{"title":"ENTHUSIASM DELINEATED: WEEPING AS A RELIGIOUS ACTIVITY IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY BRITAIN.","authors":"Thomas Dixon","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Eighteenth-century Europe and its renowned cult of sensibility have a special place in the history of tears. This article revisits weeping in eighteenth-century Britain, seeking especially to recover the religious practices, texts, and ideas involved in the production and interpretation of tears. Some of the most prolific and public weeping of the period was produced by the Methodist revival, and especially the preaching of the \"Weeping Prophet\", George Whitefield. A different, more melancholy form of enthusiasm was the keynote of Henry Mackenzie's famously lachrymose novel The Man of Feeling (1771), reinterpreted here as a handbook of Christian sensibility and religious weeping. On both sides of the French Revolution debate in Britain in the 1790s, tears were shed, but were also denounced. The retrospective belief that tearful sensibilities had given rise to dangerous ideologies and bloody violence cast the practice of weeping in a new light. Suspicions of religious \"enthusiasm\" from earlier periods were now applied to revolutionary sympathisers in Britain, and commentators, including Helen Maria Williams, began to discuss the idea that it was un-English to weep.</p>","PeriodicalId":36301,"journal":{"name":"Litteraria Pragensia","volume":"22 43","pages":"59-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4374106/pdf/emss-61932.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Litteraria Pragensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Eighteenth-century Europe and its renowned cult of sensibility have a special place in the history of tears. This article revisits weeping in eighteenth-century Britain, seeking especially to recover the religious practices, texts, and ideas involved in the production and interpretation of tears. Some of the most prolific and public weeping of the period was produced by the Methodist revival, and especially the preaching of the "Weeping Prophet", George Whitefield. A different, more melancholy form of enthusiasm was the keynote of Henry Mackenzie's famously lachrymose novel The Man of Feeling (1771), reinterpreted here as a handbook of Christian sensibility and religious weeping. On both sides of the French Revolution debate in Britain in the 1790s, tears were shed, but were also denounced. The retrospective belief that tearful sensibilities had given rise to dangerous ideologies and bloody violence cast the practice of weeping in a new light. Suspicions of religious "enthusiasm" from earlier periods were now applied to revolutionary sympathisers in Britain, and commentators, including Helen Maria Williams, began to discuss the idea that it was un-English to weep.
18世纪的欧洲及其著名的感性崇拜在眼泪的历史上占有特殊的地位。这篇文章回顾了18世纪英国的哭泣,尤其试图恢复与眼泪的产生和解释有关的宗教习俗、文本和思想。这一时期最多产和最公开的哭泣是由卫理公会复兴产生的,尤其是“哭泣的先知”乔治·怀特菲尔德的布道。亨利·麦肯齐(Henry Mackenzie)著名的悲情小说《有感情的人》(1771)的主题是一种不同的、更忧郁的热情,这本书被重新诠释为一本基督教情感和宗教哭泣的手册。在18世纪90年代的英国,争论法国大革命的双方都流下了眼泪,但也都受到了谴责。回顾过去,人们认为感性的眼泪导致了危险的意识形态和血腥的暴力,这使人们对哭泣的做法有了新的认识。早期对宗教“热情”的怀疑现在被应用到英国的革命同情者身上,包括海伦·玛丽亚·威廉姆斯(Helen Maria Williams)在内的评论员开始讨论哭泣不符合英国人的观点。