Jahan Porhomayon, Sina Davari Farid, Ali A El-Solh, Ghazaleh Adlparvar, Nader D Nader
{"title":"THE IMPACT OF ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE VS. LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY ON THE INCIDENCE OF POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING: A SYSTEMIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.","authors":"Jahan Porhomayon, Sina Davari Farid, Ali A El-Solh, Ghazaleh Adlparvar, Nader D Nader","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the impact of Endotracheal tube (ETT) vs. Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Key words searching from databases such as Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library provided 14 studies focusing on the use of EET vs. LMA for general anesthesia. Pooled estimate of relative risk with 95% confidence interval using random effect model was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>14 studies were selected for meta-analysis with a total of 1866 patients. 9 studies focused on the outcome of PONV in adult patients. It showed incidence of PONV with of LMA and ETT in adult of about 204/690 (30%) and 145/725 (20%) respectively with [Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.69, 95% CI, 0.76-3.75, P = 0.20]. Heterogeneity was high (I2 = 87%). Five studies focused on the outcome of PONV in pediatric patients with PONV in LMA and ETT group of 85/229 (37%) and 72/222 (32%) respectively with (OR = 1.30, 95% CI, 0.61-2.76, P = 0.50). Heterogeneity was moderate at (I2 = 53%). When all patients were combined heterogeneity was high at 81% with OR = 1.56, 95% CI, 0.87-2.79, P = 0.14.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Risk of PONV shows an increase trend toward the use of LMA. Larger randomized trials are needed to assess the impact of airway devices on PONV.</p>","PeriodicalId":35975,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"23 1","pages":"9-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the impact of Endotracheal tube (ETT) vs. Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia.
Methods: Key words searching from databases such as Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library provided 14 studies focusing on the use of EET vs. LMA for general anesthesia. Pooled estimate of relative risk with 95% confidence interval using random effect model was conducted.
Results: 14 studies were selected for meta-analysis with a total of 1866 patients. 9 studies focused on the outcome of PONV in adult patients. It showed incidence of PONV with of LMA and ETT in adult of about 204/690 (30%) and 145/725 (20%) respectively with [Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.69, 95% CI, 0.76-3.75, P = 0.20]. Heterogeneity was high (I2 = 87%). Five studies focused on the outcome of PONV in pediatric patients with PONV in LMA and ETT group of 85/229 (37%) and 72/222 (32%) respectively with (OR = 1.30, 95% CI, 0.61-2.76, P = 0.50). Heterogeneity was moderate at (I2 = 53%). When all patients were combined heterogeneity was high at 81% with OR = 1.56, 95% CI, 0.87-2.79, P = 0.14.
Conclusion: Risk of PONV shows an increase trend toward the use of LMA. Larger randomized trials are needed to assess the impact of airway devices on PONV.
期刊介绍:
The journal is published three times a year (February, June, and October) and has an Editorial Executive Committee from the department and consultant editors from various Arab countries. A volume consists of six issues. Presently, it is in its 42nd year of publication and is currently in its 19th volume. It has a worldwide circulation and effective March 2008, the MEJA has become an electronic journal. The main objective of the journal is to act as a forum for publication, education, and exchange of opinions, and to promote research and publications of the Middle Eastern heritage of medicine and anesthesia.