Comparison of clinical characteristics and outcome in RT-PCR positive and false-negative RT-PCR for COVID-19: A Retrospective analysis.

Q2 Medicine
Infezioni in Medicina Pub Date : 2022-09-01 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.53854/liim-3003-8
Durga Shankar Meena, Bharat Kumar, Arjun Kachhwaha, Deepak Kumar, Satyendra Khichar, Gopal Krishana Bohra, Ankur Sharma, Nikhil Kothari, Pawan Garg, Binit Sureka, Mithu Banerjee, Mahendra Kumar Garg, Sanjeev Misra
{"title":"Comparison of clinical characteristics and outcome in RT-PCR positive and false-negative RT-PCR for COVID-19: A Retrospective analysis.","authors":"Durga Shankar Meena,&nbsp;Bharat Kumar,&nbsp;Arjun Kachhwaha,&nbsp;Deepak Kumar,&nbsp;Satyendra Khichar,&nbsp;Gopal Krishana Bohra,&nbsp;Ankur Sharma,&nbsp;Nikhil Kothari,&nbsp;Pawan Garg,&nbsp;Binit Sureka,&nbsp;Mithu Banerjee,&nbsp;Mahendra Kumar Garg,&nbsp;Sanjeev Misra","doi":"10.53854/liim-3003-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cases with SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR negative pneumonia are an understudied group with uncertainty remaining regarding their treatment approach. We aimed to compare the clinical and radiological characteristics of RT-PCR positive and clinically diagnosed RT-PCR negative COVID-19. This was a single-centre retrospective study conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Western India. All patients (age ≥18 years) with suspicion of COVID-19 with SARI (severe acute respiratory infections) who were subjected to RT-PCR testing (nasal/oropharyngeal swab) were included. Based on RTPCR results, patients were categorized and compared for demographic, clinical, and biochemical characteristics and outcomes. Out of 500 patients, 339 (67.8%) found RT-PCR positive. Except for the radiological findings, both groups differ in clinical presentation, disease severity (inflammatory markers), and outcome. RT-PCR-positive patients had raised ferritin, NLR (Neutrophil-Lymphocyte ratio), LDH, and high mortality compared to the swab-negative group. In-hospital mortality was also significantly high in RT-PCR positive group (HR=1.9, 95% CI=1.4-2.5, p=0.001). On multivariate analysis, NLR, ferritin, and d-dimer were the independent predictors of mortality in RT-PCR-positive (p=0.038, 0.054, and 0.023). At the same time, raised TLC (total leukocyte count) and procalcitonin were the risk factors for poor outcomes in RT-PCR-negative patients (p=0.041 and 0.038). We found significantly raised ferritin, NLR, and LDH levels and increased mortality in RT-PCR positive patients compared to RT-PCR negative. Incorporating clinical features, radiological, and biochemical parameters could be prudent while managing the RT-PCR-negative patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":52423,"journal":{"name":"Infezioni in Medicina","volume":"30 3","pages":"403-411"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448311/pdf/1124-9390_30_3_2022_403-411.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infezioni in Medicina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53854/liim-3003-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Cases with SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR negative pneumonia are an understudied group with uncertainty remaining regarding their treatment approach. We aimed to compare the clinical and radiological characteristics of RT-PCR positive and clinically diagnosed RT-PCR negative COVID-19. This was a single-centre retrospective study conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Western India. All patients (age ≥18 years) with suspicion of COVID-19 with SARI (severe acute respiratory infections) who were subjected to RT-PCR testing (nasal/oropharyngeal swab) were included. Based on RTPCR results, patients were categorized and compared for demographic, clinical, and biochemical characteristics and outcomes. Out of 500 patients, 339 (67.8%) found RT-PCR positive. Except for the radiological findings, both groups differ in clinical presentation, disease severity (inflammatory markers), and outcome. RT-PCR-positive patients had raised ferritin, NLR (Neutrophil-Lymphocyte ratio), LDH, and high mortality compared to the swab-negative group. In-hospital mortality was also significantly high in RT-PCR positive group (HR=1.9, 95% CI=1.4-2.5, p=0.001). On multivariate analysis, NLR, ferritin, and d-dimer were the independent predictors of mortality in RT-PCR-positive (p=0.038, 0.054, and 0.023). At the same time, raised TLC (total leukocyte count) and procalcitonin were the risk factors for poor outcomes in RT-PCR-negative patients (p=0.041 and 0.038). We found significantly raised ferritin, NLR, and LDH levels and increased mortality in RT-PCR positive patients compared to RT-PCR negative. Incorporating clinical features, radiological, and biochemical parameters could be prudent while managing the RT-PCR-negative patients.

2019冠状病毒病RT-PCR阳性与假阴性临床特征及转归的回顾性分析
SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR阴性肺炎病例是一个未充分研究的群体,其治疗方法仍不确定。我们的目的是比较RT-PCR阳性和临床诊断的RT-PCR阴性COVID-19的临床和放射学特征。这是一项在印度西部一家三级医院进行的单中心回顾性研究。所有疑似COVID-19合并严重急性呼吸道感染(SARI)的患者(年龄≥18岁)均接受了RT-PCR检测(鼻/口咽拭子)。根据RTPCR结果,对患者进行分类并比较人口学、临床和生化特征和结果。在500名患者中,有339名(67.8%)呈RT-PCR阳性。除了影像学表现外,两组在临床表现、疾病严重程度(炎症标志物)和预后方面存在差异。与拭子阴性组相比,rt - pcr阳性患者铁蛋白、NLR(中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率)、LDH升高,死亡率高。RT-PCR阳性组住院死亡率也显著高(HR=1.9, 95% CI=1.4 ~ 2.5, p=0.001)。在多变量分析中,NLR、铁蛋白和d-二聚体是rt - pcr阳性患者死亡率的独立预测因子(p=0.038、0.054和0.023)。同时,TLC升高(白细胞总数)和降钙素原升高是rt - pcr阴性患者预后不良的危险因素(p=0.041和0.038)。我们发现,与RT-PCR阴性患者相比,RT-PCR阳性患者的铁蛋白、NLR和LDH水平显著升高,死亡率增加。在处理rt - pcr阴性患者时,结合临床特征、放射学和生化参数可能是谨慎的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infezioni in Medicina
Infezioni in Medicina Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original papers, in Italian or in English, on topics concerning aetiopathogenesis, prevention, epidemiology, diagnosis, clinical features and therapy of infections, whose acceptance is subject to the referee’s assessment. The Journal is of interest not only to infectious disease specialists, microbiologists and pharmacologists, but also to internal medicine specialists, paediatricians, pneumologists, and to surgeons as well. The Editorial Board includes experts in each of the above mentioned fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信