Clone detection for business process models.

PeerJ Computer Science Pub Date : 2022-08-23 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.7717/peerj-cs.1046
Mahdi Saeedi Nikoo, Önder Babur, Mark van den Brand
{"title":"Clone detection for business process models.","authors":"Mahdi Saeedi Nikoo,&nbsp;Önder Babur,&nbsp;Mark van den Brand","doi":"10.7717/peerj-cs.1046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Models are key in software engineering, especially with the rise of model-driven software engineering. One such use of modeling is in business process modeling, where models are used to represent processes in enterprises. As the number of these process models grow in repositories, it leads to an increasing management and maintenance cost. Clone detection is a means that may provide various benefits such as repository management, data prepossessing, filtering, refactoring, and process family detection. In model clone detection, highly similar model fragments are mined from larger model repositories. In this study, we have extended SAMOS (Statistical Analysis of Models) framework for clone detection of business process models. The framework has been developed to support different types of analytics on models, including clone detection. We present the underlying techniques utilized in the framework, as well as our approach in extending the framework. We perform three experimental evaluations to demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. We first compare our tool against the Apromore toolset for a pairwise model similarity using a synthetic model mutation dataset. As indicated by the results, SAMOS seems to outperform Apromore in the coverage of the metrics in pairwise similarity of models. Later, we do a comparative analysis of the tools on model clone detection using a dataset derived from the SAP Reference Model Collection. In this case, the results show a better precision for Apromore, while a higher recall measure for SAMOS. Finally, we show the additional capabilities of our approach for different model scoping styles through another set of experimental evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":503620,"journal":{"name":"PeerJ Computer Science","volume":" ","pages":"e1046"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9454782/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PeerJ Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Models are key in software engineering, especially with the rise of model-driven software engineering. One such use of modeling is in business process modeling, where models are used to represent processes in enterprises. As the number of these process models grow in repositories, it leads to an increasing management and maintenance cost. Clone detection is a means that may provide various benefits such as repository management, data prepossessing, filtering, refactoring, and process family detection. In model clone detection, highly similar model fragments are mined from larger model repositories. In this study, we have extended SAMOS (Statistical Analysis of Models) framework for clone detection of business process models. The framework has been developed to support different types of analytics on models, including clone detection. We present the underlying techniques utilized in the framework, as well as our approach in extending the framework. We perform three experimental evaluations to demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. We first compare our tool against the Apromore toolset for a pairwise model similarity using a synthetic model mutation dataset. As indicated by the results, SAMOS seems to outperform Apromore in the coverage of the metrics in pairwise similarity of models. Later, we do a comparative analysis of the tools on model clone detection using a dataset derived from the SAP Reference Model Collection. In this case, the results show a better precision for Apromore, while a higher recall measure for SAMOS. Finally, we show the additional capabilities of our approach for different model scoping styles through another set of experimental evaluations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

业务流程模型的克隆检测。
模型是软件工程的关键,尤其是随着模型驱动软件工程的兴起。建模的一种这样的用法是在业务流程建模中,其中模型用于表示企业中的流程。随着存储库中这些流程模型数量的增长,它会导致管理和维护成本的增加。克隆检测是一种可以提供各种好处的方法,例如存储库管理、数据预处理、过滤、重构和过程族检测。在模型克隆检测中,从较大的模型库中挖掘高度相似的模型片段。在本研究中,我们扩展了SAMOS(模型统计分析)框架,用于业务流程模型的克隆检测。开发该框架是为了支持不同类型的模型分析,包括克隆检测。我们介绍了框架中使用的底层技术,以及扩展框架的方法。我们进行了三个实验评估,以证明我们的方法的有效性。我们首先使用合成模型突变数据集将我们的工具与Apromore工具集进行两两模型相似性的比较。正如结果所表明的那样,SAMOS在模型的两两相似性度量的覆盖范围方面似乎优于appromore。随后,我们使用来自SAP参考模型集合的数据集对模型克隆检测工具进行了比较分析。在这种情况下,结果表明Apromore具有更好的精度,而SAMOS具有更高的召回率。最后,通过另一组实验评估,我们展示了针对不同模型范围界定风格的方法的附加功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书