Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Perioperative Administration of Acetazolamide for Management of Postoperative Pain after Laparoscopy.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Kaitlin McGrail, Andrew G Chapple, Gabrielle Stone, Elizabeth F Sutton, Neil R Chappell
{"title":"Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Perioperative Administration of Acetazolamide for Management of Postoperative Pain after Laparoscopy.","authors":"Kaitlin McGrail,&nbsp;Andrew G Chapple,&nbsp;Gabrielle Stone,&nbsp;Elizabeth F Sutton,&nbsp;Neil R Chappell","doi":"10.4293/JSLS.2022.00032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of perioperative acetazolamide (ACTZ) administration with laparoscopy for reducing postoperative referred pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The following databases were searched from inception to March 1, 2020: Cochrane, PubMed, PubMed Central, Ovid, and Embase. Electronic search used: Acetazolamide AND (laparoscopy OR laparoscopic OR Celioscopy OR Celioscopies OR Peritoneoscopy OR Peritoneoscopies). No limits or filters were used. We included only studies of patients who underwent abdominal laparoscopy (LSC), had a pain assessment at approximately 24 hours postoperatively, and included a treatment with ACTZ group and a no-treatment or minimal-treatment comparison group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies met inclusion criteria, with a combined total of 253 participants, 116 in the ACTZ group and 137 in the control group. A Bayesian hierarchical model was assumed for the study specific treatment effects. Posterior sampling was conducted via Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods, and posterior inference carried out on the hierarchical treatment effect. ACTZ significantly decreased average pain scores compared to control group by -0.726 points (95% confidence interval -1.175-0.264). The posterior probability that ACTZ decreases mean pain scores by ≥ 0.5 was 0.846.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current available evidence demonstrates that perioperative ACTZ may provide a modest improvement in postoperative referred pain following LSC.</p>","PeriodicalId":17679,"journal":{"name":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/14/e4/e2022.00032.PMC9385114.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and objective: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of perioperative acetazolamide (ACTZ) administration with laparoscopy for reducing postoperative referred pain.

Methods: The following databases were searched from inception to March 1, 2020: Cochrane, PubMed, PubMed Central, Ovid, and Embase. Electronic search used: Acetazolamide AND (laparoscopy OR laparoscopic OR Celioscopy OR Celioscopies OR Peritoneoscopy OR Peritoneoscopies). No limits or filters were used. We included only studies of patients who underwent abdominal laparoscopy (LSC), had a pain assessment at approximately 24 hours postoperatively, and included a treatment with ACTZ group and a no-treatment or minimal-treatment comparison group.

Results: Five studies met inclusion criteria, with a combined total of 253 participants, 116 in the ACTZ group and 137 in the control group. A Bayesian hierarchical model was assumed for the study specific treatment effects. Posterior sampling was conducted via Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods, and posterior inference carried out on the hierarchical treatment effect. ACTZ significantly decreased average pain scores compared to control group by -0.726 points (95% confidence interval -1.175-0.264). The posterior probability that ACTZ decreases mean pain scores by ≥ 0.5 was 0.846.

Conclusion: Current available evidence demonstrates that perioperative ACTZ may provide a modest improvement in postoperative referred pain following LSC.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

围手术期应用乙酰唑胺治疗腹腔镜术后疼痛的系统评价与meta分析。
背景与目的:通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,评价腹腔镜下围手术期给药乙酰唑胺(ACTZ)减轻术后牵涉性疼痛的疗效。方法:从建库到2020年3月1日检索以下数据库:Cochrane、PubMed、PubMed Central、Ovid和Embase。电子搜索使用:乙酰唑胺和(腹腔镜或腹腔镜或腹腔镜或腹腔镜或腹膜镜或腹膜镜)。没有使用限制或过滤器。我们只纳入了接受腹腔腹腔镜检查(LSC)、术后约24小时进行疼痛评估的患者的研究,并纳入了ACTZ治疗组和无治疗或最低治疗对照组。结果:5项研究符合纳入标准,总共253名参与者,ACTZ组116名,对照组137名。采用贝叶斯层次模型对研究的具体治疗效果进行了假设。通过马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗方法进行后验抽样,并对分层处理效果进行后验推理。与对照组相比,ACTZ显著降低了平均疼痛评分-0.726分(95%可信区间-1.175-0.264)。ACTZ使平均疼痛评分降低≥0.5的后验概率为0.846。结论:现有证据表明围手术期ACTZ可适度改善LSC术后牵涉性疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons publishes original scientific articles on basic science and technical topics in all the fields involved with laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive surgery. CRSLS, MIS Case Reports from SLS is dedicated to the publication of Case Reports in the field of minimally invasive surgery. The journals seek to advance our understandings and practice of minimally invasive, image-guided surgery by providing a forum for all relevant disciplines and by promoting the exchange of information and ideas across specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信