A tool to evaluate physiotherapy clinical education in South Africa.

IF 1 Q4 REHABILITATION
South African Journal of Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2022-08-31 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1759
Vaneshveri Naidoo, Aimée V Stewart, Morake E D Maleka
{"title":"A tool to evaluate physiotherapy clinical education in South Africa.","authors":"Vaneshveri Naidoo, Aimée V Stewart, Morake E D Maleka","doi":"10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physiotherapy clinical education is complex. The dynamic learning milieu is fluid and multidimensional, which contributes to the complexity of the clinical learning experience. Consequently, there are numerous factors which impact the clinical learning experience which cannot be measured objectively - a gap which led to the development of our study.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop, validate, and test the reliability of an assessment tool that evaluates the effectiveness and quality of physiotherapy clinical education programmes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A mixed methods approach in three phases included physiotherapy academics, clinical educators, and clinicians throughout South Africa. Phase One was a qualitative study: focus group discussions determined items and domains of the tool. Phase Two established the content and construct validity of the tool, a scoring system and a name for the tool, using the Delphi method. In Phase Three, factor analysis reduced the number of items, and the feasibility and utility of the tool was determined cross-sectionally.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Vaneshveri Naidoo Clinical Programme Evaluation Tool (VN-CPET) of 58 items and six domains was developed and found to be valid, reliable (α = 0.75) and useful. The six domains of VN-CPET include governance; academic processes; learning exposure; clinical orientation; clinical supervision and quality assurance and monitoring and evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Vaneshveri Naidoo Clinical Programme Evaluation Tool is a valid, reliable and standardised tool, that evaluates the quality and effectiveness of physiotherapy clinical education programmes.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>This tool can objectively evaluate the quality and effectiveness of physiotherapy clinical education programmes in South Africa, and other health science education programmes, both locally and globally, with minor modification.</p>","PeriodicalId":44180,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9453145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physiotherapy clinical education is complex. The dynamic learning milieu is fluid and multidimensional, which contributes to the complexity of the clinical learning experience. Consequently, there are numerous factors which impact the clinical learning experience which cannot be measured objectively - a gap which led to the development of our study.

Objectives: To develop, validate, and test the reliability of an assessment tool that evaluates the effectiveness and quality of physiotherapy clinical education programmes.

Method: A mixed methods approach in three phases included physiotherapy academics, clinical educators, and clinicians throughout South Africa. Phase One was a qualitative study: focus group discussions determined items and domains of the tool. Phase Two established the content and construct validity of the tool, a scoring system and a name for the tool, using the Delphi method. In Phase Three, factor analysis reduced the number of items, and the feasibility and utility of the tool was determined cross-sectionally.

Results: The Vaneshveri Naidoo Clinical Programme Evaluation Tool (VN-CPET) of 58 items and six domains was developed and found to be valid, reliable (α = 0.75) and useful. The six domains of VN-CPET include governance; academic processes; learning exposure; clinical orientation; clinical supervision and quality assurance and monitoring and evaluation.

Conclusion: The Vaneshveri Naidoo Clinical Programme Evaluation Tool is a valid, reliable and standardised tool, that evaluates the quality and effectiveness of physiotherapy clinical education programmes.

Clinical implications: This tool can objectively evaluate the quality and effectiveness of physiotherapy clinical education programmes in South Africa, and other health science education programmes, both locally and globally, with minor modification.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

南非理疗临床教育评估工具。
背景:物理治疗临床教育十分复杂。动态的学习环境是多变的、多维的,这导致了临床学习体验的复杂性。因此,有许多影响临床学习体验的因素无法客观测量,而这正是我们开展研究的初衷:开发、验证和测试评估工具的可靠性,以评估物理治疗临床教育课程的有效性和质量:方法:采用混合方法,分三个阶段进行,包括南非各地的物理治疗学者、临床教育工作者和临床医生。第一阶段为定性研究:焦点小组讨论确定工具的项目和领域。第二阶段采用德尔菲法确定了工具的内容和结构有效性、评分系统和工具名称。在第三阶段,通过因素分析减少了项目数量,并横向确定了工具的可行性和实用性:结果:Vaneshveri Naidoo 临床项目评估工具(VN-CPET)由 58 个项目和六个领域组成,其有效性、可靠性(α = 0.75)和实用性得到了证实。VN-CPET 的六个领域包括管理、学术过程、学习接触、临床导向、临床监督和质量保证以及监测和评估:Vaneshveri Naidoo 临床项目评估工具是一种有效、可靠和标准化的工具,可用于评估物理治疗临床教育项目的质量和有效性:该工具只需稍加修改,就能客观地评估南非物理治疗临床教育课程以及本地和全球其他健康科学教育课程的质量和效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信