The Effects of Foraging Ecology and Allometry on Avian Skull Shape Vary across Levels of Phylogeny.

The American Naturalist Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-26 DOI:10.1086/720745
Rossy Natale, Graham J Slater
{"title":"The Effects of Foraging Ecology and Allometry on Avian Skull Shape Vary across Levels of Phylogeny.","authors":"Rossy Natale,&nbsp;Graham J Slater","doi":"10.1086/720745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractAvian skull shape diversity is classically thought to result from selection for structures that are well adapted for distinct ecological functions, but recent work has suggested that allometry is the dominant contributor to avian morphological diversity. If true, this hypothesis would overturn much conventional wisdom regarding the importance of form-function relationships in adaptive radiations, but it is possible that these results are biased by the low taxonomic levels of the clades that have been studied. Using 3D morphometric data from the skulls of a relatively old and ecologically diverse order of birds, the Charadriiformes (shorebirds and relatives), we found that foraging ecology explains more than two-thirds of the variation in skull shape across the clade. However, we also found support for the hypothesis that skull allometry evolves, contributing more to shape variation at the level of the family than the order. Allometry may provide an important source of shape variation on which selection can act over short timescales, but its potential to evolve complicates generalizations between clades. Foraging ecology remains a better predictor of avian skull shape over macroevolutionary timescales.</p>","PeriodicalId":501264,"journal":{"name":"The American Naturalist","volume":" ","pages":"E174-E188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/720745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

AbstractAvian skull shape diversity is classically thought to result from selection for structures that are well adapted for distinct ecological functions, but recent work has suggested that allometry is the dominant contributor to avian morphological diversity. If true, this hypothesis would overturn much conventional wisdom regarding the importance of form-function relationships in adaptive radiations, but it is possible that these results are biased by the low taxonomic levels of the clades that have been studied. Using 3D morphometric data from the skulls of a relatively old and ecologically diverse order of birds, the Charadriiformes (shorebirds and relatives), we found that foraging ecology explains more than two-thirds of the variation in skull shape across the clade. However, we also found support for the hypothesis that skull allometry evolves, contributing more to shape variation at the level of the family than the order. Allometry may provide an important source of shape variation on which selection can act over short timescales, but its potential to evolve complicates generalizations between clades. Foraging ecology remains a better predictor of avian skull shape over macroevolutionary timescales.

觅食生态和异速生长对鸟类颅骨形状的影响在不同的系统发育水平上存在差异。
摘要:鸟类头骨形状的多样性通常被认为是对适应不同生态功能的结构进行选择的结果,但最近的研究表明,异速生长是鸟类形态多样性的主要贡献者。如果这个假设是正确的,那么这个假设将推翻许多关于形式-功能关系在适应性辐射中的重要性的传统智慧,但是有可能这些结果被已经研究的进化支的低分类水平所偏见。利用来自一个相对古老且生态多样的鸟类目——Charadriiformes(滨鸟及其近亲)头骨的三维形态测量数据,我们发现觅食生态学解释了超过三分之二的头骨形状在进化枝上的变化。然而,我们也发现了头骨异速进化的假设,在家族水平上比在顺序上对形状变化的贡献更大。异速生长可能提供了一个重要的形状变化来源,选择可以在短时间尺度上起作用,但它的进化潜力使进化分支之间的概括变得复杂。在宏观进化的时间尺度上,觅食生态学仍然是鸟类头骨形状的一个更好的预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信