Assessing intern handover processes.

The clinical teacher Pub Date : 2016-06-01 Epub Date: 2015-06-18 DOI:10.1111/tct.12404
Robert Habicht, Lauren Block, Kathryn Novello Silva, Nora Oliver, Albert Wu, Leonard Feldman
{"title":"Assessing intern handover processes.","authors":"Robert Habicht,&nbsp;Lauren Block,&nbsp;Kathryn Novello Silva,&nbsp;Nora Oliver,&nbsp;Albert Wu,&nbsp;Leonard Feldman","doi":"10.1111/tct.12404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>New standards for resident work hours set in 2011 changed the landscape of patient care in teaching hospitals, and resulted in new challenges for US residency training programmes to overcome. One such challenge was a dramatic increase in the number of patient handovers performed by residents. As a result, there is a renewed focus for clinical teachers to develop educational strategies to optimise the patient handover process and improve the quality of patient care and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In order to investigate current gaps in resident handovers, we examined the handover processes performed by medicine interns at two academic medical centres in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. We used trained observers to collect data on whether handovers were conducted face to face, with questions asked, in private locations, with written documentation, and without distractions or interruptions. Results were analysed using chi-square tests, and adjusted for clustering at the observer and intern levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interns successfully conducted handovers face to face (99.5%), asked questions (85.3%), used private locations (91%), included written handover documentation (95.8%) and did not experience distractions for the majority of the time (87.7%); however, interruptions were pervasive, occurring 41.3 per cent of the time. In order to investigate current gaps in resident handovers, we examined the handover processes performed by medicine interns</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Interns conducted patient handovers face to face, with questions asked, in private locations, with written documentation and without distractions the majority of the time; however, interruptions during the handover process were common. Exploring gaps at the individual programme level is a critical first step to develop effective teaching strategies to optimise handovers in residency.</p>","PeriodicalId":74987,"journal":{"name":"The clinical teacher","volume":"13 3","pages":"187-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/tct.12404","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The clinical teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: New standards for resident work hours set in 2011 changed the landscape of patient care in teaching hospitals, and resulted in new challenges for US residency training programmes to overcome. One such challenge was a dramatic increase in the number of patient handovers performed by residents. As a result, there is a renewed focus for clinical teachers to develop educational strategies to optimise the patient handover process and improve the quality of patient care and safety.

Methods: In order to investigate current gaps in resident handovers, we examined the handover processes performed by medicine interns at two academic medical centres in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. We used trained observers to collect data on whether handovers were conducted face to face, with questions asked, in private locations, with written documentation, and without distractions or interruptions. Results were analysed using chi-square tests, and adjusted for clustering at the observer and intern levels.

Results: Interns successfully conducted handovers face to face (99.5%), asked questions (85.3%), used private locations (91%), included written handover documentation (95.8%) and did not experience distractions for the majority of the time (87.7%); however, interruptions were pervasive, occurring 41.3 per cent of the time. In order to investigate current gaps in resident handovers, we examined the handover processes performed by medicine interns

Discussion: Interns conducted patient handovers face to face, with questions asked, in private locations, with written documentation and without distractions the majority of the time; however, interruptions during the handover process were common. Exploring gaps at the individual programme level is a critical first step to develop effective teaching strategies to optimise handovers in residency.

评估实习生交接流程。
背景:2011年制定的住院医师工作时间新标准改变了教学医院患者护理的格局,并为美国住院医师培训方案带来了新的挑战。其中一个挑战是由住院医生完成的病人移交数量的急剧增加。因此,临床教师重新关注制定教育策略,以优化患者移交过程,提高患者护理质量和安全。方法:为了调查目前住院医生移交的差距,我们调查了美国马里兰州巴尔的摩两家学术医疗中心的医学实习生进行的移交过程。我们使用训练有素的观察员来收集数据,以确定移交是否面对面进行,是否有提问,是否在私人场所进行,是否有书面文件,是否没有干扰或中断。使用卡方检验对结果进行分析,并根据观察者和实习生水平的聚类进行调整。结果:实习生成功地进行了面对面的交接(99.5%),提问(85.3%),使用私人场所(91%),包括书面交接文件(95.8%),并且在大多数时间内没有分心(87.7%);然而,打扰很普遍,占41.3%的时间。为了调查目前住院医生移交的差距,我们检查了医学实习生执行的移交过程。讨论:实习生在私人场所面对面地进行病人移交,提出问题,有书面文件,大多数时候没有分心;然而,在交接过程中,中断是很常见的。探索个别项目层面的差距是制定有效教学策略以优化住院医师交接的关键第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信