Ammonia Inhalants Enhance Psychophysiological Responses and Performance During Repeated High Intensity Exercise.

IF 1.4 4区 教育学 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Rebecca R Rogers, Kalee G Beardsley, Peighton E Cumbie, Christopher G Ballmann
{"title":"Ammonia Inhalants Enhance Psychophysiological Responses and Performance During Repeated High Intensity Exercise.","authors":"Rebecca R Rogers, Kalee G Beardsley, Peighton E Cumbie, Christopher G Ballmann","doi":"10.1080/02701367.2022.2104447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Ammonia inhalants (NH<sub>3</sub>) are anecdotally used in competition by athletes for their purported stimulant effects. However, evidence on the efficacy of NH<sub>3</sub> is conflicting, and little to no studies to date have investigated its effect on repeated exercise. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of NH<sub>3</sub> on psychophysiological responses and performance during repeated high-intensity exercise. <b>Methods:</b> In a counterbalanced crossover design, physically active females completed two repeated high-intensity sprint trials with a different treatment: Control (CON; water) or Ammonia Inhalants (NH<sub>3</sub>; 0.33 cc). For each trial, participants completed 3 × 15s Wingate anaerobic tests (WAnT) separated by 2 min of active recovery. Prior to each WAnT, participants took a single 3-s inhale of the corresponding treatment. After the succession of each WAnT, heart rate (HR) and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) were documented. Subjective feelings of alertness and \"psyched up\" energy were measured using a visual analog scale. Trials were separated by at least 48 hr. <b>Results:</b> The results indicate that over the WAnTs, mean power (p = .017) and peak power (p = .006) were significantly higher with NH<sub>3</sub> compared to CON despite a lack of changes in fatigue index (p = .928). HR (p = .101) and RPE (p = .897) were not different with varying treatments. Perceived alertness (p = .010) and psyched-up energy (p = .002) were significantly higher with NH<sub>3</sub> versus CON. <b>Conclusion:</b> These findings provide empirical support for the use of NH<sub>3</sub> to improve repeated high-intensity exercise performance in females that may be underpinned by alterations in subjective alertness and energy.</p>","PeriodicalId":54491,"journal":{"name":"Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2022.2104447","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Ammonia inhalants (NH3) are anecdotally used in competition by athletes for their purported stimulant effects. However, evidence on the efficacy of NH3 is conflicting, and little to no studies to date have investigated its effect on repeated exercise. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of NH3 on psychophysiological responses and performance during repeated high-intensity exercise. Methods: In a counterbalanced crossover design, physically active females completed two repeated high-intensity sprint trials with a different treatment: Control (CON; water) or Ammonia Inhalants (NH3; 0.33 cc). For each trial, participants completed 3 × 15s Wingate anaerobic tests (WAnT) separated by 2 min of active recovery. Prior to each WAnT, participants took a single 3-s inhale of the corresponding treatment. After the succession of each WAnT, heart rate (HR) and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) were documented. Subjective feelings of alertness and "psyched up" energy were measured using a visual analog scale. Trials were separated by at least 48 hr. Results: The results indicate that over the WAnTs, mean power (p = .017) and peak power (p = .006) were significantly higher with NH3 compared to CON despite a lack of changes in fatigue index (p = .928). HR (p = .101) and RPE (p = .897) were not different with varying treatments. Perceived alertness (p = .010) and psyched-up energy (p = .002) were significantly higher with NH3 versus CON. Conclusion: These findings provide empirical support for the use of NH3 to improve repeated high-intensity exercise performance in females that may be underpinned by alterations in subjective alertness and energy.

氨吸入剂在重复高强度运动中增强心理生理反应和表现。
目的:氨吸入剂(NH3)在比赛中被运动员使用,因为他们声称有兴奋剂作用。然而,关于NH3功效的证据是相互矛盾的,迄今为止几乎没有研究调查过它对重复运动的影响。本研究的目的是研究NH3在重复高强度运动中对心理生理反应和表现的影响。方法:在平衡交叉设计中,体力活动的女性在不同的处理下完成两个重复的高强度冲刺试验:对照组(CON;水)或氨吸入剂(NH3;0.33 cc)。在每次试验中,参与者完成3 × 15s Wingate厌氧试验(WAnT),中间间隔2分钟主动恢复。在每次WAnT之前,参与者对相应的治疗进行3-s的单次吸入。在每个WAnT连续后,记录心率(HR)和感知运动率(RPE)。主观感觉的警觉性和“兴奋”的能量是用视觉模拟量表测量的。试验之间至少间隔48小时。结果:结果表明,尽管疲劳指数没有变化(p = 0.928),但与CON相比,NH3的平均功率(p = 0.017)和峰值功率(p = 0.006)明显高于CON。HR (p = .101)和RPE (p = .897)在不同处理间无显著差异。结论:这些发现为使用NH3改善女性重复高强度运动表现提供了经验支持,这可能是通过改变主观警觉性和能量来支持的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport publishes research in the art and science of human movement that contributes significantly to the knowledge base of the field as new information, reviews, substantiation or contradiction of previous findings, development of theory, or as application of new or improved techniques. The goals of RQES are to provide a scholarly outlet for knowledge that: (a) contributes to the study of human movement, particularly its cross-disciplinary and interdisciplinary nature; (b) impacts theory and practice regarding human movement; (c) stimulates research about human movement; and (d) provides theoretical reviews and tutorials related to the study of human movement. The editorial board, associate editors, and external reviewers assist the editor-in-chief. Qualified reviewers in the appropriate subdisciplines review manuscripts deemed suitable. Authors are usually advised of the decision on their papers within 75–90 days.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信