A simulation study for geographic cluster detection analysis on population-based health survey data using spatial scan statistics.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jisu Moon, Inkyung Jung
{"title":"A simulation study for geographic cluster detection analysis on population-based health survey data using spatial scan statistics.","authors":"Jisu Moon,&nbsp;Inkyung Jung","doi":"10.1186/s12942-022-00311-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In public health and epidemiology, spatial scan statistics can be used to identify spatial cluster patterns of health-related outcomes from population-based health survey data. Although it is appropriate to consider the complex sample design and sampling weight when analyzing complex sample survey data, the observed survey responses without these considerations are often used in many studies related to spatial cluster detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a simulation study to investigate which data type from complex survey data is more suitable for use by comparing the spatial cluster detection results of three approaches: (1) individual-level data, (2) weighted individual-level data, and (3) aggregated data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the spatial cluster detection varied depending on the data type. To compare the performance of spatial cluster detection, sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) were evaluated over 100 iterations. The average sensitivity was high for all three approaches, but the average PPV was higher when using aggregated data than when using individual-level data with or without sampling weights.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Through the simulation study, we found that use of aggregate-level data is more appropriate than other types of data, when searching for spatial clusters using spatial scan statistics on population-based health survey data.</p>","PeriodicalId":48739,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Geographics","volume":" ","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9463844/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Geographics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-022-00311-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In public health and epidemiology, spatial scan statistics can be used to identify spatial cluster patterns of health-related outcomes from population-based health survey data. Although it is appropriate to consider the complex sample design and sampling weight when analyzing complex sample survey data, the observed survey responses without these considerations are often used in many studies related to spatial cluster detection.

Methods: We conducted a simulation study to investigate which data type from complex survey data is more suitable for use by comparing the spatial cluster detection results of three approaches: (1) individual-level data, (2) weighted individual-level data, and (3) aggregated data.

Results: The results of the spatial cluster detection varied depending on the data type. To compare the performance of spatial cluster detection, sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) were evaluated over 100 iterations. The average sensitivity was high for all three approaches, but the average PPV was higher when using aggregated data than when using individual-level data with or without sampling weights.

Conclusions: Through the simulation study, we found that use of aggregate-level data is more appropriate than other types of data, when searching for spatial clusters using spatial scan statistics on population-based health survey data.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于空间扫描统计的人口健康调查数据地理聚类检测模拟研究。
背景:在公共卫生和流行病学中,空间扫描统计可用于从基于人群的健康调查数据中识别健康相关结果的空间聚类模式。虽然在分析复杂样本调查数据时考虑复杂的样本设计和抽样权重是合适的,但在许多与空间聚类检测相关的研究中,经常使用不考虑这些因素的观察到的调查响应。方法:通过比较(1)个人层面数据、(2)加权个人层面数据和(3)聚合数据三种方法的空间聚类检测结果,对复杂调查数据中哪种数据类型更适合使用进行模拟研究。结果:空间聚类检测的结果随数据类型的不同而不同。为了比较空间聚类检测的性能,在100次迭代中对灵敏度和阳性预测值(PPV)进行了评估。所有三种方法的平均灵敏度都很高,但使用汇总数据时的平均PPV高于使用有或没有抽样权的个人水平数据时的平均PPV。结论:通过模拟研究,我们发现在使用基于人群的健康调查数据的空间扫描统计来搜索空间集群时,使用聚合级数据比使用其他类型的数据更合适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Health Geographics
International Journal of Health Geographics PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: A leader among the field, International Journal of Health Geographics is an interdisciplinary, open access journal publishing internationally significant studies of geospatial information systems and science applications in health and healthcare. With an exceptional author satisfaction rate and a quick time to first decision, the journal caters to readers across an array of healthcare disciplines globally. International Journal of Health Geographics welcomes novel studies in the health and healthcare context spanning from spatial data infrastructure and Web geospatial interoperability research, to research into real-time Geographic Information Systems (GIS)-enabled surveillance services, remote sensing applications, spatial epidemiology, spatio-temporal statistics, internet GIS and cyberspace mapping, participatory GIS and citizen sensing, geospatial big data, healthy smart cities and regions, and geospatial Internet of Things and blockchain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信