International benchmarking and best practice management: in search of health care and hospital excellence.

Q4 Medicine
Wilfried von Eiff
{"title":"International benchmarking and best practice management: in search of health care and hospital excellence.","authors":"Wilfried von Eiff","doi":"10.1108/s1474-823120140000017014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Hospitals worldwide are facing the same opportunities and threats: the demographics of an aging population; steady increases in chronic diseases and severe illnesses; and a steadily increasing demand for medical services with more intensive treatment for multi-morbid patients. Additionally, patients are becoming more demanding. They expect high quality medicine within a dignity-driven and painless healing environment. The severe financial pressures that these developments entail oblige care providers to more and more cost-containment and to apply process reengineering, as well as continuous performance improvement measures, so as to achieve future financial sustainability. At the same time, regulators are calling for improved patient outcomes. Benchmarking and best practice management are successfully proven performance improvement tools for enabling hospitals to achieve a higher level of clinical output quality, enhanced patient satisfaction, and care delivery capability, while simultaneously containing and reducing costs.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>This chapter aims to clarify what benchmarking is and what it is not. Furthermore, it is stated that benchmarking is a powerful managerial tool for improving decision-making processes that can contribute to the above-mentioned improvement measures in health care delivery. The benchmarking approach described in this chapter is oriented toward the philosophy of an input-output model and is explained based on practical international examples from different industries in various countries.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Benchmarking is not a project with a defined start and end point, but a continuous initiative of comparing key performance indicators, process structures, and best practices from best-in-class companies inside and outside industry. Benchmarking is an ongoing process of measuring and searching for best-in-class performance: Measure yourself with yourself over time against key performance indicators. Measure yourself against others. Identify best practices. Equal or exceed this best practice in your institution. Focus on simple and effective ways to implement solutions. Comparing only figures, such as average length of stay, costs of procedures, infection rates, or out-of-stock rates, can lead easily to wrong conclusions and decision making with often-disastrous consequences. Just looking at figures and ratios is not the basis for detecting potential excellence. It is necessary to look beyond the numbers to understand how processes work and contribute to best-in-class results. Best practices from even quite different industries can enable hospitals to leapfrog results in patient orientation, clinical excellence, and cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>Despite common benchmarking approaches, it is pointed out that a comparison without \"looking behind the figures\" (what it means to be familiar with the process structure, process dynamic and drivers, process institutions/rules and process-related incentive components) will be extremely limited referring to reliability and quality of findings. In order to demonstrate transferability of benchmarking results between different industries practical examples from health care, automotive, and hotel service have been selected. Additionally, it is depicted that international comparisons between hospitals providing medical services in different health care systems do have a great potential for achieving leapfrog results in medical quality, organization of service provision, effective work structures, purchasing and logistics processes, or management, etc.</p>","PeriodicalId":35465,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Care Management","volume":"17 ","pages":"223-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/s1474-823120140000017014","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Care Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/s1474-823120140000017014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Purpose: Hospitals worldwide are facing the same opportunities and threats: the demographics of an aging population; steady increases in chronic diseases and severe illnesses; and a steadily increasing demand for medical services with more intensive treatment for multi-morbid patients. Additionally, patients are becoming more demanding. They expect high quality medicine within a dignity-driven and painless healing environment. The severe financial pressures that these developments entail oblige care providers to more and more cost-containment and to apply process reengineering, as well as continuous performance improvement measures, so as to achieve future financial sustainability. At the same time, regulators are calling for improved patient outcomes. Benchmarking and best practice management are successfully proven performance improvement tools for enabling hospitals to achieve a higher level of clinical output quality, enhanced patient satisfaction, and care delivery capability, while simultaneously containing and reducing costs.

Approach: This chapter aims to clarify what benchmarking is and what it is not. Furthermore, it is stated that benchmarking is a powerful managerial tool for improving decision-making processes that can contribute to the above-mentioned improvement measures in health care delivery. The benchmarking approach described in this chapter is oriented toward the philosophy of an input-output model and is explained based on practical international examples from different industries in various countries.

