Variable color Doppler sonographic appearances of retained products of conception: radiologic-pathologic correlation.

Aya Kamaya, Priya M Krishnarao, Ann K Folkins, R Brooke Jeffrey, Terry S Desser, Katherine E Maturen
{"title":"Variable color Doppler sonographic appearances of retained products of conception: radiologic-pathologic correlation.","authors":"Aya Kamaya,&nbsp;Priya M Krishnarao,&nbsp;Ann K Folkins,&nbsp;R Brooke Jeffrey,&nbsp;Terry S Desser,&nbsp;Katherine E Maturen","doi":"10.1007/s00261-015-0424-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Object of study: </strong>Retained products of conception (RPOC) displays variable vascularity, ranging from avascular to markedly vascular on color Doppler sonography. We hypothesize that variability in sonographic vascularity may be due to histopathologic variation in the placental tissue.</p><p><strong>Materials, methods, and procedures: </strong>After institutional review board approval, sonographic images and pathologic specimens were retrospectively reviewed in 26 patients with pathologically proven RPOC. Ultrasound (US) images were scored 0-3 for the degree of vascularity by two radiologists blinded to the diagnosis. Corresponding pathologic specimens were evaluated for vascularization of chorionic villi, degree of inflammation, morphology of maternal arteries, chorionic villous preservation, and percentage of clot, membranes, chorionic villi, and decidua/myometrium. Statistical analysis, including multiple linear regression, was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RPOC with histologically avascular chorionic villi or those with markedly reduced vascularization had significantly lower US vascularity scores (p = 0.030) than those with chorionic villi showing normal or decreased vascularization. Sonographically avascular RPOC had a significantly lower percentage villi (p = 0.028) and higher percentage of decidua (p = 0.004) than specimens where US showed any Doppler vascularity. Histologic vascularity of villi (p = 0.049) and non-observation of maternal arteries (p = 0.001) were significant predictors of US vascularity scores in multivariate linear regression analysis, while inflammation of villi (p = 0.053) was a marginally significant predictor.</p><p><strong>Significance of the conclusions: </strong>Histologic vascularity of villi appears to contribute to the observed variation in sonographic vascularity. This finding may underlie known differences in clinical outcomes between sonographic vascularity groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":7014,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Imaging","volume":"40 7","pages":"2683-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00261-015-0424-x","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0424-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Object of study: Retained products of conception (RPOC) displays variable vascularity, ranging from avascular to markedly vascular on color Doppler sonography. We hypothesize that variability in sonographic vascularity may be due to histopathologic variation in the placental tissue.

Materials, methods, and procedures: After institutional review board approval, sonographic images and pathologic specimens were retrospectively reviewed in 26 patients with pathologically proven RPOC. Ultrasound (US) images were scored 0-3 for the degree of vascularity by two radiologists blinded to the diagnosis. Corresponding pathologic specimens were evaluated for vascularization of chorionic villi, degree of inflammation, morphology of maternal arteries, chorionic villous preservation, and percentage of clot, membranes, chorionic villi, and decidua/myometrium. Statistical analysis, including multiple linear regression, was performed.

Results: RPOC with histologically avascular chorionic villi or those with markedly reduced vascularization had significantly lower US vascularity scores (p = 0.030) than those with chorionic villi showing normal or decreased vascularization. Sonographically avascular RPOC had a significantly lower percentage villi (p = 0.028) and higher percentage of decidua (p = 0.004) than specimens where US showed any Doppler vascularity. Histologic vascularity of villi (p = 0.049) and non-observation of maternal arteries (p = 0.001) were significant predictors of US vascularity scores in multivariate linear regression analysis, while inflammation of villi (p = 0.053) was a marginally significant predictor.

Significance of the conclusions: Histologic vascularity of villi appears to contribute to the observed variation in sonographic vascularity. This finding may underlie known differences in clinical outcomes between sonographic vascularity groups.

妊娠保留产物的可变彩色多普勒超声表现:影像学-病理相关性。
研究对象:彩色多普勒超声显示妊娠产物(RPOC)血管变化,从无血管到明显血管不等。我们假设超声血管的变异性可能是由于胎盘组织的组织病理学变异。材料、方法和程序:经机构审查委员会批准,回顾性分析26例经病理证实的RPOC患者的超声图像和病理标本。超声(US)图像评分0-3的程度的血管由两名放射科医生盲诊断。对相应的病理标本进行绒毛膜绒毛血管化、炎症程度、母体动脉形态、绒毛膜绒毛保存、血块、膜、绒毛膜绒毛和蜕膜/肌层百分比的评估。采用多元线性回归进行统计分析。结果:组织学上无血管性绒毛膜绒毛或血管化明显减少的RPOC的US血管化评分明显低于血管化正常或减少的绒毛膜绒毛患者(p = 0.030)。超声无血管RPOC的绒毛百分比明显低于超声多普勒血管显示的标本(p = 0.028),蜕膜百分比明显高于超声多普勒血管显示的标本(p = 0.004)。在多元线性回归分析中,绒毛组织学血管通畅(p = 0.049)和未观察到母体动脉(p = 0.001)是US血管通畅评分的显著预测因子,而绒毛炎症(p = 0.053)是一个边际显著的预测因子。结论的意义:绒毛的组织学血管性似乎有助于超声检查血管性的变化。这一发现可能是超声血管组之间临床结果已知差异的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Abdominal Imaging
Abdominal Imaging 医学-核医学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信