Evaluation of Semi-supervised Learning for Classification of Protein Crystallization Imagery.

Madhav Sigdel, İmren Dinç, Semih Dinç, Madhu S Sigdel, Marc L Pusey, Ramazan S Aygün
{"title":"Evaluation of Semi-supervised Learning for Classification of Protein Crystallization Imagery.","authors":"Madhav Sigdel,&nbsp;İmren Dinç,&nbsp;Semih Dinç,&nbsp;Madhu S Sigdel,&nbsp;Marc L Pusey,&nbsp;Ramazan S Aygün","doi":"10.1109/SECON.2014.6950649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this paper, we investigate the performance of two wrapper methods for semi-supervised learning algorithms for classification of protein crystallization images with limited labeled images. Firstly, we evaluate the performance of semi-supervised approach using self-training with naïve Bayesian (NB) and sequential minimum optimization (SMO) as the base classifiers. The confidence values returned by these classifiers are used to select high confident predictions to be used for self-training. Secondly, we analyze the performance of Yet Another Two Stage Idea (YATSI) semi-supervised learning using NB, SMO, multilayer perceptron (MLP), J48 and random forest (RF) classifiers. These results are compared with the basic supervised learning using the same training sets. We perform our experiments on a dataset consisting of 2250 protein crystallization images for different proportions of training and test data. Our results indicate that NB and SMO using both self-training and YATSI semi-supervised approaches improve accuracies with respect to supervised learning. On the other hand, MLP, J48 and RF perform better using basic supervised learning. Overall, random forest classifier yields the best accuracy with supervised learning for our dataset.</p>","PeriodicalId":90950,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of IEEE Southeastcon. IEEE Southeastcon","volume":"2014 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/SECON.2014.6950649","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of IEEE Southeastcon. IEEE Southeastcon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SECON.2014.6950649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the performance of two wrapper methods for semi-supervised learning algorithms for classification of protein crystallization images with limited labeled images. Firstly, we evaluate the performance of semi-supervised approach using self-training with naïve Bayesian (NB) and sequential minimum optimization (SMO) as the base classifiers. The confidence values returned by these classifiers are used to select high confident predictions to be used for self-training. Secondly, we analyze the performance of Yet Another Two Stage Idea (YATSI) semi-supervised learning using NB, SMO, multilayer perceptron (MLP), J48 and random forest (RF) classifiers. These results are compared with the basic supervised learning using the same training sets. We perform our experiments on a dataset consisting of 2250 protein crystallization images for different proportions of training and test data. Our results indicate that NB and SMO using both self-training and YATSI semi-supervised approaches improve accuracies with respect to supervised learning. On the other hand, MLP, J48 and RF perform better using basic supervised learning. Overall, random forest classifier yields the best accuracy with supervised learning for our dataset.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

半监督学习对蛋白质结晶图像分类的评价。
在本文中,我们研究了两种包装方法的半监督学习算法的性能,用于有限标记图像的蛋白质结晶图像分类。首先,我们使用naïve贝叶斯(NB)和顺序最小优化(SMO)作为基本分类器,对半监督方法的性能进行了评估。这些分类器返回的置信度值用于选择用于自我训练的高置信度预测。其次,我们使用NB, SMO,多层感知器(MLP), J48和随机森林(RF)分类器分析了Yet Another Two Stage Idea (YATSI)半监督学习的性能。这些结果与使用相同训练集的基本监督学习进行了比较。我们在一个由2250个蛋白质结晶图像组成的数据集上进行实验,以获得不同比例的训练和测试数据。我们的研究结果表明,NB和SMO使用自训练和YATSI半监督方法提高了监督学习的准确性。另一方面,MLP、J48和RF在使用基本监督学习时表现更好。总的来说,随机森林分类器通过监督学习为我们的数据集提供了最好的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信