K Rodriguez, E Kaselitz, J Wong, S Ligard, D Peck, V Hugo Mena, F Gordillo, D Serlin, M Heisler
{"title":"Improving preclinic preparation for patients with chronic conditions in quito, ecuador: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"K Rodriguez, E Kaselitz, J Wong, S Ligard, D Peck, V Hugo Mena, F Gordillo, D Serlin, M Heisler","doi":"10.1155/2015/724245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives. As in many settings, patients in community health centers in Ecuador do not complete previsit forms or receive assistance to identify questions and concerns they would like to address in brief clinic visits with physicians. We examined the comparative effectiveness of providing (1) a previsit form to complete; (2) a previsit form along with assistance in completing the form; and (3) usual care. Methods. Parallel, three-arm randomized controlled trial in two health centers serving indigent to low-income communities in Quito, Ecuador, among 199 adult patients who took medications for at least one chronic condition. Outcome measures were self-reported satisfaction with the visit, confidence in asking questions, and extent to which patients' objectives were met. Results. Patients who received assistance in completing a previsit form were more than twice as likely as participants in usual care to report achieving everything they wanted during their visit (AOR 2.2, P = 0.039). There were no differences in any outcomes between the groups who received the previsit form with no assistance and usual care. Conclusions. For high-quality patient-centered primary care, it is important to develop and test innovative and scalable interventions for patients and physicians to make the best use of limited clinic time. </p>","PeriodicalId":89569,"journal":{"name":"International journal of family medicine","volume":"2015 ","pages":"724245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2015/724245","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of family medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/724245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objectives. As in many settings, patients in community health centers in Ecuador do not complete previsit forms or receive assistance to identify questions and concerns they would like to address in brief clinic visits with physicians. We examined the comparative effectiveness of providing (1) a previsit form to complete; (2) a previsit form along with assistance in completing the form; and (3) usual care. Methods. Parallel, three-arm randomized controlled trial in two health centers serving indigent to low-income communities in Quito, Ecuador, among 199 adult patients who took medications for at least one chronic condition. Outcome measures were self-reported satisfaction with the visit, confidence in asking questions, and extent to which patients' objectives were met. Results. Patients who received assistance in completing a previsit form were more than twice as likely as participants in usual care to report achieving everything they wanted during their visit (AOR 2.2, P = 0.039). There were no differences in any outcomes between the groups who received the previsit form with no assistance and usual care. Conclusions. For high-quality patient-centered primary care, it is important to develop and test innovative and scalable interventions for patients and physicians to make the best use of limited clinic time.
目标。与许多情况一样,厄瓜多尔社区保健中心的病人没有填写预诊表,也没有得到帮助,以确定他们希望在与医生的简短门诊就诊中解决的问题和关切。我们检验了提供(1)预诊表格的相对有效性;(二)预约表格及协助填写表格;(3)日常护理。方法。在厄瓜多尔基多两家为低收入社区的贫困人口服务的医疗中心进行的平行三组随机对照试验中,199名患有至少一种慢性疾病的成年患者服用了药物。结果测量是自我报告的访问满意度,提问的信心,以及患者目标达到的程度。结果。接受协助完成预诊表的患者比接受常规护理的患者报告在就诊期间达到他们想要的一切的可能性高出两倍以上(AOR 2.2, P = 0.039)。在没有任何帮助和常规护理的情况下,接受预诊表格的两组之间的任何结果都没有差异。结论。对于以患者为中心的高质量初级保健,重要的是为患者和医生开发和测试创新和可扩展的干预措施,以充分利用有限的临床时间。