Findings: Benchmarking is not a project with a defined start and end point, but a continuous initiative of comparing key performance indicators, process structures, and best practices from best-in-class companies inside and outside industry. Benchmarking is an ongoing process of measuring and searching for best-in-class performance: Measure yourself with yourself over time against key performance indicators. Measure yourself against others. Identify best practices. Equal or exceed this best practice in your institution. Focus on simple and effective ways to implement solutions. Comparing only figures, such as average length of stay, costs of procedures, infection rates, or out-of-stock rates, can lead easily to wrong conclusions and decision making with often-disastrous consequences. Just looking at figures and ratios is not the basis for detecting potential excellence. It is necessary to look beyond the numbers to understand how processes work and contribute to best-in-class results. Best practices from even quite different industries can enable hospitals to leapfrog results in patient orientation, clinical excellence, and cost-effectiveness.

Originality/value: Despite common benchmarking approaches, it is pointed out that a comparison without "looking behind the figures" (what it means to be familiar with the process structure, process dynamic and drivers, process institutions/rules and process-related incentive components) will be extremely limited referring to reliability and quality of findings. In order to demonstrate transferability of benchmarking results between different industries practical examples from health care, automotive, and hotel service have been selected. Additionally, it is depicted that international comparisons between hospitals providing medical services in different health care systems do have a great potential for achieving leapfrog results in medical quality, organization of service provision, effective work structures, purchasing and logistics processes, or management, etc.

国际基准和最佳实践管理:寻求卓越的医疗保健和医院。
目的:世界各地的医院都面临着同样的机会和威胁:人口老龄化;慢性病和严重疾病稳步增加;对医疗服务的需求稳步增长,对多种疾病患者的治疗更加深入。此外,患者的要求也越来越高。他们期望在尊严驱动和无痛的治疗环境中获得高质量的医疗。这些发展带来的严重财政压力迫使护理提供者越来越多地控制成本,实施流程重组以及持续改进业绩措施,以便实现未来的财务可持续性。与此同时,监管机构呼吁改善患者的治疗效果。标杆管理和最佳实践管理是经过成功验证的绩效改进工具,可使医院实现更高水平的临床输出质量,增强患者满意度和护理交付能力,同时控制和降低成本。方法:本章旨在澄清什么是基准测试,什么不是。此外,报告指出,基准是改进决策过程的有力管理工具,有助于在提供保健服务方面采取上述改进措施。本章中描述的基准方法是面向投入产出模型的哲学,并根据来自不同国家不同行业的实际国际例子进行解释。发现:基准测试不是一个有明确起点和终点的项目,而是一个持续的活动,比较来自行业内外一流公司的关键绩效指标、流程结构和最佳实践。基准测试是一个持续的过程,衡量和寻找最好的表现:随着时间的推移,根据关键的表现指标来衡量自己。拿自己和别人比较。确定最佳实践。等于或超过你所在机构的最佳实践。专注于简单有效的方法来实施解决方案。只比较数字,如平均住院时间、手术费用、感染率或缺货率,很容易导致错误的结论和决策,往往带来灾难性的后果。仅仅看数字和比例并不是发现潜在卓越的基础。有必要超越数字来理解流程是如何工作的,并为一流的结果做出贡献。即使来自完全不同行业的最佳实践也可以使医院在以患者为导向、临床卓越性和成本效益方面实现跨越式发展。原创性/价值:尽管有常见的基准方法,但有人指出,如果不“看数字背后”(即熟悉流程结构、流程动态和驱动因素、流程制度/规则以及与流程相关的激励成分)进行比较,就结果的可靠性和质量而言,将受到极大的限制。为了证明基准测试结果在不同行业之间的可转移性,我们选择了来自医疗保健、汽车和酒店服务的实际例子。此外,本文还描述了在不同医疗保健系统中提供医疗服务的医院之间的国际比较确实具有在医疗质量,服务提供组织,有效的工作结构,采购和物流流程或管理等方面实现跨越式结果的巨大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Health Care Management
Advances in Health Care Management Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信