Dispersal Increases Spatial Synchrony of Populations but Has Weak Effects on Population Variability: A Meta-analysis.

The American Naturalist Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-04 DOI:10.1086/720715
Qi Yang, Pubin Hong, Mingyu Luo, Lin Jiang, Shaopeng Wang
{"title":"Dispersal Increases Spatial Synchrony of Populations but Has Weak Effects on Population Variability: A Meta-analysis.","authors":"Qi Yang,&nbsp;Pubin Hong,&nbsp;Mingyu Luo,&nbsp;Lin Jiang,&nbsp;Shaopeng Wang","doi":"10.1086/720715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractThe effects of dispersal on spatial synchrony and population variability have been well documented in theoretical research, and a growing number of empirical tests have been performed. Yet a synthesis is still lacking. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis of relevant experiments and examined how dispersal affected spatial synchrony and temporal population variability across scales. Our analyses showed that dispersal generally promoted spatial synchrony, and such effects increased with dispersal rate and decreased with environmental correlation among patches. The synchronizing effect of dispersal, however, was detected only when spatial synchrony was measured using the correlation-based index, not when the covariance-based index was used. In contrast to theoretical predictions, the effect of dispersal on local population variability was generally nonsignificant, except when environmental correlation among patches was negative and/or the experimental period was long. At the regional scale, while low dispersal stabilized metapopulation dynamics, high dispersal led to destabilization. Overall, the sign and strength of dispersal effects on spatial synchrony and population variability were modulated by taxa, environmental heterogeneity, type of perturbations, patch number, and experimental length. Our synthesis demonstrates that dispersal can affect the dynamics of spatially distributed populations, but its effects are context dependent on abiotic and biotic factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":501264,"journal":{"name":"The American Naturalist","volume":" ","pages":"544-555"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/720715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

AbstractThe effects of dispersal on spatial synchrony and population variability have been well documented in theoretical research, and a growing number of empirical tests have been performed. Yet a synthesis is still lacking. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis of relevant experiments and examined how dispersal affected spatial synchrony and temporal population variability across scales. Our analyses showed that dispersal generally promoted spatial synchrony, and such effects increased with dispersal rate and decreased with environmental correlation among patches. The synchronizing effect of dispersal, however, was detected only when spatial synchrony was measured using the correlation-based index, not when the covariance-based index was used. In contrast to theoretical predictions, the effect of dispersal on local population variability was generally nonsignificant, except when environmental correlation among patches was negative and/or the experimental period was long. At the regional scale, while low dispersal stabilized metapopulation dynamics, high dispersal led to destabilization. Overall, the sign and strength of dispersal effects on spatial synchrony and population variability were modulated by taxa, environmental heterogeneity, type of perturbations, patch number, and experimental length. Our synthesis demonstrates that dispersal can affect the dynamics of spatially distributed populations, but its effects are context dependent on abiotic and biotic factors.

分散增加了种群的空间同步性,但对种群变异的影响较弱:一个元分析。
摘要迁移对空间同步性和种群变异的影响已经在理论研究中得到了充分的证明,并且越来越多的实证研究已经开始进行。然而,目前仍缺乏一种综合方法。在此,我们对相关实验进行了荟萃分析,并研究了分散如何影响空间同步性和跨尺度的时间种群变异。研究结果表明,分散总体上促进了斑块间的空间同步性,这种效应随分散速率的增加而增强,随环境相关性的降低而减弱。然而,只有当使用基于相关性的指数来测量空间同步性时,才会检测到分散的同步效应,而使用基于协方差的指数时则不会。与理论预测相反,除了斑块之间的环境相关性为负和/或实验周期较长外,分散对局部种群变异的影响一般不显著。在区域尺度上,低分散稳定了元种群动态,而高分散导致了不稳定。总体而言,分散效应对空间同步性和种群变异的影响程度和强度受分类群、环境异质性、扰动类型、斑块数量和实验长度的调节。我们的综合表明,扩散可以影响空间分布的种群动态,但其影响取决于非生物和生物因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信