Strengthening patient-centred communication in rural Ugandan health centres: A theory-driven evaluation within a cluster randomized trial.

IF 2.4 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Susan Nayiga, Deborah DiLiberto, Lilian Taaka, Christine Nabirye, Ane Haaland, Sarah G Staedke, Clare I R Chandler
{"title":"Strengthening patient-centred communication in rural Ugandan health centres: A theory-driven evaluation within a cluster randomized trial.","authors":"Susan Nayiga,&nbsp;Deborah DiLiberto,&nbsp;Lilian Taaka,&nbsp;Christine Nabirye,&nbsp;Ane Haaland,&nbsp;Sarah G Staedke,&nbsp;Clare I R Chandler","doi":"10.1177/1356389014551484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article describes a theory-driven evaluation of one component of an intervention to improve the quality of health care at Ugandan public health centres. Patient-centred services have been advocated widely, but such approaches have received little attention in Africa. A cluster randomized trial is evaluating population-level outcomes of an intervention with multiple components, including 'patient-centred services.' A process evaluation was designed within this trial to articulate and evaluate the implementation and programme theories of the intervention. This article evaluates one hypothesized mechanism of change within the programme theory: the impact of the Patient Centred Services component on health-worker communication. The theory-driven approach extended to evaluation of the outcome measures. The study found that the proximal outcome of patient-centred communication was rated 10 percent higher (<i>p</i> < 0.008) by care seekers consulting with the health workers who were at the intervention health centres compared with those at control health centres. This finding will strengthen interpretation of more distal trial outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47511,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation","volume":"20 4","pages":"471-491"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1356389014551484","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389014551484","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

This article describes a theory-driven evaluation of one component of an intervention to improve the quality of health care at Ugandan public health centres. Patient-centred services have been advocated widely, but such approaches have received little attention in Africa. A cluster randomized trial is evaluating population-level outcomes of an intervention with multiple components, including 'patient-centred services.' A process evaluation was designed within this trial to articulate and evaluate the implementation and programme theories of the intervention. This article evaluates one hypothesized mechanism of change within the programme theory: the impact of the Patient Centred Services component on health-worker communication. The theory-driven approach extended to evaluation of the outcome measures. The study found that the proximal outcome of patient-centred communication was rated 10 percent higher (p < 0.008) by care seekers consulting with the health workers who were at the intervention health centres compared with those at control health centres. This finding will strengthen interpretation of more distal trial outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

加强乌干达农村保健中心以病人为中心的沟通:聚类随机试验中的理论驱动评价。
这篇文章描述了一个理论驱动的评估干预的一个组成部分,以提高卫生保健质量在乌干达公共卫生中心。以病人为中心的服务得到了广泛提倡,但这种方法在非洲很少受到关注。一项集群随机试验正在评估包括“以患者为中心的服务”在内的多种干预措施在人群水平上的结果。在本试验中设计了一个过程评估,以阐明和评估干预的实施和方案理论。本文评估了规划理论中一个假设的变化机制:以患者为中心的服务对卫生工作者沟通的影响。理论驱动的方法扩展到结果测量的评估。研究发现,与对照组保健中心的保健工作者相比,与干预保健中心的保健工作者进行咨询的求助者对以病人为中心的沟通的最近结果的评价高出10% (p < 0.008)。这一发现将加强对远端试验结果的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evaluation
Evaluation SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信