Regression Modeling of Individual-Patient Correlated Discrete Outcomes with Applications to Cancer Pain Ratings.

统计学期刊(英文) Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-11 DOI:10.4236/ojs.2022.124029
George J Knafl, Salimah H Meghani
{"title":"Regression Modeling of Individual-Patient Correlated Discrete Outcomes with Applications to Cancer Pain Ratings.","authors":"George J Knafl,&nbsp;Salimah H Meghani","doi":"10.4236/ojs.2022.124029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To formulate and demonstrate methods for regression modeling of probabilities and dispersions for individual-patient longitudinal outcomes taking on discrete numeric values.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three alternatives for modeling of outcome probabilities are considered. Multinomial probabilities are based on different intercepts and slopes for probabilities of different outcome values. Ordinal probabilities are based on different intercepts and the same slope for probabilities of different outcome values. Censored Poisson probabilities are based on the same intercept and slope for probabilities of different outcome values. Parameters are estimated with extended linear mixed modeling maximizing a likelihood-like function based on the multivariate normal density that accounts for within-patient correlation. Formulas are provided for gradient vectors and Hessian matrices for estimating model parameters. The likelihood-like function is also used to compute cross-validation scores for alternative models and to control an adaptive modeling process for identifying possibly nonlinear functional relationships in predictors for probabilities and dispersions. Example analyses are provided of daily pain ratings for a cancer patient over a period of 97 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The censored Poisson approach is preferable for modeling these data, and presumably other data sets of this kind, because it generates a competitive model with fewer parameters in less time than the other two approaches. The generated probabilities for this model are distinctly nonlinear in time while the dispersions are distinctly non-constant over time, demonstrating the need for adaptive modeling of such data. The analyses also address the dependence of these daily pain ratings on time and the daily numbers of pain flares. Probabilities and dispersions change differently over time for different numbers of pain flares.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adaptive modeling of daily pain ratings for individual cancer patients is an effective way to identify nonlinear relationships in time as well as in other predictors such as the number of pain flares.</p>","PeriodicalId":59624,"journal":{"name":"统计学期刊(英文)","volume":"12 4","pages":"456-485"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9410526/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"统计学期刊(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2022.124029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose: To formulate and demonstrate methods for regression modeling of probabilities and dispersions for individual-patient longitudinal outcomes taking on discrete numeric values.

Methods: Three alternatives for modeling of outcome probabilities are considered. Multinomial probabilities are based on different intercepts and slopes for probabilities of different outcome values. Ordinal probabilities are based on different intercepts and the same slope for probabilities of different outcome values. Censored Poisson probabilities are based on the same intercept and slope for probabilities of different outcome values. Parameters are estimated with extended linear mixed modeling maximizing a likelihood-like function based on the multivariate normal density that accounts for within-patient correlation. Formulas are provided for gradient vectors and Hessian matrices for estimating model parameters. The likelihood-like function is also used to compute cross-validation scores for alternative models and to control an adaptive modeling process for identifying possibly nonlinear functional relationships in predictors for probabilities and dispersions. Example analyses are provided of daily pain ratings for a cancer patient over a period of 97 days.

Results: The censored Poisson approach is preferable for modeling these data, and presumably other data sets of this kind, because it generates a competitive model with fewer parameters in less time than the other two approaches. The generated probabilities for this model are distinctly nonlinear in time while the dispersions are distinctly non-constant over time, demonstrating the need for adaptive modeling of such data. The analyses also address the dependence of these daily pain ratings on time and the daily numbers of pain flares. Probabilities and dispersions change differently over time for different numbers of pain flares.

Conclusions: Adaptive modeling of daily pain ratings for individual cancer patients is an effective way to identify nonlinear relationships in time as well as in other predictors such as the number of pain flares.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

个体患者相关离散结果的回归模型与癌症疼痛评分的应用。
目的:制定和演示个体患者纵向结果采用离散数值的概率和分散的回归建模方法。方法:考虑了三种结果概率建模方法。多项概率基于不同结果值的概率的不同截距和斜率。顺序概率基于不同结果值的不同截距和相同的斜率。截尾泊松概率基于不同结果值的概率的相同截距和斜率。参数估计与扩展线性混合建模最大化似然函数基于多元正态密度,考虑患者内相关性。给出了梯度向量和Hessian矩阵估计模型参数的公式。似然函数还用于计算替代模型的交叉验证分数,并控制自适应建模过程,以识别概率和分散度预测器中可能的非线性函数关系。举例分析了一个癌症病人在97天内的每日疼痛等级。结果:删减泊松方法更适合于这些数据的建模,并且可能是其他类型的数据集,因为它比其他两种方法在更短的时间内生成具有更少参数的竞争模型。该模型生成的概率在时间上明显是非线性的,而色散在时间上明显是非恒定的,这表明需要对此类数据进行自适应建模。分析还解决了这些每日疼痛评分对时间和每日疼痛发作次数的依赖。随着时间的推移,不同数量的疼痛爆发的概率和分散度会发生不同的变化。结论:个体癌症患者每日疼痛评分的自适应建模是识别时间非线性关系以及其他预测因素(如疼痛发作次数)的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
571
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信