Efficacy of non-stented pancreaticojejunostomy demonstrated in the hard pancreas.

Hepato-gastroenterology Pub Date : 2015-03-01
Shuji Suzuki, Yuhi Ozaki, Shin Saida, Satoshi Kaji, Nobusada Koike, Nobuhiko Harada, Tsuneo Hayashi, Mamoru Suzuki, Takafumi Tabuchi
{"title":"Efficacy of non-stented pancreaticojejunostomy demonstrated in the hard pancreas.","authors":"Shuji Suzuki,&nbsp;Yuhi Ozaki,&nbsp;Shin Saida,&nbsp;Satoshi Kaji,&nbsp;Nobusada Koike,&nbsp;Nobuhiko Harada,&nbsp;Tsuneo Hayashi,&nbsp;Mamoru Suzuki,&nbsp;Takafumi Tabuchi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare hard and soft pancreas for short-term complications of pancreaticoduodenectomy performed with a duct-to-mucosa anastomosis of pancreaticojejunostomy without a stenting tube.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We investigated 156 patients with pancreaticojejunostomy who were classified into two groups of hard pancreas (group A: 79) and soft pancreas (group B: 77). Outcomes, including complications and operative procedures, are reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no differences between groups A and B for median age, gender, performance status. Biliary drainage ratio and disease classification of Groups A and B were statistically different. In preoperative status, there were no differences in Body Mass Index, total bilirubin, albumin, hemoglobin, creatinine, and PFD. Group B had lower HbA1C levels than group A. In operative procedures, there were no differences in operative times and blood loss, but group B had longer postoperative hospital days than group A. On operative results, there were no differences in mortality, delayed gastric emptying, biliary fistula, hemorrhage, cholangitis, lymph leakage, and others. There were significant differences between groups A and B in morbidity (12.7% vs. 35.1%), pancreatic fistula (0% vs. 9.1%), intra-abdominal abscess (1.3% vs. 9.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Efficacy of pancreaticojejunostomy without a stenting tube for hard pancreas was demonstrated.</p>","PeriodicalId":12985,"journal":{"name":"Hepato-gastroenterology","volume":"62 138","pages":"279-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepato-gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: The aim of this study was to compare hard and soft pancreas for short-term complications of pancreaticoduodenectomy performed with a duct-to-mucosa anastomosis of pancreaticojejunostomy without a stenting tube.

Methodology: We investigated 156 patients with pancreaticojejunostomy who were classified into two groups of hard pancreas (group A: 79) and soft pancreas (group B: 77). Outcomes, including complications and operative procedures, are reported.

Results: There were no differences between groups A and B for median age, gender, performance status. Biliary drainage ratio and disease classification of Groups A and B were statistically different. In preoperative status, there were no differences in Body Mass Index, total bilirubin, albumin, hemoglobin, creatinine, and PFD. Group B had lower HbA1C levels than group A. In operative procedures, there were no differences in operative times and blood loss, but group B had longer postoperative hospital days than group A. On operative results, there were no differences in mortality, delayed gastric emptying, biliary fistula, hemorrhage, cholangitis, lymph leakage, and others. There were significant differences between groups A and B in morbidity (12.7% vs. 35.1%), pancreatic fistula (0% vs. 9.1%), intra-abdominal abscess (1.3% vs. 9.1%).

Conclusion: Efficacy of pancreaticojejunostomy without a stenting tube for hard pancreas was demonstrated.

硬胰腺非支架胰空肠吻合术的疗效。
背景/目的:本研究的目的是比较硬胰腺和软胰腺在胰十二指肠切除术中采用导管-粘膜吻合术或胰空肠吻合术而不使用支架管的短期并发症。方法:将156例胰空肠吻合术患者分为硬胰组(A组79例)和软胰组(B组77例)。报告结果,包括并发症和手术程序。结果:A、B两组患者中位年龄、性别、体能状况无显著差异。A组与B组胆道引流率及疾病分型差异有统计学意义。在术前状态下,体重指数、总胆红素、白蛋白、血红蛋白、肌酐和PFD没有差异。B组的HbA1C水平低于a组。在手术过程中,手术时间和出血量没有差异,但B组术后住院天数比a组长。在手术结果中,死亡率、胃排空延迟、胆道瘘、出血、胆管炎、淋巴漏等方面没有差异。A组与B组在发病率(12.7% vs. 35.1%)、胰瘘(0% vs. 9.1%)、腹内脓肿(1.3% vs. 9.1%)方面差异有统计学意义。结论:无支架管胰空肠吻合术治疗坚硬胰腺的疗效明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hepato-gastroenterology
Hepato-gastroenterology 医学-外科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: Hepato-Gastroenterology has been discontinued as of 2015. Extremely limited quantities of back issues in print available for sale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信