Comparison between early enteral feeding with a transnasal tube and parenteral nutrition after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Hepato-gastroenterology Pub Date : 2015-03-01
Eiji Nomura, Sang-Woong Lee, Masaru Kawai, Hitoshi Hara, Kazuhito Nabeshima, Kenji Nakamura, Kazuhisa Uchiyama
{"title":"Comparison between early enteral feeding with a transnasal tube and parenteral nutrition after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.","authors":"Eiji Nomura,&nbsp;Sang-Woong Lee,&nbsp;Masaru Kawai,&nbsp;Hitoshi Hara,&nbsp;Kazuhito Nabeshima,&nbsp;Kenji Nakamura,&nbsp;Kazuhisa Uchiyama","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>This retrospective study evaluated 21 patients with early enteral feeding (EEF group) and 22 patients without early enteral feeding (non-EEF group) who underwent open total gastrectomy followed by Roux en Y reconstruction and were RO resectable cases. METHDOLOGY: Postoperative complications and course, postoperative/preoperative body weight, whole meal intake, and nutritional, inflammatory, and immunological parameters were recorded and evaluated in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative meal intake was significantly higher and the first day of defecation was significantly earlier in the EEF group than in the non-EEF group. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the blood laboratory data and the rate of complications. In patients with complications, lymphocyte counts and postoperative body weights were compared as indicators of immunostimulation. The lymphocyte counts 7 days after operation and postoperative/preoperative body weight were significantly higher in the EEF group than in the non-EEF group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although immunostimulation-like findings were observed in the patients with complications after surgery in the present study, the significance of EEF was not clarified because of the lack of cases whose conditions were severe. EEF should be used especially for patients in whom severe disease is possible and avoidance of TPN is desirable.</p>","PeriodicalId":12985,"journal":{"name":"Hepato-gastroenterology","volume":"62 138","pages":"536-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepato-gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: This retrospective study evaluated 21 patients with early enteral feeding (EEF group) and 22 patients without early enteral feeding (non-EEF group) who underwent open total gastrectomy followed by Roux en Y reconstruction and were RO resectable cases. METHDOLOGY: Postoperative complications and course, postoperative/preoperative body weight, whole meal intake, and nutritional, inflammatory, and immunological parameters were recorded and evaluated in both groups.

Results: Postoperative meal intake was significantly higher and the first day of defecation was significantly earlier in the EEF group than in the non-EEF group. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the blood laboratory data and the rate of complications. In patients with complications, lymphocyte counts and postoperative body weights were compared as indicators of immunostimulation. The lymphocyte counts 7 days after operation and postoperative/preoperative body weight were significantly higher in the EEF group than in the non-EEF group.

Conclusions: Although immunostimulation-like findings were observed in the patients with complications after surgery in the present study, the significance of EEF was not clarified because of the lack of cases whose conditions were severe. EEF should be used especially for patients in whom severe disease is possible and avoidance of TPN is desirable.

胃癌全胃切除术后早期经鼻插管肠内喂养与肠外营养的比较。
背景/目的:本回顾性研究评估了21例早期肠内喂养(EEF组)和22例未早期肠内喂养(非EEF组)行开放式全胃切除术后Roux en Y重建的RO可切除病例。方法:记录并评估两组患者的术后并发症和病程、术后/术前体重、全餐摄入量、营养、炎症和免疫参数。结果:EEF组术后进食量明显高于非EEF组,排便时间明显早于非EEF组。两组患者血液实验室数据及并发症发生率无显著差异。对于有并发症的患者,比较淋巴细胞计数和术后体重作为免疫刺激的指标。EEF组术后7 d淋巴细胞计数及术后/术前体重均显著高于非EEF组。结论:虽然本研究在术后并发症患者中观察到类似免疫刺激的结果,但由于缺乏病情严重的病例,EEF的意义尚不明确。EEF应特别用于可能出现严重疾病的患者,避免TPN是可取的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hepato-gastroenterology
Hepato-gastroenterology 医学-外科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: Hepato-Gastroenterology has been discontinued as of 2015. Extremely limited quantities of back issues in print available for sale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信