Sluggish cognitive tempo and its neurocognitive, social and emotive correlates: a systematic review of the current literature.

Journal of molecular psychiatry Pub Date : 2014-08-05 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1186/2049-9256-2-5
Anna Katharina Mueller, Lara Tucha, Janneke Koerts, Yvonne Groen, Klaus W Lange, Oliver Tucha
{"title":"Sluggish cognitive tempo and its neurocognitive, social and emotive correlates: a systematic review of the current literature.","authors":"Anna Katharina Mueller,&nbsp;Lara Tucha,&nbsp;Janneke Koerts,&nbsp;Yvonne Groen,&nbsp;Klaus W Lange,&nbsp;Oliver Tucha","doi":"10.1186/2049-9256-2-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Since the elimination of items associated with Sluggish Cognitive Tempo (SCT) during the transition from DSM-III to DSM-IV from the diagnostic criteria of Attention-deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), interest in SCT and its associated cognitive as well as emotional and social consequences is on the increase. The current review discusses recent findings on SCT in clinical as well as community based ADHD populations. The focus is further on clinical correlates of SCT in populations different from ADHD, SCT's genetic background, SCT's association with internalizing and other behavioral comorbidities, as well as SCT's association with social functioning and its treatment efficacy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic review of empirical studies on SCT in ADHD and other pathologies in PsycInfo, SocIndex, Web of Science and PubMed using the key terms \"Sluggish Cognitive Tempo\", \"Cognitive Tempo\", \"Sluggish Tempo\" was performed. Thirty-two out of 63 studies met inclusion criteria and are discussed in the current review.</p><p><strong>Results/conclusion: </strong>From the current literature, it can be concluded that SCT is a psychometrically valid construct with additive value in the clinical field of ADHD, oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), internalizing disorders and neuro-rehabilitation. The taxonomy of SCT has been shown to be far from consistent across studies; however, the impact of SCT on individuals' functioning (e.g., academic achievement, social interactions) seems remarkable. SCT has been shown to share some of the genes with ADHD, however, related most strongly to non-shared environmental factors. Future research should focus on the identification of adequate SCT measurement to promote symptom tailored treatment and increase studies on SCT in populations different from ADHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":73838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of molecular psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/2049-9256-2-5","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of molecular psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-9256-2-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Objectives: Since the elimination of items associated with Sluggish Cognitive Tempo (SCT) during the transition from DSM-III to DSM-IV from the diagnostic criteria of Attention-deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), interest in SCT and its associated cognitive as well as emotional and social consequences is on the increase. The current review discusses recent findings on SCT in clinical as well as community based ADHD populations. The focus is further on clinical correlates of SCT in populations different from ADHD, SCT's genetic background, SCT's association with internalizing and other behavioral comorbidities, as well as SCT's association with social functioning and its treatment efficacy.

Method: A systematic review of empirical studies on SCT in ADHD and other pathologies in PsycInfo, SocIndex, Web of Science and PubMed using the key terms "Sluggish Cognitive Tempo", "Cognitive Tempo", "Sluggish Tempo" was performed. Thirty-two out of 63 studies met inclusion criteria and are discussed in the current review.

Results/conclusion: From the current literature, it can be concluded that SCT is a psychometrically valid construct with additive value in the clinical field of ADHD, oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), internalizing disorders and neuro-rehabilitation. The taxonomy of SCT has been shown to be far from consistent across studies; however, the impact of SCT on individuals' functioning (e.g., academic achievement, social interactions) seems remarkable. SCT has been shown to share some of the genes with ADHD, however, related most strongly to non-shared environmental factors. Future research should focus on the identification of adequate SCT measurement to promote symptom tailored treatment and increase studies on SCT in populations different from ADHD.

迟钝的认知节奏及其神经认知、社会和情感的相关性:对当前文献的系统综述。
目的:由于从注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的诊断标准中删除了从DSM-III到DSM-IV过渡期间与Sluggish Cognitive Tempo(SCT)相关的项目,因此对SCT及其相关的认知、情感和社会后果的兴趣正在增加。目前的综述讨论了SCT在临床和社区ADHD人群中的最新发现。重点是不同于多动症人群的SCT的临床相关性、SCT的遗传背景、SCT与内化和其他行为合并症的关系,以及SCT与社会功能及其治疗效果的关系。方法:系统回顾了PsycInfo、SocIndex、Web of Science和PubMed上关于SCT在多动症和其他病理中的实证研究,使用了关键术语“Sluggish Cognitive Tempo”、“Cognitive Tempo”和“Sluggesh Tempo”。63项研究中有32项符合纳入标准,并在本综述中进行了讨论。结果/结论:从目前的文献中可以得出结论,SCT是一种心理测量学上有效的结构,在多动症、对立违抗性障碍(ODD)、内化障碍和神经康复的临床领域具有附加价值。SCT的分类已被证明在各研究中远不一致;然而,SCT对个体功能(如学业成绩、社会交往)的影响似乎是显著的。SCT已被证明与多动症共享一些基因,然而,与非共享环境因素的关系最为密切。未来的研究应侧重于确定适当的SCT测量,以促进症状定制治疗,并增加对不同于多动症人群的SCT的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信