{"title":"Effects of electroacupuncture on overactive bladder refractory to anticholinergics: a single-blind randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Jie Zhang, Wei Cheng, Mingming Cai","doi":"10.1136/acupmed-2015-010770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the clinical effects and safety of electroacupuncture (EA) in the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) refractory to first-line anticholinergic treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women diagnosed with OAB who were refractory to first-line anticholinergic treatment were referred for EA therapy. 50 women enrolled in this single-blind randomised controlled trial and were randomised 1:1 to EA or sham EA (SEA). The EA and SEA groups were treated with 30 sessions (5 sessions a week for 6 weeks), and each session lasted 30 min. OAB symptom scores (OABSS), King's Health Questionnaire scores (KHQ) and urodynamic parameters were used to assess treatment effects. Safety was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>45 women completed all aspects of the study (23 in the EA group and 22 in the SEA group). The OABSS and KHQ showed statistically significant improvements in the EA group compared with the SEA group after 6 weeks of treatment (p<0.05). There were no statistical differences in the maximum flow rate and postvoid residual (p>0.05), but there were statistical improvements in the first sensation of bladder filling, first urge to void and maximum cystometric capacity (p<0.05) in the EA group compared with the SEA group. No serious adverse events occurred in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EA appears to be an effective, safe and minimally invasive treatment for women with OAB. Further studies with longer follow-up are needed to evaluate whether it could be a therapeutic option for OAB refractory to treatment with anticholinergics.</p>","PeriodicalId":378725,"journal":{"name":"Acupuncture in medicine : journal of the British Medical Acupuncture Society","volume":" ","pages":"368-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/acupmed-2015-010770","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acupuncture in medicine : journal of the British Medical Acupuncture Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/acupmed-2015-010770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the clinical effects and safety of electroacupuncture (EA) in the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) refractory to first-line anticholinergic treatment.
Methods: Women diagnosed with OAB who were refractory to first-line anticholinergic treatment were referred for EA therapy. 50 women enrolled in this single-blind randomised controlled trial and were randomised 1:1 to EA or sham EA (SEA). The EA and SEA groups were treated with 30 sessions (5 sessions a week for 6 weeks), and each session lasted 30 min. OAB symptom scores (OABSS), King's Health Questionnaire scores (KHQ) and urodynamic parameters were used to assess treatment effects. Safety was also evaluated.
Results: 45 women completed all aspects of the study (23 in the EA group and 22 in the SEA group). The OABSS and KHQ showed statistically significant improvements in the EA group compared with the SEA group after 6 weeks of treatment (p<0.05). There were no statistical differences in the maximum flow rate and postvoid residual (p>0.05), but there were statistical improvements in the first sensation of bladder filling, first urge to void and maximum cystometric capacity (p<0.05) in the EA group compared with the SEA group. No serious adverse events occurred in either group.
Conclusions: EA appears to be an effective, safe and minimally invasive treatment for women with OAB. Further studies with longer follow-up are needed to evaluate whether it could be a therapeutic option for OAB refractory to treatment with anticholinergics.
目的:探讨电针(EA)治疗一线抗胆碱能治疗难治性膀胱过动症(OAB)的临床疗效和安全性。方法:对一线抗胆碱能治疗难治性OAB的妇女进行EA治疗。50名妇女参加了这项单盲随机对照试验,并按1:1的比例随机分配到EA或假EA (SEA)组。EA组和SEA组共治疗30次(每周5次,共6周),每次治疗持续30分钟。采用OAB症状评分(OABSS)、King’s Health Questionnaire评分(KHQ)和尿动力学参数评估治疗效果。安全性也进行了评估。结果:45名妇女完成了研究的所有方面(EA组23名,SEA组22名)。治疗6周后,EA组OABSS和KHQ较SEA组改善有统计学意义(p0.05),但膀胱第一充溢感、第一次排空冲动和最大膀胱容量改善有统计学意义(p结论:EA似乎是一种有效、安全、微创的治疗OAB女性的方法。需要进一步的研究和更长时间的随访来评估它是否可以作为抗胆碱能药物治疗难治性OAB的治疗选择。