Improving patient notification of solid abdominal viscera incidental findings with a standardized protocol.

Journal of trauma management & outcomes Pub Date : 2015-02-04 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s13032-014-0022-x
Courtney E Collins, Nicole Cherng, Theodore McDade, Babak Movahedi, Timothy A Emhoff, Giles F Whalen, Jennifer LaFemina, Jon D Dorfman
{"title":"Improving patient notification of solid abdominal viscera incidental findings with a standardized protocol.","authors":"Courtney E Collins,&nbsp;Nicole Cherng,&nbsp;Theodore McDade,&nbsp;Babak Movahedi,&nbsp;Timothy A Emhoff,&nbsp;Giles F Whalen,&nbsp;Jennifer LaFemina,&nbsp;Jon D Dorfman","doi":"10.1186/s13032-014-0022-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing use of computed tomography (CT) scans in the evaluation of trauma patients has led to increased detection of incidental radiologic findings. Incidental findings (IFs) of the abdominal viscera are among the most commonly discovered lesions and can carry a risk of malignancy. Despite this, patient notification regarding these findings is often inadequate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified patients who underwent abdominopelvic CTs as part of their trauma evaluation during a recent 1-year period (9/2011-8/2012). Patients with IFs of the kidneys, liver, adrenal glands, pancreas and/or ovaries had their charts reviewed for documentation of the lesion in their discharge paperwork or follow-up. A quality improvement project was initiated where patients with abdominal IFs were verbally informed of the finding, it was noted on their discharge summary and/or were referred to specialists for evaluation. Nine months after the implementation of the IF protocol, a second chart review was performed to determine if the rate of patient notification improved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,117 trauma patients undergoing abdominopelvic CT scans during the 21 month study period, 239 patients (21.4%) had 292 incidental abdominal findings. Renal lesions were the most common (146 patients, 13% of all patients) followed by hepatic (95/8.4%) and adrenal (38/3.4%) lesions. Pancreatic (10/0.9%) and ovarian lesions (3/0.3%) were uncommon. Post-IF protocol implementation patient notification regarding IFs improved by over 80% (32.4% vs. 17.7% pre-protocol, p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IFs of the solid abdominal organs are common in trauma patients undergoing abdominopelvic CT scan. Patient notification regarding these lesions is often inadequate. A systematic approach to the documentation and evaluation of incidental radiologic findings can significantly improve the rate of patient notification.</p>","PeriodicalId":87652,"journal":{"name":"Journal of trauma management & outcomes","volume":"9 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13032-014-0022-x","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of trauma management & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13032-014-0022-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Background: The increasing use of computed tomography (CT) scans in the evaluation of trauma patients has led to increased detection of incidental radiologic findings. Incidental findings (IFs) of the abdominal viscera are among the most commonly discovered lesions and can carry a risk of malignancy. Despite this, patient notification regarding these findings is often inadequate.

Methods: We identified patients who underwent abdominopelvic CTs as part of their trauma evaluation during a recent 1-year period (9/2011-8/2012). Patients with IFs of the kidneys, liver, adrenal glands, pancreas and/or ovaries had their charts reviewed for documentation of the lesion in their discharge paperwork or follow-up. A quality improvement project was initiated where patients with abdominal IFs were verbally informed of the finding, it was noted on their discharge summary and/or were referred to specialists for evaluation. Nine months after the implementation of the IF protocol, a second chart review was performed to determine if the rate of patient notification improved.

Results: Of 1,117 trauma patients undergoing abdominopelvic CT scans during the 21 month study period, 239 patients (21.4%) had 292 incidental abdominal findings. Renal lesions were the most common (146 patients, 13% of all patients) followed by hepatic (95/8.4%) and adrenal (38/3.4%) lesions. Pancreatic (10/0.9%) and ovarian lesions (3/0.3%) were uncommon. Post-IF protocol implementation patient notification regarding IFs improved by over 80% (32.4% vs. 17.7% pre-protocol, p = 0.02).

Conclusion: IFs of the solid abdominal organs are common in trauma patients undergoing abdominopelvic CT scan. Patient notification regarding these lesions is often inadequate. A systematic approach to the documentation and evaluation of incidental radiologic findings can significantly improve the rate of patient notification.

用标准化的方案提高病人对腹部实性脏器意外发现的通报。
背景:在创伤患者的评估中越来越多地使用计算机断层扫描(CT),这导致了偶然放射学发现的增加。腹部脏器的偶然发现(if)是最常见的病变之一,可携带恶性肿瘤的风险。尽管如此,关于这些发现的患者通知往往是不充分的。方法:我们选取了近1年(2011年9月- 2012年8月)期间接受过腹部骨盆ct检查的患者作为其创伤评估的一部分。对于肾脏、肝脏、肾上腺、胰腺和/或卵巢的IFs患者,在出院文件或随访中检查了他们的图表,以记录病变。我们启动了一项质量改进项目,口头告知腹部症状患者这一发现,并将其记录在出院总结上,或将其转介给专家进行评估。在IF方案实施9个月后,进行第二次图表审查,以确定患者通知率是否得到改善。结果:在21个月的研究期间,1117例创伤患者接受了骨盆CT扫描,239例(21.4%)患者有292个附带腹部发现。肾脏病变最常见(146例,占全部患者的13%),其次是肝脏病变(95/8.4%)和肾上腺病变(38/3.4%)。胰腺(10/0.9%)和卵巢(3/0.3%)病变少见。if方案实施后,患者关于if的通知率提高了80%以上(32.4% vs.方案前的17.7%,p = 0.02)。结论:颅脑外伤患者行盆腔CT扫描时,腹部实性脏器常可见IFs。关于这些病变的患者通知通常是不充分的。一个系统的方法来记录和评估偶然的放射学发现可以显著提高病人的通知率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书