Validation of the COVID-19 IgG/IgM Rapid Test Cassette (BNCP - 402 and BNCP402) in a South African setting.

IF 1.4 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2022-08-31 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajid.v37i1.431
Gilad Mensky, Tristan Pillay, Alexander von Klemperer, Merika J Tsitsi, Michelle Venter, Colin N Menezes, Sarah A van Blydenstein
{"title":"Validation of the COVID-19 IgG/IgM Rapid Test Cassette (BNCP - 402 and BNCP402) in a South African setting.","authors":"Gilad Mensky,&nbsp;Tristan Pillay,&nbsp;Alexander von Klemperer,&nbsp;Merika J Tsitsi,&nbsp;Michelle Venter,&nbsp;Colin N Menezes,&nbsp;Sarah A van Blydenstein","doi":"10.4102/sajid.v37i1.431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Different diagnostic tools could improve early detection of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A number of antibody-based serological point-of-care tests have been developed to supplement real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based diagnosis. This study describes the validity of an antibody test, namely the immunoglobulin G (IgG)/immunoglobulin M (IgM) Rapid Test Cassette<sup>®</sup> (BNCP - 402 and BNCP402), manufactured by Spring Healthcare Services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort validation study was undertaken at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital between 16 July 2020 and 12 August 2020. A total of 101 patients admitted as COVID-19 cases under investigation were included in the study. They were divided into two categories depending on time since symptom onset: testing performed within seven days (early cohort) and after seven days (late cohort). The rapid antibody test was compared to the RT-PCR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the test has a sensitivity and specificity of 85.2% and 80.0%, respectively, for a combination of IgG and IgM. Sensitivity and specificity of IgG testing alone were 81.5% and 85%. Sensitivity improved for testing with increasing time from symptom onset; however, specifity was not significantly different.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study data adds to the body of evidence that because of relatively low sensitivity and specificity, there is a limited role for antibody-based point-of-care testing in the acute phase of COVID-19 infection, as was the case with this IgG/IgM Rapid Test Cassette (BNCP - 402 and BNCP402). There may exist a role for such testing in patients recovered from prior COVID-19 infection or in seroprevalence studies; however, additional evaluations at later timepoints from symptom onset are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":44007,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"431"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9452929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajid.v37i1.431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Different diagnostic tools could improve early detection of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A number of antibody-based serological point-of-care tests have been developed to supplement real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based diagnosis. This study describes the validity of an antibody test, namely the immunoglobulin G (IgG)/immunoglobulin M (IgM) Rapid Test Cassette® (BNCP - 402 and BNCP402), manufactured by Spring Healthcare Services.

Methods: A prospective cohort validation study was undertaken at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital between 16 July 2020 and 12 August 2020. A total of 101 patients admitted as COVID-19 cases under investigation were included in the study. They were divided into two categories depending on time since symptom onset: testing performed within seven days (early cohort) and after seven days (late cohort). The rapid antibody test was compared to the RT-PCR.

Results: Overall, the test has a sensitivity and specificity of 85.2% and 80.0%, respectively, for a combination of IgG and IgM. Sensitivity and specificity of IgG testing alone were 81.5% and 85%. Sensitivity improved for testing with increasing time from symptom onset; however, specifity was not significantly different.

Conclusion: The study data adds to the body of evidence that because of relatively low sensitivity and specificity, there is a limited role for antibody-based point-of-care testing in the acute phase of COVID-19 infection, as was the case with this IgG/IgM Rapid Test Cassette (BNCP - 402 and BNCP402). There may exist a role for such testing in patients recovered from prior COVID-19 infection or in seroprevalence studies; however, additional evaluations at later timepoints from symptom onset are required.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

COVID-19 IgG/IgM快速检测盒(BNCP - 402和BNCP402)在南非的验证
背景:不同的诊断工具可以提高2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的早期发现。已经开发了一些基于抗体的血清学即时检测,以补充基于实时逆转录酶聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)的诊断。本研究描述了一种抗体检测的有效性,即由Spring Healthcare Services生产的免疫球蛋白G (IgG)/免疫球蛋白M (IgM)快速检测盒®(BNCP - 402和BNCP402)。方法:2020年7月16日至2020年8月12日在Chris Hani Baragwanath学术医院进行了一项前瞻性队列验证研究。本次研究共纳入101例新冠肺炎入院调查患者。他们根据症状出现的时间分为两类:7天内(早期队列)和7天后(晚期队列)进行的测试。将快速抗体试验与RT-PCR进行比较。结果:总体而言,该检测对IgG和IgM的敏感性和特异性分别为85.2%和80.0%。单独检测IgG的敏感性和特异性分别为81.5%和85%。随着症状出现时间的延长,检测灵敏度提高;但特异性无显著性差异。结论:该研究数据进一步证明,由于相对较低的敏感性和特异性,基于抗体的即时检测在COVID-19感染急性期的作用有限,就像这种IgG/IgM快速检测盒(BNCP - 402和BNCP402)的情况一样。这种检测可能在先前感染COVID-19的康复患者或血清阳性率研究中发挥作用;然而,需要在症状出现后的较晚时间点进行额外的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
11.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信