Reaching for the Unreachable: Reorganization of Reaching with Walking.

Beata J Grzyb, Linda B Smith, Angel P Del Pobil
{"title":"Reaching for the Unreachable: Reorganization of Reaching with Walking.","authors":"Beata J Grzyb, Linda B Smith, Angel P Del Pobil","doi":"10.1109/TAMD.2013.2255872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research suggests that reaching and walking behaviors may be linked developmentally as reaching changes at the onset of walking. Here we report new evidence on an apparent loss of the distinction between the reachable and nonreachable distances as children start walking. The experiment compared nonwalkers, walkers with help, and independent walkers in a reaching task to targets at varying distances. Reaching attempts, contact, leaning, and communication behaviors were recorded. Most of the children reached for the unreachable objects the first time it was presented. Nonwalkers, however, reached less on the subsequent trials showing clear adjustment of their reaching decisions with the failures. On the contrary, walkers consistently attempted reaches to targets at unreachable distances. We suggest that these reaching errors may result from inappropriate integration of reaching and locomotor actions, attention control and near/far visual space. We propose a reward-mediated model implemented on a NAO humanoid robot that replicates the main results from our study showing an increase in reaching attempts to nonreachable distances after the onset of walking.</p>","PeriodicalId":49193,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development","volume":"5 2","pages":"162-172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4476390/pdf/nihms692559.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TAMD.2013.2255872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research suggests that reaching and walking behaviors may be linked developmentally as reaching changes at the onset of walking. Here we report new evidence on an apparent loss of the distinction between the reachable and nonreachable distances as children start walking. The experiment compared nonwalkers, walkers with help, and independent walkers in a reaching task to targets at varying distances. Reaching attempts, contact, leaning, and communication behaviors were recorded. Most of the children reached for the unreachable objects the first time it was presented. Nonwalkers, however, reached less on the subsequent trials showing clear adjustment of their reaching decisions with the failures. On the contrary, walkers consistently attempted reaches to targets at unreachable distances. We suggest that these reaching errors may result from inappropriate integration of reaching and locomotor actions, attention control and near/far visual space. We propose a reward-mediated model implemented on a NAO humanoid robot that replicates the main results from our study showing an increase in reaching attempts to nonreachable distances after the onset of walking.

接触无法接触的人:重组 "用走的方式到达"。
以前的研究表明,伸手和行走行为在发育过程中可能存在联系,因为伸手行为在开始行走时会发生变化。在此,我们报告了一些新的证据,证明儿童在开始行走时明显失去了对可够到的距离和不可够到的距离的区分。实验比较了非步行者、在他人帮助下步行者和独立步行者对不同距离目标的伸手任务。实验记录了儿童的伸手尝试、接触、倾斜和交流行为。大多数儿童在第一次出现无法触及的物体时都会伸手去够。然而,非步行者在随后的试验中伸手的次数较少,这表明他们的伸手决定在失败后会有明显的调整。相反,学步儿童却总是试图伸手去够无法够到的目标。我们认为,这些伸手错误可能是由于伸手动作与运动动作、注意力控制和近/远视觉空间的不恰当整合造成的。我们提出了一个在 NAO 人形机器人上实施的奖励中介模型,该模型复制了我们研究的主要结果,即在开始步行后,对不可触及距离的伸手尝试有所增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development
IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-ROBOTICS
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信