Are SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests useful for the control of latest variants spreading?

Q2 Medicine
Infezioni in Medicina Pub Date : 2022-09-01 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.53854/liim-3003-11
Nadia Marascio, Angela Quirino, Giuseppe Guido Maria Scarlata, Giorgio Settimo Barreca, Aida Giancotti, Angelo Giuseppe Lamberti, Luigia Gallo, Fabio Foti, Domenico Luca Laurendi, Daniela Dattola, Antonino Marsico, Antonia La Rocca, Giovanni Matera
{"title":"Are SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests useful for the control of latest variants spreading?","authors":"Nadia Marascio, Angela Quirino, Giuseppe Guido Maria Scarlata, Giorgio Settimo Barreca, Aida Giancotti, Angelo Giuseppe Lamberti, Luigia Gallo, Fabio Foti, Domenico Luca Laurendi, Daniela Dattola, Antonino Marsico, Antonia La Rocca, Giovanni Matera","doi":"10.53854/liim-3003-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) conducted on nasopharyngeal swabs is the gold standard in the diagnosis of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In Italy, recent guidelines indicate that rapid antigen tests (RATs) can be used for the isolation of positive patients or for the interruption of quarantine, but they are often less sensitive to detect positive subjects. Indeed, the performance of these RATs depends on the timing and the population on which they are evaluated. Herein, we evaluated the performance of BIOCREDIT COVID-19 Ag and Fluorecare<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Test during a population screening in the Calabria Region, Southern Italy. We report that both antigen test shows low sensitivity in contrast to the high sensitivity declared by manufacturer (90% and 92%, respectively) and that the area under the curve (AUC) was good for Fluorecare<sup>®</sup> SARS-CoV- 2 Spike Protein Test but very poor for BIOCREDIT COVID-19 Ag. We suggest that these RATs should be re-evaluated in the current pandemic era.</p>","PeriodicalId":52423,"journal":{"name":"Infezioni in Medicina","volume":"30 3","pages":"427-431"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448309/pdf/1124-9390_30_3_2022_427-431.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infezioni in Medicina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53854/liim-3003-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) conducted on nasopharyngeal swabs is the gold standard in the diagnosis of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In Italy, recent guidelines indicate that rapid antigen tests (RATs) can be used for the isolation of positive patients or for the interruption of quarantine, but they are often less sensitive to detect positive subjects. Indeed, the performance of these RATs depends on the timing and the population on which they are evaluated. Herein, we evaluated the performance of BIOCREDIT COVID-19 Ag and Fluorecare® SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Test during a population screening in the Calabria Region, Southern Italy. We report that both antigen test shows low sensitivity in contrast to the high sensitivity declared by manufacturer (90% and 92%, respectively) and that the area under the curve (AUC) was good for Fluorecare® SARS-CoV- 2 Spike Protein Test but very poor for BIOCREDIT COVID-19 Ag. We suggest that these RATs should be re-evaluated in the current pandemic era.

SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测对控制最新变种的传播是否有用?
对鼻咽拭子进行反转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)是诊断严重急性呼吸系统综合症冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的黄金标准。意大利最近的指导方针指出,快速抗原检测(RAT)可用于隔离阳性患者或中断检疫,但其检测阳性受试者的灵敏度往往较低。事实上,这些快速抗原检测的性能取决于对其进行评估的时间和人群。在此,我们评估了 BIOCREDIT COVID-19 Ag 和 Fluorecare® SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Test 在意大利南部卡拉布里亚大区人群筛查中的表现。我们发现,这两种抗原检验的灵敏度都很低,与生产商宣称的高灵敏度(分别为 90% 和 92%)形成鲜明对比;Fluorecare® SARS-CoV- 2 Spike 蛋白检验的曲线下面积(AUC)很好,而 BIOCREDIT COVID-19 Ag 的曲线下面积很差。我们建议在当前的大流行时期对这些 RAT 进行重新评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infezioni in Medicina
Infezioni in Medicina Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original papers, in Italian or in English, on topics concerning aetiopathogenesis, prevention, epidemiology, diagnosis, clinical features and therapy of infections, whose acceptance is subject to the referee’s assessment. The Journal is of interest not only to infectious disease specialists, microbiologists and pharmacologists, but also to internal medicine specialists, paediatricians, pneumologists, and to surgeons as well. The Editorial Board includes experts in each of the above mentioned fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信