Political ideology and pandemic lifestyles: the indirect effects of empathy, authoritarianism, and threat.

Discover Social Science and Health Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-24 DOI:10.1007/s44155-022-00014-0
Terrence D Hill, Ginny Garcia-Alexander, Andrew P Davis, Eric T Bjorklund, Luis A Vila-Henninger, William C Cockerham
{"title":"Political ideology and pandemic lifestyles: the indirect effects of empathy, authoritarianism, and threat.","authors":"Terrence D Hill, Ginny Garcia-Alexander, Andrew P Davis, Eric T Bjorklund, Luis A Vila-Henninger, William C Cockerham","doi":"10.1007/s44155-022-00014-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this paper, we integrate theory and research from sociology, psychology, and political science to develop and test a mediation model that helps to explain <i>why</i> political conservatism is often associated with pandemic behaviors and lifestyles that are inconsistent with public health recommendations for COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using national data from the 2021 <i>Crime, Health, and Politics Survey</i> (n = 1743), we formally test the indirect effects of political conservatism (an index of Republican party identification, conservative political orientation, right-wing news media consumption, and 2020 Trump vote) on pandemic lifestyles (an index of social distancing, hand sanitizing, mask usage, and vaccination) through the mechanisms of empathy (concern about the welfare of others), authoritarian beliefs (authoritarian aggressiveness and acquiescence to authority), and pandemic threat perceptions (threats to self and to the broader society).</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Our results confirm that political conservatism is associated with riskier pandemic lifestyles. We also find that this association is partially mediated by lower levels of empathy, higher levels of authoritarian beliefs, and lower levels of perceived pandemic threat.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding <i>why</i> political conservatism is associated with riskier pandemic lifestyles may eventually lead us to ways of identifying and overcoming widespread cultural barriers to critical pandemic responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":29972,"journal":{"name":"Discover Social Science and Health","volume":" ","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9400002/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discover Social Science and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44155-022-00014-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In this paper, we integrate theory and research from sociology, psychology, and political science to develop and test a mediation model that helps to explain why political conservatism is often associated with pandemic behaviors and lifestyles that are inconsistent with public health recommendations for COVID-19.

Methods: Using national data from the 2021 Crime, Health, and Politics Survey (n = 1743), we formally test the indirect effects of political conservatism (an index of Republican party identification, conservative political orientation, right-wing news media consumption, and 2020 Trump vote) on pandemic lifestyles (an index of social distancing, hand sanitizing, mask usage, and vaccination) through the mechanisms of empathy (concern about the welfare of others), authoritarian beliefs (authoritarian aggressiveness and acquiescence to authority), and pandemic threat perceptions (threats to self and to the broader society).

Result: Our results confirm that political conservatism is associated with riskier pandemic lifestyles. We also find that this association is partially mediated by lower levels of empathy, higher levels of authoritarian beliefs, and lower levels of perceived pandemic threat.

Conclusions: Understanding why political conservatism is associated with riskier pandemic lifestyles may eventually lead us to ways of identifying and overcoming widespread cultural barriers to critical pandemic responses.

政治意识形态与大流行病的生活方式:移情、独裁和威胁的间接影响。
背景:在本文中,我们整合了社会学、心理学和政治学的理论和研究,建立并测试了一个中介模型,该模型有助于解释为什么政治保守主义经常与流行病行为和生活方式相关联,而这些行为和生活方式不符合COVID-19的公共卫生建议:利用 2021 年犯罪、健康和政治调查(n = 1743)中的全国数据,我们正式检验了政治保守主义(共和党党派认同、保守政治倾向、右翼新闻媒体消费和 2020 年特朗普投票的指数)对流行病生活方式(社会疏远指数、手部消毒、口罩使用率、健康指数和 2020 年特朗普投票的指数)的间接影响、手消毒、口罩使用和疫苗接种)的影响,影响机制包括移情(对他人福祉的关注)、专制信仰(专制攻击性和对权威的默许)和流行病威胁感(对自身和更广泛社会的威胁)。结果我们的研究结果证实,政治保守主义与风险较高的大流行病生活方式有关。我们还发现,这种关联部分是由较低的移情水平、较高的独裁信仰水平和较低的大流行病威胁感知水平促成的:了解政治保守主义为何与风险较高的大流行病生活方式相关联,最终可能会帮助我们找到识别和克服关键性大流行病应对措施所面临的广泛文化障碍的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Discover Social Science and Health
Discover Social Science and Health intersection of health and social sciences-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Discover Social Science and Health is an interdisciplinary, international journal that publishes papers at the intersection of the social and biomedical sciences. Papers should integrate, in both theory and measures, a social perspective (reflecting anthropology, criminology, economics, epidemiology, policy, sociology, etc) and a concern for health (mental and physical). Health, broadly construed, includes biological and other indicators of overall health, symptoms, diseases, diagnoses, treatments, treatment adherence, and related concerns. Drawing on diverse, sound methodologies, submissions may include reports of new empirical findings (including important null findings) and replications, reviews and perspectives that construe prior research and discuss future research agendas, methodological research (including the evaluation of measures, samples, and modeling strategies), and short or long commentaries on topics of wide interest. All submissions should include statements of significance with respect to health and future research. Discover Social Science and Health is an Open Access journal that supports the pre-registration of studies. Topics Papers suitable for Discover Social Science and Health will include both social and biomedical theory and data. Illustrative examples of themes include race/ethnicity, sex/gender, socioeconomic, geographic, and other social disparities in health; migration and health; spatial distribution of risk factors and access to healthcare; health and social relationships; interactional processes in healthcare, treatments, and outcomes; life course patterns of health and treatment regimens; cross-national patterns in health and health policies; characteristics of communities and neighborhoods and health; social networks and treatment adherence; stigma and disease progression; methodological studies including psychometric properties of measures frequently used in health research; and commentary and analysis of key concepts, theories, and methods in studies of social science and biomedicine. The journal welcomes submissions that draw on biomarkers of health, genetically-informed and neuroimaging data, psychophysiological measures, and other forms of data that describe physical and mental health, access to health care, treatment, and related constructs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信