The associations between 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) intensity and taste intensities differ by TAS2R38 haplotype.

Q Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Journal of Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics Pub Date : 2014-01-01 Epub Date: 2015-01-27 DOI:10.1159/000371552
Mary E Fischer, Karen J Cruickshanks, James S Pankow, Nathan Pankratz, Carla R Schubert, Guan-Hua Huang, Barbara E K Klein, Ronald Klein, Alex Pinto
{"title":"The associations between 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) intensity and taste intensities differ by TAS2R38 haplotype.","authors":"Mary E Fischer,&nbsp;Karen J Cruickshanks,&nbsp;James S Pankow,&nbsp;Nathan Pankratz,&nbsp;Carla R Schubert,&nbsp;Guan-Hua Huang,&nbsp;Barbara E K Klein,&nbsp;Ronald Klein,&nbsp;Alex Pinto","doi":"10.1159/000371552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>The influence of TAS2R38 haplotype on the relationship between the perceived intensity of propylthiouracil (PROP) and the basic tastes of salt, sweet, sour, and bitter (quinine) was evaluated in the Beaver Dam Offspring Study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Genotyping was performed on 1,670 participants aged ≥45 years (mean age = 54.4; range = 45-84), and suprathreshold taste intensity was measured using filter paper disks and a general labeled magnitude scale (0-100).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among those with taste intensity data and the PAV or AVI haplotype (n = 1,258), the mean perceived intensity of PROP was 37.3 (SD = 30.0), but it varied significantly (p < 0.0001) by diplotype (PAV/PAV = 60.1; PAV/AVI = 46.5; AVI/AVI = 14.4). PROP intensity was correlated with the basic taste intensities (salt: r = 0.22; sweet: r = 0.25; sour: r = 0.21; quinine bitterness: r = 0.38; p < 0.001 for all tastes); however, a significant effect modification of the PROP-taste intensity relationships by TAS2R38 diplotype was observed. There was a stronger association between PROP and each of the basic tastes in the PAV/PAV diplotype group than in the other groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Directly measuring the perceived intensity of the 4 tastes, rather than using PROP intensity as an indicator of taste responsiveness, is recommended for studies of taste perception.</p>","PeriodicalId":54779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics","volume":"7 3","pages":"143-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000371552","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000371552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

Background/aims: The influence of TAS2R38 haplotype on the relationship between the perceived intensity of propylthiouracil (PROP) and the basic tastes of salt, sweet, sour, and bitter (quinine) was evaluated in the Beaver Dam Offspring Study.

Methods: Genotyping was performed on 1,670 participants aged ≥45 years (mean age = 54.4; range = 45-84), and suprathreshold taste intensity was measured using filter paper disks and a general labeled magnitude scale (0-100).

Results: Among those with taste intensity data and the PAV or AVI haplotype (n = 1,258), the mean perceived intensity of PROP was 37.3 (SD = 30.0), but it varied significantly (p < 0.0001) by diplotype (PAV/PAV = 60.1; PAV/AVI = 46.5; AVI/AVI = 14.4). PROP intensity was correlated with the basic taste intensities (salt: r = 0.22; sweet: r = 0.25; sour: r = 0.21; quinine bitterness: r = 0.38; p < 0.001 for all tastes); however, a significant effect modification of the PROP-taste intensity relationships by TAS2R38 diplotype was observed. There was a stronger association between PROP and each of the basic tastes in the PAV/PAV diplotype group than in the other groups.

Conclusions: Directly measuring the perceived intensity of the 4 tastes, rather than using PROP intensity as an indicator of taste responsiveness, is recommended for studies of taste perception.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

6-n-丙基硫尿嘧啶(PROP)强度与味觉强度之间的关系因TAS2R38单倍型而异。
背景/目的:在海狸坝子代研究中,研究了TAS2R38单倍型对丙基硫尿嘧啶(PROP)感知强度与盐、甜、酸、苦(奎宁)等基本味觉之间关系的影响。方法:对1670名年龄≥45岁(平均年龄54.4岁;范围= 45-84),并使用滤纸盘和一般标记等级(0-100)测量超阈值味觉强度。结果:在有味觉强度数据和PAV或AVI单倍型(n = 1,258)的受试者中,PROP的平均感知强度为37.3 (SD = 30.0),但不同双倍型(PAV/PAV = 60.1;Pav / avi = 46.5;Avi / Avi = 14.4)。PROP强度与基本味觉强度相关(盐:r = 0.22;甜度:r = 0.25;酸味:r = 0.21;奎宁苦度:r = 0.38;所有口味的P < 0.001);然而,我们观察到TAS2R38双倍型对prop -味觉强度关系的显著影响。与其他组相比,PAV/PAV双倍型组的PROP与每种基本口味之间的关联更强。结论:在味觉感知的研究中,建议直接测量4种味觉的感知强度,而不是使用PROP强度作为味觉反应的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics
Journal of Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics GENETICS & HEREDITY-NUTRITION & DIETETICS
CiteScore
1.86
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The emerging field of nutrigenetics and nutrigenomics is rapidly gaining importance, and this new international journal has been established to meet the needs of the investigators for a high-quality platform for their research. Endorsed by the recently founded "International Society of Nutrigenetics/Nutrigenomics", the ‘Journal of Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics’ welcomes contributions not only investigating the role of genetic variation in response to diet and that of nutrients in the regulation of gene expression, but is also open for articles covering all aspects of gene-environment interactions in the determination of health and disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信