The introduction of anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin autoantibodies in the laboratory diagnostic process of anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome: 6 months of observation.

Q1 Medicine
Auto-Immunity Highlights Pub Date : 2014-08-14 eCollection Date: 2014-09-01 DOI:10.1007/s13317-014-0061-3
Martina Fabris, Roberta Giacomello, Alessandra Poz, Lisa Pantarotto, Nicolanna Tanzi, Francesco Curcio, Elio Tonutti
{"title":"The introduction of anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin autoantibodies in the laboratory diagnostic process of anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome: 6 months of observation.","authors":"Martina Fabris,&nbsp;Roberta Giacomello,&nbsp;Alessandra Poz,&nbsp;Lisa Pantarotto,&nbsp;Nicolanna Tanzi,&nbsp;Francesco Curcio,&nbsp;Elio Tonutti","doi":"10.1007/s13317-014-0061-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the impact of the introduction of the anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin autoantibodies (aPS/PT) in the laboratory diagnostic process of anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome (APS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four hundred and twenty-one patients (71.5 % females; 53 ± 15 years) presenting a medical prescription for aPS/PT antibodies were consecutively enrolled in the study from March 2013 to August 2013. During the same period, aPS/PT were additionally investigated in a selected series of 62 patients characterized by difficult lupus anticoagulant (LA) tests interpretation and in a retrospective series of 52 LA positive cases with available data about anti-prothrombin (aPT) antibodies. The aPS/PT antibodies, as well as the anti-cardiolipin (aCL), the anti-β2 glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) and the aPT antibodies were analyzed by ELISA. LA was tested according to the recommended criteria, performing both the screen and the confirm steps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, aPS/PT IgM positive (>30 U/ml) and/or IgG frankly positive (>40 U/ml) antibodies were found in 49/421 (11.6 %) cases. Among the LA positive patients, we found 56.1 % aPS/PT positive versus 31.7 % aCL and/or aβ2GPI positive cases, with limited (17.1 %) simultaneous positivity. The PS/PT complex resulted the newly recognized specificity in about 27 % of patients recruited from the subset with difficult LA test interpretation. Compared to aPT antibodies, the aPS/PT antibodies displayed a much higher sensitivity (55.8 versus 15.4 %) in LA positive patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The introduction of aPS/PT antibodies in the diagnostic process of APS is highly recommended, since they disclose a notable diagnostic performance and a high correlation with LA activity, such that they can be a viable alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":8655,"journal":{"name":"Auto-Immunity Highlights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s13317-014-0061-3","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auto-Immunity Highlights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13317-014-0061-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of the introduction of the anti-phosphatidylserine/prothrombin autoantibodies (aPS/PT) in the laboratory diagnostic process of anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome (APS).

Methods: Four hundred and twenty-one patients (71.5 % females; 53 ± 15 years) presenting a medical prescription for aPS/PT antibodies were consecutively enrolled in the study from March 2013 to August 2013. During the same period, aPS/PT were additionally investigated in a selected series of 62 patients characterized by difficult lupus anticoagulant (LA) tests interpretation and in a retrospective series of 52 LA positive cases with available data about anti-prothrombin (aPT) antibodies. The aPS/PT antibodies, as well as the anti-cardiolipin (aCL), the anti-β2 glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) and the aPT antibodies were analyzed by ELISA. LA was tested according to the recommended criteria, performing both the screen and the confirm steps.

Results: Overall, aPS/PT IgM positive (>30 U/ml) and/or IgG frankly positive (>40 U/ml) antibodies were found in 49/421 (11.6 %) cases. Among the LA positive patients, we found 56.1 % aPS/PT positive versus 31.7 % aCL and/or aβ2GPI positive cases, with limited (17.1 %) simultaneous positivity. The PS/PT complex resulted the newly recognized specificity in about 27 % of patients recruited from the subset with difficult LA test interpretation. Compared to aPT antibodies, the aPS/PT antibodies displayed a much higher sensitivity (55.8 versus 15.4 %) in LA positive patients.

Conclusions: The introduction of aPS/PT antibodies in the diagnostic process of APS is highly recommended, since they disclose a notable diagnostic performance and a high correlation with LA activity, such that they can be a viable alternative.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

抗磷脂抗体综合征实验室诊断过程中引入抗磷脂酰丝氨酸/凝血酶原自身抗体:6个月观察
目的:评价引入抗磷脂酰丝氨酸/凝血酶原自身抗体(aPS/PT)在抗磷脂抗体综合征(aPS)实验室诊断过程中的影响。方法:421例患者(女性71.5%;于2013年3月至2013年8月连续入组服用ap /PT抗体处方的53±15岁患者。在同一时期,对62例狼疮抗凝血剂(LA)试验难以解释的患者和52例LA阳性的具有抗凝血酶原(aPT)抗体可用数据的回顾性患者进行了aPS/PT的研究。ELISA法检测aPS/PT抗体、抗心磷脂(aCL)、抗β2糖蛋白I (a -β 2gpi)和aPT抗体。根据推荐的标准对LA进行测试,执行筛选和确认步骤。结果:421例患者中,ap /PT IgM抗体阳性(>30 U/ml)和IgG抗体明显阳性(>40 U/ml)者49例(11.6%)。在LA阳性患者中,我们发现56.1%的aPS/PT阳性,而31.7%的aCL和/或a - β 2gpi阳性,同时阳性的病例有限(17.1%)。PS/PT复合体在LA测试解释困难的亚群中招募的约27%的患者中产生了新认识的特异性。与aPT抗体相比,aPS/PT抗体在LA阳性患者中显示出更高的敏感性(55.8%对15.4%)。结论:在aPS的诊断过程中引入aPS/PT抗体是值得推荐的,因为它们具有显著的诊断性能,并且与LA活性高度相关,因此它们是一种可行的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信