{"title":"Symptomatic Macromastia and Days Lost from Work.","authors":"Norma I Cruz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the amount of days lost from work by women with symptomatic macromastia while on conservative management and after they undergo breast reduction surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Working women with symptomatic macromastia were requested to record the number of days lost from work as a result of back or neck pain associated with their large breasts during a 6 months period of conservative management required by their health insurance. The conservative management included physical therapy, weight loss and analgesics. A reduction mammoplasty was approved and performed in all the women following the period of conservative management. After the women returned to work, they were again requested to record the number of lost work days associated with back/neck pain during the next 6 months. Basic demographic information was also obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred twenty-three women with symptomatic macromastia participated. The mean age was 31±10, the mean body mass index was 29±4, mean bra size was 38-D, 45% had a college degree or higher, and 90% had full-time employment. The mean number of lost work days was 6±3 with conservative and 1±1 with surgical management in a 6 months period, a difference that was statistically significant (p<0.05). Based on gender-specific median wage rates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, these lost days represent an economic loss of $1,642 annually per woman in conservative management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgical treatment of breast hypertrophy resulted in significantly less days lost from work. There is a higher cost in loss productivity with conservative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":54529,"journal":{"name":"Puerto Rico Health Sciences Journal","volume":" ","pages":"157-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Puerto Rico Health Sciences Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To compare the amount of days lost from work by women with symptomatic macromastia while on conservative management and after they undergo breast reduction surgery.
Methods: Working women with symptomatic macromastia were requested to record the number of days lost from work as a result of back or neck pain associated with their large breasts during a 6 months period of conservative management required by their health insurance. The conservative management included physical therapy, weight loss and analgesics. A reduction mammoplasty was approved and performed in all the women following the period of conservative management. After the women returned to work, they were again requested to record the number of lost work days associated with back/neck pain during the next 6 months. Basic demographic information was also obtained.
Results: One hundred twenty-three women with symptomatic macromastia participated. The mean age was 31±10, the mean body mass index was 29±4, mean bra size was 38-D, 45% had a college degree or higher, and 90% had full-time employment. The mean number of lost work days was 6±3 with conservative and 1±1 with surgical management in a 6 months period, a difference that was statistically significant (p<0.05). Based on gender-specific median wage rates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, these lost days represent an economic loss of $1,642 annually per woman in conservative management.
Conclusion: Surgical treatment of breast hypertrophy resulted in significantly less days lost from work. There is a higher cost in loss productivity with conservative management.
期刊介绍:
The Puerto Rico Health Sciences Journal (PRHSJ) is the scientific journal of the University of Puerto Rico Medical Sciences Campus. It was founded in 1982 as a vehicle for the publication of reports on scientific research conducted in-campus, Puerto Rico and abroad. All published work is original and peer-reviewed. The PRHSJ is included in PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, Latindex, EBSCO, SHERPA/RoMEO, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch®) and Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition. All papers are published both online and in hard copy. From its beginning, the PRHSJ is being published regularly four times a year. The scope of the journal includes a range of medical, dental, public health, pharmaceutical and biosocial sciences research. The journal publishes full-length articles, brief reports, special articles, reviews, editorials, case reports, clinical images, and letters arising from published material.