The Brave New World of Personality Disorder-Trait Specified: Effects of Additional Definitions on Coverage, Prevalence, and Comorbidity.

Lee Anna Clark, Emily N Vanderbleek, Jaime L Shapiro, Hallie Nuzum, Xia Allen, Elizabeth Daly, Thomas J Kingsbury, Morgan Oiler, Eunyoe Ro
{"title":"The Brave New World of Personality Disorder-Trait Specified: Effects of Additional Definitions on Coverage, Prevalence, and Comorbidity.","authors":"Lee Anna Clark,&nbsp;Emily N Vanderbleek,&nbsp;Jaime L Shapiro,&nbsp;Hallie Nuzum,&nbsp;Xia Allen,&nbsp;Elizabeth Daly,&nbsp;Thomas J Kingsbury,&nbsp;Morgan Oiler,&nbsp;Eunyoe Ro","doi":"10.5127/pr.036314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The alternative dimensional model for personality disorder (PD) in <i>DSM-5</i>, Section III (<i>DSM-5</i>-III) includes two main criteria: (A) personality-functioning impairment, and (B) personality-trait pathology; provides specific functioning-and-trait criteria for six PD-type diagnoses; and introduces PD-trait specified (PD-TS), which requires meeting the general PD criteria and not meeting criteria for any specific PD type. We termed this Simple PD-TS and developed two additional definitions: Mixed PD-TS, meeting criteria for one or two PD types and having five or more <i>additional</i> pathological traits; and Complex PD-TS, meeting criteria for three or more PD types. In a mixed sample of 165 outpatients and 215 community adults screened to be at high-risk for PD, we investigated the effect of these additional definitions on prevalence, coverage, comorbidity, and within-diagnosis heterogeneity, and conclude that eliminating the PD-type diagnoses and thus having PD-TS as the only PD diagnosis would be both more parsimonious and more useful clinically.</p>","PeriodicalId":90957,"journal":{"name":"Psychopathology review","volume":"2 1","pages":"52-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5127/pr.036314","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopathology review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5127/pr.036314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

The alternative dimensional model for personality disorder (PD) in DSM-5, Section III (DSM-5-III) includes two main criteria: (A) personality-functioning impairment, and (B) personality-trait pathology; provides specific functioning-and-trait criteria for six PD-type diagnoses; and introduces PD-trait specified (PD-TS), which requires meeting the general PD criteria and not meeting criteria for any specific PD type. We termed this Simple PD-TS and developed two additional definitions: Mixed PD-TS, meeting criteria for one or two PD types and having five or more additional pathological traits; and Complex PD-TS, meeting criteria for three or more PD types. In a mixed sample of 165 outpatients and 215 community adults screened to be at high-risk for PD, we investigated the effect of these additional definitions on prevalence, coverage, comorbidity, and within-diagnosis heterogeneity, and conclude that eliminating the PD-type diagnoses and thus having PD-TS as the only PD diagnosis would be both more parsimonious and more useful clinically.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

人格障碍的美丽新世界-特征指定:附加定义对覆盖率、患病率和合并症的影响。
DSM-5第三部分中人格障碍(PD)的替代维度模型包括两个主要标准:(A)人格功能障碍,(B)人格特质病理;为6种pd型诊断提供了具体的功能和特征标准;并引入PD-trait指定(PD- ts),它要求满足一般PD标准,而不满足任何特定PD类型的标准。我们将其命名为简单PD- ts,并发展了两个额外的定义:混合型PD- ts,符合一种或两种PD类型的标准,并具有五种或更多的附加病理特征;和复杂PD- ts,满足三种或更多PD类型的标准。在一个由165名门诊患者和215名社区成人筛查的PD高危人群组成的混合样本中,我们调查了这些附加定义对患病率、覆盖率、合共病和诊断异质性的影响,并得出结论,消除PD类型诊断,从而将PD- ts作为唯一的PD诊断将更简洁,在临床上更有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信