The initial experience of the upper abdominal CT angiography using low-concentration contrast medium on dual energy spectral CT.

Lei Xin, Xiaotang Yang, Ning Huang, Xiaosong Du, Jianxin Zhang, Yanyan Wang, Lina Hou, Jinfang Gao
{"title":"The initial experience of the upper abdominal CT angiography using low-concentration contrast medium on dual energy spectral CT.","authors":"Lei Xin,&nbsp;Xiaotang Yang,&nbsp;Ning Huang,&nbsp;Xiaosong Du,&nbsp;Jianxin Zhang,&nbsp;Yanyan Wang,&nbsp;Lina Hou,&nbsp;Jinfang Gao","doi":"10.1007/s00261-015-0462-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the feasibility of using Spectral CT imaging with low contrast medium in abdominal CT angiography (CTA).</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>70 consecutive patients (40 men, 42.6 ± 20.4 years; 30 women, 46.7 ± 18.8 years) with suspected abdominal focal lesions were referred to CTA exam. They were randomly assigned into two groups. Group A: 35 patients underwent conventional CT scan of Tube voltage 120 kVp, automatic current modulation with a Noise Index of 12, ASIR 30%, and injected with Iohexol (350 mgI/ml). Group B: 35 patients underwent Spectral CT Imaging, with Tube current of 600 mA, injected with Iodixanol (270 mgI/ml). The optimal mono-energy keV was achieved using the optimal contrast noise ratio in abdominal aorta at the renal artery level relative to the erector spine muscle. Both groups were injected with an injection rate of 3.5 ml/s, and a contrast volume of 1.5 ml/kg body weight. The Hounsfield units (HU) and noise of the bilateral renal arteries and muscle of both groups, as well as the optimal monochromatic image set of Group B were measured. Two radiologists assessed all images with a 5-points scale. CTDIvol and DLP were recorded. Data were analyzed using student t test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total iodine intake of Group B was 28% lower than that of Group A. The CNR of abdomen artery, celiac trunk, superior mesenteric artery, and renal artery in spectral group (at the best mono-energy of 53.0 keV) were higher than those in conventional CTA group (p < 0.001). The subjective image quality score of spectral CTA group was also rated higher than conventional CTA group (p < 0.001). CTDIvol, DLP, and effective dose of spectral group were all lower than conventional group, but there were no significant differences (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With 28% contrast medium reduction and reduced radiation dose, CT angiography using spectral imaging and lower concentration contrast agent provided better image quality than conventional CTA.</p>","PeriodicalId":7014,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Imaging","volume":"40 7","pages":"2894-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00261-015-0462-4","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0462-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the feasibility of using Spectral CT imaging with low contrast medium in abdominal CT angiography (CTA).

Subjects and methods: 70 consecutive patients (40 men, 42.6 ± 20.4 years; 30 women, 46.7 ± 18.8 years) with suspected abdominal focal lesions were referred to CTA exam. They were randomly assigned into two groups. Group A: 35 patients underwent conventional CT scan of Tube voltage 120 kVp, automatic current modulation with a Noise Index of 12, ASIR 30%, and injected with Iohexol (350 mgI/ml). Group B: 35 patients underwent Spectral CT Imaging, with Tube current of 600 mA, injected with Iodixanol (270 mgI/ml). The optimal mono-energy keV was achieved using the optimal contrast noise ratio in abdominal aorta at the renal artery level relative to the erector spine muscle. Both groups were injected with an injection rate of 3.5 ml/s, and a contrast volume of 1.5 ml/kg body weight. The Hounsfield units (HU) and noise of the bilateral renal arteries and muscle of both groups, as well as the optimal monochromatic image set of Group B were measured. Two radiologists assessed all images with a 5-points scale. CTDIvol and DLP were recorded. Data were analyzed using student t test.

Results: The total iodine intake of Group B was 28% lower than that of Group A. The CNR of abdomen artery, celiac trunk, superior mesenteric artery, and renal artery in spectral group (at the best mono-energy of 53.0 keV) were higher than those in conventional CTA group (p < 0.001). The subjective image quality score of spectral CTA group was also rated higher than conventional CTA group (p < 0.001). CTDIvol, DLP, and effective dose of spectral group were all lower than conventional group, but there were no significant differences (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: With 28% contrast medium reduction and reduced radiation dose, CT angiography using spectral imaging and lower concentration contrast agent provided better image quality than conventional CTA.

双能谱CT低浓度造影剂对上腹部血管造影的初步体会。
目的:探讨低衬成像在腹部CT血管造影(CTA)中的可行性。对象与方法:连续70例患者(男性40例,42.6±20.4岁;30例(46.7±18.8岁)疑似腹部局灶性病变的妇女行CTA检查。他们被随机分为两组。A组:35例患者行常规CT扫描,管电压120 kVp,电流自动调制,噪声指数12,ASIR 30%,注射碘己醇(350 mgI/ml)。B组:35例患者行光谱CT成像,管电流600 mA,注射碘沙醇(270 mgI/ml)。利用腹主动脉肾动脉水平相对于竖脊肌的最佳对比噪声比获得最佳单能量keV。两组注射速度均为3.5 ml/s,造影剂体积为1.5 ml/kg体重。测量两组双侧肾动脉和肌肉的Hounsfield单位(HU)和噪声,以及B组最优单色图像集。两名放射科医生以5分制评估所有图像。记录CTDIvol和DLP。数据分析采用学生t检验。结果:B组总碘摄入量比a组低28%,光谱组腹动脉、腹腔干、肠系膜上动脉、肾动脉CNR(单能量最高为53.0 keV)高于常规CTA组(p < 0.05)。结论:在减少造影剂28%、降低辐射剂量的情况下,采用光谱成像和低浓度造影剂的CT血管造影比常规CTA成像质量更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Abdominal Imaging
Abdominal Imaging 医学-核医学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信