Medial Plica Syndrome of the Knee: Arthroscopic Plica Resection versus Structured Physiotherapy-A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY
Surgery Journal Pub Date : 2022-09-19 eCollection Date: 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1756183
Steffen Sauer, Gitte Karlsen, Lene Miller, Jens Ole Storm
{"title":"Medial Plica Syndrome of the Knee: Arthroscopic Plica Resection versus Structured Physiotherapy-A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Steffen Sauer,&nbsp;Gitte Karlsen,&nbsp;Lene Miller,&nbsp;Jens Ole Storm","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1756183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Medial plica syndrome is a commonly overlooked cause of anterior knee pain. A consensus on diagnosis and treatment is yet to be found. This study compares the clinical outcome of arthroscopic plica resection with structured physiotherapy for patients with isolated medial plica syndrome in a prospective randomized controlled trial with a 2-year follow-up. <b>Methods</b>  Forty-eight patients have been included in this prospective randomized controlled trial presenting medial plica syndrome. Patients were randomly assigned to either arthroscopic plica resection or structured physiotherapy. The primary outcome was the change in the average score of the Lysholm knee scoring scale from baseline to 2-year follow-up. <b>Results</b> Mean baseline Lysholm score for patients assigned to arthroscopic plica resection and physiotherapy was 65.8 and 66.3, respectively. No significant difference was seen between the two groups. Thirty-three patients were assessed at 2 years follow up. The mean Lysholm score was 89.7 for patients assigned to arthroscopic plica resection and 74.6 for patients assigned to structured physiotherapy. A statistically significant difference was seen between the two groups (p = 0.007). <b>Conclusions</b>  Arthroscopic plica resection was associated with significantly greater clinical improvement compared with physiotherapy at 2-year follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":44614,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9484868/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1756183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background  Medial plica syndrome is a commonly overlooked cause of anterior knee pain. A consensus on diagnosis and treatment is yet to be found. This study compares the clinical outcome of arthroscopic plica resection with structured physiotherapy for patients with isolated medial plica syndrome in a prospective randomized controlled trial with a 2-year follow-up. Methods  Forty-eight patients have been included in this prospective randomized controlled trial presenting medial plica syndrome. Patients were randomly assigned to either arthroscopic plica resection or structured physiotherapy. The primary outcome was the change in the average score of the Lysholm knee scoring scale from baseline to 2-year follow-up. Results Mean baseline Lysholm score for patients assigned to arthroscopic plica resection and physiotherapy was 65.8 and 66.3, respectively. No significant difference was seen between the two groups. Thirty-three patients were assessed at 2 years follow up. The mean Lysholm score was 89.7 for patients assigned to arthroscopic plica resection and 74.6 for patients assigned to structured physiotherapy. A statistically significant difference was seen between the two groups (p = 0.007). Conclusions  Arthroscopic plica resection was associated with significantly greater clinical improvement compared with physiotherapy at 2-year follow-up.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

膝关节内侧皱襞综合征:关节镜下皱襞切除术与结构化物理治疗-一项随机对照试验。
背景:内侧皱襞综合征是一种常被忽视的引起膝关节前部疼痛的原因。目前尚未就诊断和治疗达成共识。本研究在一项为期2年的前瞻性随机对照试验中比较了关节镜下皱襞切除术与结构化物理治疗对孤立性内侧皱襞综合征患者的临床结果。方法48例出现内侧皱襞综合征的患者纳入前瞻性随机对照试验。患者被随机分配到关节镜下皱襞切除术或有组织的物理治疗。主要结局是Lysholm膝关节评分量表从基线到2年随访期间平均得分的变化。结果关节镜下手术和物理治疗的患者Lysholm平均基线评分分别为65.8分和66.3分。两组间无显著差异。33例患者随访2年。关节镜下手术的Lysholm评分为89.7分,结构化物理治疗的Lysholm评分为74.6分。两组间差异有统计学意义(p = 0.007)。结论在2年的随访中,关节镜下皱襞切除术与物理治疗相比有更大的临床改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgery Journal
Surgery Journal SURGERY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信