[Prevalence of maternal intrapartum colonization due to the Group-B Streptococus: epidemiological analysis in the province of Jaén (Spain).]

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Revista Espanola De Salud Publica Pub Date : 2022-09-07
Jesús Joaquín Hijona Elósegui, Antonio Luis Carballo García, Ana Cristina Fernández Rísquez, Martín Bermúdez Quintana, Juan Francisco Expósito Montes
{"title":"[Prevalence of maternal intrapartum colonization due to the Group-B Streptococus: epidemiological analysis in the province of Jaén (Spain).]","authors":"Jesús Joaquín Hijona Elósegui,&nbsp;Antonio Luis Carballo García,&nbsp;Ana Cristina Fernández Rísquez,&nbsp;Martín Bermúdez Quintana,&nbsp;Juan Francisco Expósito Montes","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Group B Streptococcus (GBS) infection remains to datey, without peripartum prophylaxis, the most common cause of vertically transmitted perinatal bacterial infection in the Western world. It is estimated that the prevalence of asymptomatic pregnant women with GBS in our country ranges between 10 and 20.5%, but there are few studies in this regard. With this research, we tried to establish the rate of pregnant women colonized by GBS at the recto-vaginal level at the time of delivery and to evaluate the validity of our strategy for the identification of pregnant women with GBS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 290 women sample representative of pregnant population from the province of Jaén was randomly selected and the presence or absence of GBS in the recto-vaginal microbiota was determined on the day of delivery. Subsequently, a retrospective analysis was made, case by case, in order to establish whether the screening techniques applied during pregnancy had been able to correctly identify the state of GBS colonization at the time of delivery. Statistical techniques were applied to perform a descriptive sample analysis, which was complemented with a case-by-case concordance analysis for the two GBS determinations made over time for each subject (repeated observations over time on individuals from the same cohort).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of pregnant women carrying GBS at the recto-vaginal level at the time of delivery was 23.10.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our province, the rate of pregnant women with GBS at the time of delivery is higher than previously reported in the literature. Furthermore, our screening strategy during pregnancy could misclassify one of each eight women, causing one in sixteen GBS carriers to not be adequately identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":47152,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola De Salud Publica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola De Salud Publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Group B Streptococcus (GBS) infection remains to datey, without peripartum prophylaxis, the most common cause of vertically transmitted perinatal bacterial infection in the Western world. It is estimated that the prevalence of asymptomatic pregnant women with GBS in our country ranges between 10 and 20.5%, but there are few studies in this regard. With this research, we tried to establish the rate of pregnant women colonized by GBS at the recto-vaginal level at the time of delivery and to evaluate the validity of our strategy for the identification of pregnant women with GBS.

Methods: A 290 women sample representative of pregnant population from the province of Jaén was randomly selected and the presence or absence of GBS in the recto-vaginal microbiota was determined on the day of delivery. Subsequently, a retrospective analysis was made, case by case, in order to establish whether the screening techniques applied during pregnancy had been able to correctly identify the state of GBS colonization at the time of delivery. Statistical techniques were applied to perform a descriptive sample analysis, which was complemented with a case-by-case concordance analysis for the two GBS determinations made over time for each subject (repeated observations over time on individuals from the same cohort).

Results: The rate of pregnant women carrying GBS at the recto-vaginal level at the time of delivery was 23.10.

Conclusions: In our province, the rate of pregnant women with GBS at the time of delivery is higher than previously reported in the literature. Furthermore, our screening strategy during pregnancy could misclassify one of each eight women, causing one in sixteen GBS carriers to not be adequately identified.

[产妇产时b群链球菌定植的流行病学分析:西班牙贾文森省]
目的:B族链球菌(GBS)感染至今仍是西方国家最常见的垂直传播的围产期细菌感染,没有围产期预防措施。据估计,我国无症状妊娠妇女GBS患病率在10% ~ 20.5%之间,但这方面的研究很少。通过这项研究,我们试图确定孕妇在分娩时直肠-阴道水平的GBS定植率,并评估我们识别GBS孕妇策略的有效性。方法:随机选取有代表性的290名孕妇样本,在分娩当天检测直肠-阴道菌群中是否存在GBS。随后,逐一进行回顾性分析,以确定怀孕期间使用的筛查技术是否能够正确识别分娩时的GBS定植状态。应用统计技术进行描述性样本分析,并对每个受试者随时间进行的两次GBS测定进行逐案一致性分析(对来自同一队列的个体随时间重复观察)。结果:孕妇分娩时直肠-阴道水平GBS检出率为23.10%。结论:我省孕妇分娩时发生GBS的比例高于文献报道。此外,我们在怀孕期间的筛查策略可能会对每8名女性中的1名进行错误分类,导致每16名GBS携带者中有1名没有被充分识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Espanola De Salud Publica
Revista Espanola De Salud Publica PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信