度评估和癌症治疗功能评估(FACT-G,版本4)来评估生活质量和癌症疼痛严重程度。结果:2016年11月至2017年7月,连续64例患者随机分为两个治疗组。男性居多(79.7%),平均年龄55.1(±13.8)岁。大多数患者(23例;35.9%)为头颈部鳞状细胞癌,其他常见类型为肺癌(9.4%)、食管癌(9.4%)和结直肠癌(9.4%)。最常见的转移部位是肺(28.1%)、肝(26.6%)和骨(20.3%)。结果:与标准治疗相比,接受疼痛管理方案的患者疼痛强度显著降低:第一次和第二次就诊时分别为4.0±2.2比5.1±1.8 (P = 0.033)和3.3±1.7比4.7±2.1 (P = 0.025)。同样,疼痛管理方案组的生活质量评分更高:第一次和第二次就诊时分别为71.2±15.4比58.6±14.5 (P = 0.002)和71.8±15.5比55.4±16.3 (P = 0.002)。此外,疼痛控制与生活质量改善之间有统计学意义的正相关(P = 0.011)。结论:研究的疼痛管理方案显著改善了门诊接受全身化疗的转移性癌症患者的疼痛控制和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Since its launch in 1995, International Journal of Palliative Nursing (IJPN) has been committed to promoting excellence in palliative and hospice care. It is now established as the leading journal for nurses working in this most demanding profession, covering all aspects of palliative care nursing in a way which is intelligent, helpful and accessible, and so useful in daily practice. The aim of IJPN is to provide nurses with essential information to help them deliver the best possible care and support for their patients. Each issue contains an unparalleled range of peer-reviewed clinical, professional and educational articles, as well as helpful and informative information on practical, legal and policy issues of importance to all palliative nurses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信