Alternative use of endocavitary probe to guide minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: is it reasonable?

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Acta cirurgica brasileira Pub Date : 2022-09-19 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/acb370607
Lucas Teixeira Batista, José Guilherme Reis de Oliveira, Vitor Parente Gouvea, Leonardo Azevedo de Souza, Rafael Tourinho-Barbosa
{"title":"Alternative use of endocavitary probe to guide minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: is it reasonable?","authors":"Lucas Teixeira Batista,&nbsp;José Guilherme Reis de Oliveira,&nbsp;Vitor Parente Gouvea,&nbsp;Leonardo Azevedo de Souza,&nbsp;Rafael Tourinho-Barbosa","doi":"10.1590/acb370607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the use of endocavitary ultrasound probe as an auxiliary tool when performing partial nephrectomy in cases of endophytic renal tumors, to standardize the method, and to report the preliminary results achieved with this technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen patients diagnosed with completely endophytic underwent partial nephrectomy with the use of an endocavitary ultrasound probe. This article describes the technique involved in partial nephrectomy and details the preparation of the endocavitary ultrasound probe to ensure its safe use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the patients had a RENAL score between 8 and 11. The median time of warm ischemia was 26 and 18 minutes for laparoscopic or robot-assisted surgery, respectively. The median duration of surgery was 150 minutes, and the median console time was 145 minutes for the laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery groups, respectively. The median estimate of blood loss was 200 mL. Only three patients in the laparoscopic group had focal positive surgical margins. There were no cases of infection at the site of probe entry.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intraoperative use of an endocavitary ultrasound probe for partial nephrectomy is possible and a safe alternative to the excision of endophytic tumors when neither robotic probes nor laparoscopic probes are available.</p>","PeriodicalId":6992,"journal":{"name":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","volume":"37 6","pages":"e370607"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9488510/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta cirurgica brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/acb370607","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the use of endocavitary ultrasound probe as an auxiliary tool when performing partial nephrectomy in cases of endophytic renal tumors, to standardize the method, and to report the preliminary results achieved with this technique.

Methods: Fifteen patients diagnosed with completely endophytic underwent partial nephrectomy with the use of an endocavitary ultrasound probe. This article describes the technique involved in partial nephrectomy and details the preparation of the endocavitary ultrasound probe to ensure its safe use.

Results: All the patients had a RENAL score between 8 and 11. The median time of warm ischemia was 26 and 18 minutes for laparoscopic or robot-assisted surgery, respectively. The median duration of surgery was 150 minutes, and the median console time was 145 minutes for the laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgery groups, respectively. The median estimate of blood loss was 200 mL. Only three patients in the laparoscopic group had focal positive surgical margins. There were no cases of infection at the site of probe entry.

Conclusions: Intraoperative use of an endocavitary ultrasound probe for partial nephrectomy is possible and a safe alternative to the excision of endophytic tumors when neither robotic probes nor laparoscopic probes are available.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

替代使用腔内探针指导微创肾部分切除术:是否合理?
目的:介绍在肾内生肿瘤部分切除术中使用腔内超声探头作为辅助工具的情况,规范其方法,并报告该技术的初步结果。方法:15例确诊为完全内生肾病的患者行部分肾切除术,采用腔内超声探头。本文介绍了部分肾切除术所涉及的技术,并详细介绍了腔内超声探头的制备,以确保其安全使用。结果:所有患者的肾功能评分均在8 ~ 11分之间。腹腔镜或机器人辅助手术的中位热缺血时间分别为26分钟和18分钟。腹腔镜组和机器人辅助手术组的中位手术时间分别为150分钟和145分钟。出血量的中位数估计为200毫升。腹腔镜组中只有3例患者有局灶性手术切缘阳性。探针入路部位无感染病例。结论:术中使用腔内超声探头进行部分肾切除术是可行的,在没有机器人探头和腹腔镜探头的情况下,是一种安全的替代内生肿瘤切除术的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
60
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信