Ulna Nerve Decompression at the Elbow in Patients with Normal Nerve Conduction Tests.

Gareth L Roberts, Angus D Maclean, Andrew J Logan
{"title":"Ulna Nerve Decompression at the Elbow in Patients with Normal Nerve Conduction Tests.","authors":"Gareth L Roberts,&nbsp;Angus D Maclean,&nbsp;Andrew J Logan","doi":"10.1142/S0218810415500215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ulna nerve compression at the elbow is the second most common neuropathy of the upper limb. It has been suggested that nerve conduction tests are required to correctly make the diagnosis. The aim of this study was to assess whether patients with normal nerve conduction testing benefitted from surgical release of the ulna nerve.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>56 patients with symptoms of ulna nerve compression at the elbow were evaluated prospectively. All patients underwent electrophysiology testing followed by ulna nerve decompression irrespective of the results of the electrophysiology testing. Functional scores using the QuickDASH and PEM score were collected up to 12 months post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No difference was found between the group with normal and the group with abnormal electrophysiology studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We conclude that patients who clinically have ulna nerve compression still benefit from ulna nerve decompression despite normal nerve conduction tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":80280,"journal":{"name":"Hand surgery : an international journal devoted to hand and upper limb surgery and related research : journal of the Asia-Pacific Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand","volume":"20 2","pages":"260-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1142/S0218810415500215","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand surgery : an international journal devoted to hand and upper limb surgery and related research : journal of the Asia-Pacific Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218810415500215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Ulna nerve compression at the elbow is the second most common neuropathy of the upper limb. It has been suggested that nerve conduction tests are required to correctly make the diagnosis. The aim of this study was to assess whether patients with normal nerve conduction testing benefitted from surgical release of the ulna nerve.

Methods: 56 patients with symptoms of ulna nerve compression at the elbow were evaluated prospectively. All patients underwent electrophysiology testing followed by ulna nerve decompression irrespective of the results of the electrophysiology testing. Functional scores using the QuickDASH and PEM score were collected up to 12 months post-surgery.

Results: No difference was found between the group with normal and the group with abnormal electrophysiology studies.

Conclusions: We conclude that patients who clinically have ulna nerve compression still benefit from ulna nerve decompression despite normal nerve conduction tests.

神经传导试验正常患者肘部尺骨神经减压。
背景:肘部尺骨神经压迫是上肢第二常见的神经病变。有人建议需要神经传导测试来正确诊断。本研究的目的是评估神经传导测试正常的患者是否受益于手术释放尺骨神经。方法:对56例有肘部尺骨神经压迫症状的患者进行前瞻性评价。无论电生理测试结果如何,所有患者都进行了电生理测试,然后进行了尺骨神经减压。使用QuickDASH和PEM评分收集术后12个月的功能评分。结果:电生理正常组与异常组无明显差异。结论:我们得出结论,尽管进行了正常的神经传导测试,但临床上有尺骨神经压迫的患者仍然受益于尺骨神经减压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书