What Are the Wider Implications of Sparrow's Benefit Argument?

Abstract

Smolenski. 2015. Don’t edit the human germ line. Nature, 519 (7544):410–11. Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Ridgeway, S. 2002. I’m happy my child is deaf (interview by Merope Mills, April 9, 2002). The Guardian, April 9, 2002. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2002/apr/09/ genetics.theguardianwomenspages. Accessed 31 July 2022. Savulescu, J. 2001. Procreative beneficence: Why we should select the best children. Bioethics 15 (5–6):413–26. Savulescu, J. 2002. Deaf lesbians, “designer disability”, and the future of medicine. British Medical Journal 325 (7367):771–3. Savulescu, J., M. Hemsley, A. Newson, and B. Foddy. 2006. Behavioural genetics: Why eugenic selection is preferable to enhancement. Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (2): 157–71. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00336.x. Savulescu, J., and P. Singer. 2019. An ethical pathway for gene editing. Bioethics 33 (2):221–2. Savulescu, J., M. Labude, C. Barcellona, Z. Huang, M. K. Leverentz, V. Xafis, and T. Lysaght. 2022. Two kinds of embryo research: Four case examples. Journal of Medical Ethics. doi:10.1136/medethics-2021-108038. Sparrow, R. 2022. Human germline genome editing: On the nature of our reasons to genome edit. The American Journal of Bioethics 22 (9):4–15. doi: 10.1080/15265161. 2021.1907480.